Skip to main content

Scientific Realism in the Post-Kuhnian Times

–Beyond Structuralism and Historicism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Map and the Territory

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

  • 1822 Accesses

Abstract

Motivated by the developments in contemporary mathematical physics and the related interpretive and historiographical works on these developments, a structuralist and historically constitutive and constructive approach to scientific realism (SHASR) is proposed to address the challenges Thomas Kuhn raised against scientific realism, and to remove the defects of the currently available dissatisfactory responses the structuralists put forward to the challenges. The paper shows that SHASR productively exploits the insights from both Kuhn’s historicism and his critics’ structuralism, while avoids the traps in both traditions. Then, after a brief comparison between SHASR and the increasingly popular neo-Kantian post-Kuhnian philosophy of science recommended and defended by Michael Freedman and some others, it concludes with a big picture about the science-world relationship derived from the notion of emergence conceptualized within the framework of SHASR, whose bearings on the Kantian question of the phenomenal - noumenal relationship are worth further explorations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    How a CF is historically constituted will be addressed below, although Kuhn himself did not have proper conceptual resources to address it.

  2. 2.

    This implication is explored in details in Cao (2010).

  3. 3.

    For a detailed discussion of the important roles of FE in theoretical physics, see Sect. 9.1 of (Cao 2010).

  4. 4.

    It goes without saying that the whole discussion above remains within the discourse of structuralism because the notion of the electron as a kind of entity is completely formulated in structural terms: the notions of mass and charge are (and can only be) defined in relational and structural terms: no entity would have any mass if it exists lonely in the world in which no other masses exist and thus no gravitational relations with other masses exist; the same can be said to the notion of charge.

  5. 5.

    Detailed descriptions and analyses of these developments can be found in Cao (1997, 1999, 2001, 2006, 2010, 2014a, 2016).

  6. 6.

    Cf. Simons (1994).

  7. 7.

    In the sense of context-insensitive, not of existing lonely without connecting to others.

  8. 8.

    For the case of QCD, see Cao (2010, 2014a); for a more general discussion of the claim, see Cao (2014b).

  9. 9.

    In the new configuration associated with the new entity (with new and different essence, thus a different entity from the old one) constituted thereby, the retained structural features from the old configuration retain their constitutive roles in the new context, as the extended notion of GE mentioned above suggests, although their places (at the core or periphery) and functions (identifying-features-placing or not) have changed.

  10. 10.

    In an important sense, the classical electron in Thompson’s theory and the quantum electron in Dirac’s theory are different entities. In an even deeper sense, however, they, as manifestation of two different aspects at two different levels of the same electron in the causal-hierarchical structure of the noumenal world, refer to the same entity, or more precisely, refer to different aspects at different levels of the same noumenal electron. Thus realism defined in SHASR is not the naïve realism about unobservable entities or properties or mechanism, etc., but the realism of various manifestations of the causal-hierarchical structure of the noumenal world.

References

  • G. Amelino-Camelia, Doubly-special relativity: facts, Myths and some key open issues. Symmetry 2, 230–271 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Spontaneous breakdown of symmetry: its rediscovery and integration into quantum field theory, in Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, ed. by L.M. Brown, vol. 21(2), pp. 211–235, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Prerequisites for a Consistent Framework of Quantum Gravity, in the Studies. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 32(2), 181–204 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Can we dissolve physical entities into mathematical structures? Synthese 136(1), 57–71 (2003a)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, What is ontological synthesis? A reply to simon saunders. Synthese 136(1), 107–126 (2003b)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Structural realism and quantum gravity, in Structural Foundation of Quantum Gravity, ed. by D. Rickles, S. French, J. Saatsi (Oxford University Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Conceptual Issues in Quantum Gravity, an invited 50 minute talk delivered (on Aug 11, 2007), in The 13th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 9–15 Aug 2007, Beijing, China; unpubliahed, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, From Current Algebra to Quantum Chromodynamics—A Case for Structural Realism (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Key steps toward the creation of QCD—Notes on the logic and history of the genesis of QCD, in What We Would Like LHC to Give Us, ed. by A. Zichichi (World Scientific, 2014a), pp. 139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, Incomplete, but real—A constructivist account of reference. Epistemol. Philos. Sci. 41(3), 72–81 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Cao, The hole argument and the nature of spacetime—a critical review from a constructivist perspective, in Einstein, Tagore and the nature of Reality, ed. by P. Ghose (Routledge, 2016), pp. 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap, Logische Syntax der Sprache. (English translation 1937, The Logical Syntax of Language. Kegan Paul), 1934

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap, Empirecism, semantics and ontology, in Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 4, pp. 20–40, 1950. Also in Carnap (1956), 205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • S. French, J. Ladyman, Remodelling structural realism: quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese 136, 31–56 (2003a)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • S. French, J. Ladyman, Between platonism and phenomenalism: Reply to Cao. Synthese 136, 73–78 (2003b)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University (CSLI Publications, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, Einstein, Kant, and the relativized a priori, in Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics, ed. by M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, J. Petitot (Springer, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, Kuhnian approach to the history and philosophy of science. Monist 93, 497–517 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, Extending the dynamics of reason. Erkenntnis 75, 431–444 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, Reconsidering the dynamics of reason. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 43, 47–53 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, Neo-Kantianism, scientific realism, and modern physics, in Scientific Metaphysics, ed. by D. Ross, J. Ladyman, H. Kincaid, (Oxford University Press, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman, A Post-Kuhnian Philosophy of Science. Spinoza Lectures. (Van Gorcum, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second enlarged edition University of Chicago Press, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.S. Kuhn, The Road Since Structure (University of Chicago Press, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Massimi (ed.), Kant and Philosophy of Science Today (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. PoincarĂ©, La science et l’hypothese (Flammarion, Paris, 1902)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Redhead, The intelligibility of the universe, in Philosophy at the New Millennium, ed by A. O’Hear (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell, The Analysis of Matter (Kegan Paul, London, 1927)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Schlick, General Theory of Knowledge (trans. By A.E. Blumberg, H. Feigl, Springer, New York, 1918)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Simons, Particulars in Particular Clothing: Three Trope Theories of Substance. Res. 54, 553–574 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Sneed, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics (Reidel, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Stegmuller, The Structuralist Vierw of Theories (Springer, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.C. Wimsatt, Evolution, Entrenchnebt, and Innateness, in Reductionism and the Development of Knowledge, ed by T. Brown, L. Smith, Mahwah, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Worrall, Structural realism: the best of both worlds? Dialectica 43, 99–124 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Worrall, Reason om Revolution: a study of Theory-Change in Science (Oxford University Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Yu Cao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cao, T.Y. (2018). Scientific Realism in the Post-Kuhnian Times. In: Wuppuluri, S., Doria, F. (eds) The Map and the Territory. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72478-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics