Abstract
The nature of moral values has occupied philosophers and educationalists for centuries and a variety of claims have been made about their origin and status. One tradition suggests they may be thoughts in the mind of God; another that they are eternal truths to be reached by rational reflection (much like the truths of mathematics) or alternatively through intuition; another that they are social conventions; and another (from the logical positivists) that they are not verifiable facts but simply the expression of emotional likes and dislikes. Standard introductory texts (e.g., Bowie 2004; Vardy and Grosch 1999) on the subject of ethics rarely mention Darwin or Darwinism (Mepham 2005 is a useful exception) possibly mindful of the fact that the relationship of evolutionary biology to moral questions has had a troublesome history. The effect of this has been that whole generations of moral philosophers have given the biological sciences a wide berth and consequently often remain poorly informed about recent advances in evolutionary thought and the neurosciences. On the other hand, scientists have developed interesting models of the evolution of the moral sentiments and are using new imaging techniques to explore the centres of the brain associated with emotion and motivation, but many have been fearful of committing the naturalistic fallacy and so have steered clear of extrapolating their findings to ethical questions. No one after all wants to be seen to be committing an elementary logical blunder. But in the last 20 years, evolutionary biologists have regained the confidence to explore the implications of evolution for the study of ethics (de Waal 1996; Wilson 1998; Wright 1994; Greene 2003). This paper is designed to encourage those entrusted with the teaching of ethics to be open to the potential of Darwinism as a source of ideas on the origins and status of ethical thought and behaviour. It is also hoped that it will illustrate for science educators the enormous explanatory power inherent in Darwinian thought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruter.
Allchin, D. (1999). Teaching Darwin seriously: Addressing evolution and ethics. American Biology Teacher, 61, 350–355.
Allchin, D. (2007). Social un-darwinism. American Biology Teacher, 69, 113–115.
Arnhart, L. (2005). Incest taboo as Darwinian natural right. In A. P. Wolf & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Inbreeding, Incest and the Incest taboo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of co-operation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.
Barash, D. (1982). Sociobiology and behaviour. New York: Elsevier.
Barash, D. (2003). The survival game. New York: Times Books.
Bevc, I., & Silverman, I. (1993). Early proximity and intimacy between siblings and incestuous behaviour: A test of the Westermarck hypothesis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 171–181.
Bittles, A. H. (1995). The influence of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behaviour in India and Pakistan. In C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor & A. J. Boyce (Eds.), Mating patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bittles, A. H. (2004). Genetic aspects of inbreeding and incest. In A. P. Wolf & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest and the incest taboo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bittles, A. H., & Makov, U. (1988). Inbreeding in human populations: Assessment of the costs. In C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor & A. J. Boyce (Eds.), Mating patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowie, R. (2004). Ethical studies. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181–206.
Cartwright, J. (2008). Evolution and human behaviour. London: Palgrave.
Chambers, R. (1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation (2nd ed.). London: John Churchill.
Committee on Culture, Science and Education. (2007). ‘The danger of creationism in education’, Council of Europe Doc. 11065.
Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curry, O. (2005). Morality as natural history. Ph.D. Thesis, London School of Economics (LSE), London.
Darwin, C. (1860). Letter to Charles Lyell, 25/2/1860. In F. Burkhardt & S. Smith (Eds.), The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991.
Darwin, C. (1906). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (2nd ed.). London: John Murray.
Darwin, F. (Ed.). (1887). The life and letters of Charles Darwin. London: John Murray.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Waal, F. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Delaney, T. (2009). Social spencerism. Philosophy Now, 71, 20–21.
Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. London: Allen Lane.
Ekman, P. (1973). Cross cultural studies of facial expressions. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression. London: Academic Press.
Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2004). Third-party attitudes towards sibling incest. Evidence for Westermarck’s hypotheses. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 25, 277–294.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., et al. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.
Greene, J. (2003). From neural ‘is’ to moral ‘ought’: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 846–849.
Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gwynne, D. T., & Simmons, L. W. (1990). Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature, 346, 172–174.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the pyschopaths among us. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Harpending, H., & Sobus, J. (1987). Sociopathy as an adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 63–72.
Huxley, T. H. (1894). Evolution and ethics. London: Macmillan and Co.
Huxley, L. (1900). Life and letters of T H Huxley 2 vols. New York: Appleton.
Kitcher, P. (1985). Vaulting ambition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lalumiere, M. L., & Seto, M. C. (1998). What’s wrong with psychopaths? Psychiatry Rounds, 2, 6.
Larson, E. J. (1997). Summer for the gods: The scopes trial and America’s continuing debate over science and religion. New York: Basic Books.
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., et al. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 270, 819–826.
Mealey, L. (1997). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. In S. Baron-Cohen (Ed.), The maladapted mind. Hove: Psychology Press.
Mepham, B. (2005). Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573–576.
O’Neill, P., & Petrinovich, L. (1998). A preliminary cross-cultural study of moral intuitions. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 19(6), 349–367.
Oldroyd, D. R. (1980). Darwinian impacts: An introduction to the Darwinian revolution. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. B. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan.
Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behaviour. Human Nature, 2, 271–291.
Petrinovich, L., O’Neill, P., et al. (1993). An empirical study of moral intuitions: Towards an evolutionary ethics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 467–478.
Pusey, A. (2004). Inbreeding avoidance in primates. In A. P. Wolf & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest and the incest taboo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Rachels, J. (1990). Created from animals: The moral implications of Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richards, J. R. (2000). Human nature after Darwin. London: Routledge.
Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen. London: Viking.
Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue. London: Viking (Penguin Group).
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., et al. (2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, 295(5), 30–37.
Roes, F. L., & Raymond, M. (2003). Belief in moralising gods. Evolution and Human behaviour, 24(2), 126–135.
Rutledge, M. L., & Sadler, K. C. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument with University students. The American Biology Teacher, 69, 332–335.
Schmitt, D. (2005). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104.
Schneider, M. A., & Hendrix, L. (2000). Olfactory sexual inhibition and the Westermarck effect. Human Nature, 11(1), 65–91.
Sherper, J. (1971). Mate selection among second generation kibbutz adolescents and adults: Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 1(4), 293–307.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
Singer, P. (1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Singer, P. (1998). Evolutionary workers’ party, The Times Higher Educational Supplement, 15 May, pp. 15–17.
Slevin, P. (2005). Battle on teaching evolution sharpens, Washington Post, p. A01.
Spain, D. H. (1991). Muddled theory and misinterpreted data. Behavioural and Brian Sciences, 14, 278–279.
Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. California: Benjamin Cummings.
Vardy, P., & Grosch, P. (1999). The puzzle of ethics. London: Harper Collins.
Walter, A. (2006). The anti-naturalistic fallacy: Evolutionary moral psychology and the insistence of brute facts. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 33–48.
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience. New York: Knopf.
Wolf, A. P. (1993). Westermarck redivivus. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22, 157–175.
Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal. London: Little, Brown and Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cartwright, J. Naturalising Ethics: The Implications of Darwinism for the Study of Moral Philosophy. Sci & Educ 19, 407–443 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9205-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9205-7