Skip to main content
Log in

Husserl and Foucault on the historical apriori: teleological and anti-teleological views of history

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that Husserl and Foucault use the striking phrase “the historical apriori” at certain key points in their work. Yet most commentators agree that the two thinkers mean very different things by this expression, and the question is why these two authors would employ the same terms for such different purposes. Instead of pursuing this question directly I want to look from a broader perspective at the views of history that are reflected in the different uses of this expression. Husserl and Foucault may be said to represent teleological and anti-teleological views of history respectively. Foucault often says that phenomenology represents the view to which he is most opposed, and in most of these remarks it is the subject-centered character of phenomenology to which he most objects. But I think he also sees Husserl as the latest representative of a teleological view of history and of knowledge that descends from Hegel and the enlightenment and is characteristic of modernity as a whole. Foucault’s work mounts a full-scale attack on this view of history, and this is one of the ways in which Foucault’s thought contrasts with Husserl’s. I argue that Foucault’s view is anti-teleological rather than simply non-teleological, since almost invariably he develops his view by uprooting the assumptions of his opponents. At the end of the paper I come back to the expression “historical apriori,” as used by Husserl and Foucault, and discuss it briefly in light of what I have said.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bambach, Charles. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey and the crisis of historicism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwith, Karl. 1949. Meaning in history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Carr.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Husserl abbreviations

  • C The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. David Carr (Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.

  • FTL Formal and Transcendental Logic. Dorion Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.

Appendix 2: Foucault abbreviations

  • AK The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon, 1972.

  • OT The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage, 1970.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carr, D. Husserl and Foucault on the historical apriori: teleological and anti-teleological views of history. Cont Philos Rev 49, 127–137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-015-9362-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-015-9362-0

Keywords

Navigation