Skip to main content
Log in

Lakatos und Bohrs Programm

Entgegnung auf eine Kritik von Hans Radder

  • Diskussion
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a paper published in this Journal, Hans Radder argues that a detailed analysis of the degenerating phase of Bohr's programme reveals the basic incorrectness of Lakatos' own reconstruction of this period. Furthermore the corrected version shows the impossibility to account for the development in Lakatosian concepts. In this reply I try to point out that a slight modification of Lakatos' reconstruction is sufficient for reconciling the theory with the historical data. It is not Lakatos's theory itself that causes the problems, but Radder's way of its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Hans Radder, An Immanent Criticism of Lakatos' Account of the „Degenerating Phase“ of Bohr's Atomic Theory, in: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XIII (1982) S. 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans Radder, Between Bohr's Atomic Theory and Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics. A Study of the Role of the Dutch Physicist H. A. Kramers, in: Janus LX/X (1982), S. 223–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrier, M. Lakatos und Bohrs Programm. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 14, 368–371 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801656

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801656

Navigation