Abstract
John Dewey’s theory of truth is widely viewed as proposing to substitute “warranted assertibility” for “truth,” a proposal that has faced serious objections since the late 1930s. By examining Dewey’s theory in its historical context – and, in particular, by drawing parallels with Otto Neurath’s concurrent attempts to develop a non-correspondence, non-formal theory of truth – I aim to shed light on Dewey’s underlying objectives. Dewey and Neurath were well-known to each other and, as their writing and correspondence make clear, they took similar paths over the mid-century philosophical terrain. I conclude that Dewey’s account of truth is more principled, and more relevant to historical debates, than it first appears.
Anderson, E. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy.” Episteme 3, 8–22.10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8Search in Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1952. Language, Truth and Logic. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Boncompagni, A. 2017. “Wittgenstein and Pragmatism: A Neglected Remark in Manuscript 107 (1930).” In Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology Before the Great Divide. Eds. M. Baghramian/S. Marchetti. New York, 168–184.10.4324/9781315106236-8Search in Google Scholar
Bourget, D./Chalmers, D. 2014. “What Do Philosophers Believe?” Philosophical Studies 170, 465–500.10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7Search in Google Scholar
Britton, K. 1947. “Truth and Knowledge: Some Comments on Russell.” Analysis 8, 39–43.10.1093/analys/8.3.39Search in Google Scholar
Burke, T. 1994. Dewey’s New Logic: A Reply to Russell. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Capps, J. 2017. “A Pragmatic Argument for a Pragmatic Theory of Truth.” Contemporary Pragmatism 14, 135–56.10.1163/18758185-01402001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018. “Did Dewey Have a Theory of Truth?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54, 39–63.10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.54.1.03Search in Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1946. “Remarks on Induction and Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6, 590–602.10.2307/2103107Search in Google Scholar
Cat, J./Tuboly, A. T. 2019. Neurath Reconsidered: New Sources and Perspectives. Cham.10.1007/978-3-030-02128-3Search in Google Scholar
Dennes, W. 1940. Review of Logic: The Theory of Inquiry by John Dewey. The Philosophical Review 49, 259–61.10.2307/2180803Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1909. “The Dilemma of the Intellectualist Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6, 433–34.10.2307/2010891Search in Google Scholar
–. 1910/2008. “A Short Catechism Concerning Truth.” In The Middle Works, Volume 6. Ed. J. A. Boydston. Carbondale, IL, 3–11.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1911/2008a. “The Problem of Truth.” In The Middle Works, Volume 6. Ed. J. A. Boydston. Carbondale, IL, 12–68.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1920/2008b. Reconstruction in Philosophy. The Middle Works, Volume 12. Ed. J. A. Boydston. Carbondale, IL.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1934. “Meaning, Assertion and Proposal.” Philosophy of Science 1, 237–38.10.1086/286321Search in Google Scholar
–. 1938/1991. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. The Later Works, Volume 12. Ed. J. A. Boydston. Carbondale, IL.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1939. “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder.” In The Philosophy of John Dewey. Eds. P. A. Schilpp/L. E. Hahn. Chicago, 517–608.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1941. “Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth,” Journal of Philosophy, 38, 169–86.10.2307/2017978Search in Google Scholar
–. 1999. The Correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952 (Vols I–IV). Electronic Edition. Charlottesville.Search in Google Scholar
Eames, S. M. 1961. “Dewey’s Views of Truth, Beauty, and Goodness.” Educational Theory 11, 174–85.10.1111/j.1741-5446.1961.tb00058.xSearch in Google Scholar
Festenstein, M. 2019. “Does Dewey have an ‘Epistemic Argument’ for Democracy?” Contemporary Pragmatism 16, 217–41.10.1163/18758185-01602005Search in Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1935. “On the Logical Positivists’ Theory of Truth.” Analysis 2, 49–59.10.1093/analys/2.4.49Search in Google Scholar
Hinshaw, V. G. 1944. “The Pragmatist Theory of Truth.” Philosophy of Science 11, 82–92.10.1086/286827Search in Google Scholar
Joachim, H. 1906. The Nature of Truth. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F. 1940. “On Dewey’s Logic.” Social Research 7, 243–46.Search in Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2013. “Toward a Pragmatist Philosophy of Science.” Theoria 77, 185–231.10.1387/theoria.7014Search in Google Scholar
Knight, J./Johnson, J. 2011. The Priority of Democracy. Princeton, NJ.10.23943/princeton/9780691151236.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Laird, J. 1939. Review of Logic: The Theory of Inquiry by John Dewey. Mind 48, 527–36.10.1093/mind/XLVIII.192.527Search in Google Scholar
Lamont, C. 1959. Dialogue on John Dewey. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Lavine, T. 1990. Introduction to The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 16, ix–xxxvii. Ed. J. A. Boydston. Carbondale, IL.Search in Google Scholar
Limbeck-Lilienau, C. 2012. “Carnap’s Encounter with Pragmatism.” In Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism, Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Ed. R. Creath. Berlin, 89–111.10.1007/978-94-007-3929-1_6Search in Google Scholar
Lynch, M. 2009. Truth as One and Many. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218738.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mancosu, P. 2008. “Tarski, Neurath, and Kokoszyńska on the Semantic Conception of Truth.” In New Essays on Tarski and Philosophy. Ed. D. Patterson. New York, 192–224.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296309.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
McGilvary, E. B./Watts Cunningham, G./Lewis, C. I./Nagel, E. 1939. “A Symposium of Reviews of John Dewey’s Logic: The Theory of Inquiry.” Journal of Philosophy 36, 561–81.10.2307/2018151Search in Google Scholar
