Skip to main content
Log in

Remarks on Probability

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bar-Hillel, Y. “A Note on State Descriptions,” Philosophical Studies, 2:72–75 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. —. “A Note on Comparative Inductive Logic,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3: 308–10 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carnap, R. “Testability and Meaning,” Philosophy of Science, 3:419–71 (1936), 4:1–38 (1937). Separately printed, New Haven, Conn.: Whitlock's, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. “Science and Analysis of Language,” Journal of Unified Science, 9:221–26 (1940). (Fifth International Congress for the Unity of Science, Cambridge, Mass., 1939.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. —. “On Inductive Logic,” Philosophy of Science, 12:72–97 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  6. —. “The Two Concepts of Probability,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5:513–32 (1945). Reprinted in H. Feigl and W. Sellars, eds., Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —. The Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —. The Continuum of Inductive Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —. “Meaning Postulates,” Philosophical Studies, 3:65–73 (1952). Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  10. —. “On the Comparative Concept of Confirmation,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3:311–18 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  11. —. “The Aim of Inductive Logic,” in Proceedings of the International Congress for Logic and Methodology of Science (Stanford, 1960). Stanford, Calif.: Stan ford University Press, 1962. Pp. 113–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. -. “Replies and Systematic Expositions,” to appear in Paul A. Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Forthcoming.

  13. Carnap, R., and W. Stegmüller. Induktive Logik und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Wien, 1959.

  14. Good, I. J. Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. London: C. Griffin; New York: Hafner, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kemeny, John G. “Carnap on Probability” (review of [7]), Review of Metaphysics, 5:145–56 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  16. —. “Extensions of the Methods of Inductive Logic,” Philosophical Studies, 3:38–42 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  17. —. “A Logical Measure Function,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 18:289–308 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Popper, K. Logik der Forschung. Wien: J. Springer, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  19. —. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (translation of [18]). London: Hutchinson, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savage, L. J. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Author's note: This paper is a slightly modified version of the preface to the second edition of my The Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962). In this edition, the text of the first edition of 1950 is reprinted without change, except for a number of small corrections. This paper is printed with the kind permission of the University of Chicago Press.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carnap, R. Remarks on Probability. Philos Stud 14, 65–75 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424563

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424563

Navigation