Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanism as a scientific pluralism in the early modern medicine and natural philosophy

Peter Distelzweig, Benjamin Goldberg and Evan R. Ragland (eds): Early modern medicine and natural philosophy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2016, x + 372 pp, €99.99HB

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bontekoe, Cornelis. 1688. Metaphysica, Et liber singularis de motu, oeconomia animalis. Lyon: Jean de Viver et F. Haaring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Erik-Jan (ed.). 2002. The correspondence between Descartes and Henricus Regius. Utrecht: The Leiden Research Institute of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Desmond M. 2007. La théorie des passions selon Louis de La Forge. In Conceptions de la science: hier, aujourd’hui, demain: Hommage à Marjorie Grene, ed. Jean Gayon, and Richard M. Burian, 214–227. Bruxelles: Ousia.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Roger. 2000. The languages of William Harvey’s natural philosophy. In Ancients and moderns in the medical sciences. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • French, Roger. 1989. Harvey in Holland: Circulation and the calvinists. In The medical revolution of the seventeenth century, ed. Roger French, and Andrew Wear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • French, Roger. 1994. William Harvey’s natural philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, William. 1660 (1628). Exercitationes anatomicae de motu cordis et sanguinis circulatione. Rotterdam: Arnold Leers.

  • Israel, Jonathan. 2007. Radical enlightenment and the medical revolution of the late XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries. In Medicine and religion in enlightenment Europe, ed. Ole Peter Grell, and A. Cunningham. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolesnik-Antoine. 2012. Les voix du corps. Schuyl, Clerselier et La Forge lecteurs du Traité de l’Homme de Descartes. In Consecutio temporum, Revisita critica delle postmodernità, F. Toto, R. Finelli ed.

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. 2014. Cours sur la volonté. UCL: Presses universitaires de Louvain, Ch. Perrin.

  • Pagel, Walter. 1976. New light on William Harvey. Basel: Karger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, Walter. 1967. William Harvey’s biological ideas, 1967. Basel, NY: S. Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecquet, J. 1652. Dissertatio anatomica de circulatione sanguinis et chyli motu. In Experimenta nova anatomica. Paris: Sébastien Cramoisy.

  • Sawday, Jonathan. 1995. The body emblazoned. Dissection and the human body in renaissance culture. London & NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 1988. René Descartes et Martin Schoock. La querelle d’Utrecht. Paris: Les impressions nouvelles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecole Centrale de Lyon – IHRIM UMR 5317, 36 avenue Guy de Collongue, 69134, Ecully Cedex, France

    Sarah Carvallo

Authors
  1. Sarah Carvallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Carvallo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvallo, S. Mechanism as a scientific pluralism in the early modern medicine and natural philosophy. Metascience 26, 41–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0149-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0149-7

Search

Navigation