Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Creating Space for Feminist Ethics in Medical School

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alongside clinical practice, medical schools now confront mounting reasons to examine nontraditional approaches to ethics. Increasing awareness of systems of oppression and their effects on the experiences of trainees, patients, professionals, and generally on medical care, is pushing medical curriculum into an unfamiliar territory. While there is room throughout medical school to take up these concerns, ethics curricula are well-positioned to explore new pedagogical approaches. Feminist ethics has long addressed systems of oppression and broader structures of power. Some of its established concepts can offer distinct value as medical climates change and adapt in response to increased awareness of the experiences of marginalized individuals and populations. In this essay, we offer a set of concepts from feminist ethics that have a fundamental role to play in medical school curriculum: relationality, relational autonomy, and epistemic justice. Though these concepts are not exhaustive, they can be taught in tandem with the concepts that have historically grounded ethics education in medical school, such as autonomy and beneficence. Ultimately, we contend that these concepts hold particular value in ethics curriculum insofar as they diversify mainstream ethical approaches, directly address the pervasiveness of systems of oppression in medicine, and recognize the voices and concerns that may be marginalized in standard approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aviv, R. (2018). What does it mean to die? The New Yorker.

  • Baier, A. (1981). Cartesian persons. Philosophia,10, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley, A. (2013). Gender matters in medical education. Medical Education,47(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, J. L., Lai, C. J., Lockspeiser, T., O’Sullivan, P. S., Aronowitz, P., Dellmore, D., et al. (2019). Pursuit of honors. Academic Medicine,94, S48–S56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, E. W., & Kodish, E. (1999). Baby Aaron and the elders. Hastings Center Report,29(5), 20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, D., & Burt, R. (1998). Confronting death: Who chooses, who controls? The Hastings Center Report,28(1), 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L., & Stewart, H. (2018). Microaggressions in clinical medicine. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal,28(4), 411–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2003). Epistemic justice and a role for virtue in the politics of knowing. Metaphilosophy, 34(1–2): 154–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power & the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. (2018). Revisiting death: Implicit bias and the case of Jahi McMath. Hastings Center Report,48(12), S77–S80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greysen, S. R., Allen, R., Rosenthal, M. S., Lucas, G. I., & Wang, E. A. (2013). Improving the quality of discharge care for the homeless: A patient-centered approach. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved,24(2), 444–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, B. (2014). Patient: Poems. New York: Black Lawrence Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, C. (2016). Supported health care decision-making for people with intellectual and cognitive disabilities. Family Practice,33(5), 445–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, H. (2019). An invitation to feminist ethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Low, D., Pollack, S. W., Liao, Z. C., Maestas, R., Kirven, L. E., Eacker, A. M., et al. (2019). Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teaching and Learning in Medicine,31(5), 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2019). #MeToo in surgery: Narratives by women surgeons. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics,9(3), 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff, H., & Lyerly, A. D. (2010). Samantha Burton and the rights of pregnant women twenty years after in re A.C. Hastings Center Report,40(6), 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedelsky, J. (2011). Law's relations: A relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paturel, A. (2019). Closing the gender pay gap in medicine. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from AAMC: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/closing-gender-pay-gap-medicine.

  • Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2015). Is racism a fundamental cause of inequalities in health? Annual Review of Sociology,41(1), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabin, J. A. (2020). How we fail black patients in pain. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from AAMC. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/how-we-fail-black-patients-pain

  • Sharma, M. (2019). Applying feminist theory to medical education. Lancet,393, 570–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, S. (1992). No longer patient: Feminist ethics and health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, D., et al. (2017). Patient decision aids to engage adults in treatment or screening decisions. JAMA,318(7), 657–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedantam, S., et al. (2017). Remembering Anarcha, Lucy, and Betsey: The mothers of modern gynecology, National Public Radio. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from https://www.npr.org/2017/02/07/513764158/remembering-anarcha-lucy-and-betsey-the-mothers-of-modern-gynecology.

  • Warsaw, A. (2018). Learning without walls, AAMC. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/insights/learning-without-walls.

  • Weeks, W. B., et al. (2009). How do race and sex affect the earnings of primary care physicians? Health Affairs,28(2), 557–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S. (2006). The social construction of disability. In E. Hackett & S. Haslanger (Eds.), Theorizing feminisms: A reader (pp. 23–29). Press: New York, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, A., et al. (2019). The relational potential standard: Rethinking the ethical justification for life-sustaining treatment for children with profound cognitive disabilities. Hastings Center Report,49(3), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019). Reducing racial inequities in health: Using what we already know to take action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,16(606), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, F. M., Stratton, T. D., & Nora, L. M. (2006). Stories from the field: Students’ descriptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment during medical school. Academic Medicine,81(7), 648–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgina D. Campelia.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campelia, G.D., Feinsinger, A. Creating Space for Feminist Ethics in Medical School. HEC Forum 32, 111–124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09403-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09403-x

Navigation