McIntyre, L. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Misak, C. 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality. London.10.4324/9780203283523Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007. “Pragmatism and Deflationism.” In New Pragmatists. Ed. C. Misak. New York, 68–90.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2013. The American Pragmatists. New York/Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2016a. “The Subterranean Influence of Pragmatism on the Vienna Circle: Peirce, Ramsey, Wittgenstein.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v4i5.2946.10.15173/jhap.v4i5.2946Search in Google Scholar
–. 2016b. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712077.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mormann, T. 1999. “Neurath’s Opposition To Tarskian Semantics.” Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 6, 165–78.10.1007/978-94-017-0689-6_14Search in Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. 1935. “Philosophy of Science and Science of Philosophy.” Philosophy of Science 2, 271–86.10.1086/286375Search in Google Scholar
Neurath, O. 1931a/1983. “Physicalism.” In Philosophical Papers 1931–1946, 52–57. Eds. R. S. Cohen/M. Neurath. Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-6995-7_5Search in Google Scholar
–. 1931b/1983. “Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism.” In Philosophical Papers 1931–1946. Eds. R. S. Cohen/M. Neurath. Dordrecht, 58–90.10.1007/978-94-009-6995-7_6Search in Google Scholar
–. 1940. “Universal Jargon and Terminology.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 41, 127–48.10.1007/978-94-009-6995-7_21Search in Google Scholar
–. 1944. “Foundations of the Social Sciences.” Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
O’Connor, C./Weatherall, J. O. 2019. The Misinformation Age. New Haven.10.12987/9780300241006Search in Google Scholar
Perkins, M. 1952. “Notes on the Pragmatic Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 49, 573–87.10.4324/9781003059974-15Search in Google Scholar
Pihlström, S. 2017. “Logical Empiricism Between Pragmatism and Neopragmatism.” In Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology Before the Great Divide. Eds. M. Baghramian/S. Marchetti. New York, 251–68.10.4324/9781315106236-12Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, R. A. 2010. “Dewey’s Epistemology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Dewey. Ed. M. Cochran. New York, 34–54.10.1017/CCOL9780521874564.003Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 2008. Quine in Dialogue. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674278134Search in Google Scholar
Ratner, S. 1958. “Arthur F. Bentley, 1870–1957.” Journal of Philosophy 55, 573–78.10.2307/2021963Search in Google Scholar
Reisch, G. A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511610318Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, A. W. 2002. “Engineering Philosophy of Science: American Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism in the 1930s.” Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002, S36–S47.10.1086/341766Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, H. S. 1998. “Truth and Ends in Dewey’s Pragmatism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (suppl. 1), 109–47.10.1080/00455091.1998.10717497Search in Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1906. “What Is Truth?” The Independent Review 9 (June issue), 349–53.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1939. “Dewey’s New Logic.” In The Philosophy of John Dewey. Eds. P. A. Schilpp/L. E. Hahn. Chicago, 137–56.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1940. An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth. London.10.4324/9780203714331Search in Google Scholar
–. 1946. A History of Western Philosophy. London.Search in Google Scholar
Sebestik, J. 2011. “Otto Neurath’s Epistemology and Its Paradoxes.” In Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Eds. J. Symons/O. Pombo/J. M. Torres. Berlin, 41–58.10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_4Search in Google Scholar
Singer, M. G. 1951. “Formal Logic and Dewey’s Logic.” Philosophical Review 60, 375–85.10.2307/2181875Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. 1952. “Pragmatism, Realism and Positivism in the United States.” Mind 61, 190–208.10.1093/mind/LXI.242.190Search in Google Scholar
Talisse, R./Aikin, S. 2008. Pragmatism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London.Search in Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1947. “Two Theories of Truth: The Relation Between the Theories of John Dewey and Bertrand Russell.” Journal of Philosophy 44, 516–27.10.2307/2019905Search in Google Scholar
Uebel, T. E. 1991. “Neurath’s Programme for Naturalistic Epistemology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22, 623–46.10.1016/0039-3681(91)90036-RSearch in Google Scholar
–. 1992. Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism in the Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate. Amsterdam.10.1163/9789004458192Search in Google Scholar
–. 1999. “Otto Neurath, the Vienna Circle and the Austrian Tradition.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 44, 249–69.10.1017/CBO9780511524110.014Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. “European Pragmatism? Further Thoughts on the German and Austrian Reception of American Pragmatism.” In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Eds. M. C. Galavotti/D. Dieks/W. Gonzalvez/S. Hartmann/T. Uebel/M. Weber. Dordrecht, 627–44.10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_44Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. “American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v3i3.3910.15173/jhap.v3i3.39Search in Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. 1991. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY.10.7591/9781501702044Search in Google Scholar
Woleński, J. 1994. “Contributions to the History of the Classical Truth-Definition.” Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 9, 481–95.10.1016/S0049-237X(06)80058-3Search in Google Scholar
Young, J. O. 1991. “Coherence, Anti-Realism and the Vienna Circle.” Synthese 86, 467–82.10.1007/BF00485271Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, A. 2018. Belief: A Pragmatic Picture. New York.10.1093/oso/9780198809517.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
