Abstract
Contributors to the debate surrounding the ethics of germ line gene manipulation have by and large concentrated their efforts on discussions of the potential risks that are associated with the use of this technology. Many international advisory committees have ruled out the acceptability of germ line gene manipulation at least for the time being. The purpose of this work is to generate much needed discussion on the many other ethical issues concerning the implementation of not only germ line gene manipulation but also other related biotechnologies. In this paper I systematically investigate and analyse the most salient issues put forward by proponents and opponents alike. I argue that if germ line manipulation proves to be a safe and effective procedure, then the principle of beneficence imposes on the medical profession a moral duty to pursue the technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Anderson, F. Human gene therapy: scientific and ethical considerations. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1985:10:275–291.
Baird, P. Altering human genes: social, ethical, and legal implications. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1994:37(4):566–575.
Berger, E. & Gert, B. Genetic disorders and the ethical status of germ-line gene therapy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991:16:667–683.
Bonnicksen, A. National and international approaches to human germ-line gene therapy. Politics and the Life Sciences 1994:13:39–49.
Chadwick, R. Playing god. Cogito 1989:3:186–193.
Courts, MC. Human gene therapy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1994:4(1):63–83.
De Wachter, M. Ethical aspects of human germ-line gene therapy. Bioethics 1993:7(2/3): 166–177
Drlica, Karl (1997) Understanding DNA and Gene Cloning, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Fletcher, J. & Anderson, W. Germ-line gene therapy: a new stage of debate. Law, Medicine and Healthcare 1992:20(1–2):26–39.
Fowler, G. et al. Germ-line gene therapy and the clinical ethos of medical genetics. Theoretical Medicine 1989:10:151–165.
Glannon, W. Genes, embryos, and future people. Bioethics 1998:12(3): 187–211.
Glover, J. What Sort of People Should There Be? Penguin Books, Hammondsworth, 1984
Grey, W. Playing god, in Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Chadwick, R. ed., Academic Press, 1998, pp. 525–530.
Hanser, M. Harming future people. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1990:19(1):47–70.
Harris, J. Wonderwoman and Superman: The Ethics of Human Biotechnology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992
Harris, J. Is gene therapy a form of eugenics? Bioethics 1993:7(2/3): 178–187.
Hayry, M. & Hayry, H. (Genetic engineering, in Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Chadwick, R. ed., Academic Press, 1998, pp.407–417.
Holtug, N. Altering humans — the case for and against human gene therapy. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 1997:6(2): 157–174.
Holtug, N. Human gene therapy: down the slippery slope? Bioethics 1993:7(5):402–419.
Juengst, E. Germ-line gene therapy — back to basics. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991:16(6):587–592.
Keenan, J. What is morally new in genetic manipulation? Human Gene Therapy 1990:1(3):289–298.
Lappé, M. Ethical issues in manipulating the human germ line. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991:16:621–639.
Lucassen, E. The ethics of genetic engineering. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1996:13(1):51–61.
Mauron, A. & Thévoz, J. Germ-line engineering: a few European voices. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991:16:667–683.
Moseley, R. Commentary: maintaining the somatic/germ-line distinction: some ethical drawbacks. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991:641–647.
Munson, R. & Davis, L. Germ-line gene therapy and the medical imperative. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1992:2(2): 137–158.
National Health and Medical Research Council (Ethical Aspects of Research on Human Gene Therapy, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1987
National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Ethical Review of Research Proposals for Human Somatic Cell Gene Therapy and Related Procedures, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1999
National Health and Medical Research Council Human Gene Therapy and Related Procedures, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1995
Resnik, D. Debunking the slippery slope argument against human germ-line gene therapy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1994:19:23–40.
Resnik, D. Genetic engineering and social justice: a Rawlsian approach. Social Theory and Practice 1997:23(3):427–448.
Richter, G. & Bacchetta, M. Interventions in the human genome: some moral and ethical considerations. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1998:23(3):303–317.
Rosenkratz, J. Custom kids and the moral duty to genetically engineer our children. High Technology Law Journal 1987:2(1): 1–53.
Singer, P. & Wells, D. The Reproduction Revolution: New Ways of Making Babies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984
Walters, L. & Palmer, J. The Ethics of Human Gene Therapy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997, pp. 60–98.
Williams, B. Which slopes are slippery? in Moral Dilemmas in Modern Medicine, Lockwood, M. ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985, pp. 126–137.
Wood-Harper, J. (Manipulation of the germ-line, in Ethics and Biotechnology, Dyson, A. & Harris, J. eds, Routledge, London, 1994, pp. 121–143.
Zimmerman, B. Human germ-line therapy: the case for its development and use. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991:16:593–612.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, L. The ethics of germ line gene manipulation — a five dimensional debate. Monash Bioethics Review 21, S66–S81 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351288
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351288