Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to my critics: Chris Pincock, Lisa Warenski and Jonathan Weinberg

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is my response to the papers by Chris Pincock, Lisa Warenski and Jonathan Weinberg, which were presented at the Book Symposium on my Essays on A Priori Knowledge and Justification, American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Meetings, March 16–19, 2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The argument is directed at Goldman (1999), who presses a similar concern.

References

  • Bealer, G. (1992). The incoherence of empiricism. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, 66, 99–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casullo, A. (2003). A priori justification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casullo, A. (2012). Essays on a priori knowledge and justification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casullo, A. (2013). Four challenges to the a priori—a posteriori distinction. Synthese,. doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0341-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1999). A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 13, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, J. (2013). Experimental philosophy and apriority. In A. Casullo & J. Thurow (Eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. S. (2008). Grounding concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

My thanks to Chris Pincock, Lisa Warenski and Jonathan Weinberg for their careful reading of my work and probing responses to it.  I regret that limitations of space prevent me from addressing all the issues that they raise.  Thanks also to Peter Graham for organizing and chairing the symposium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0321, USA

    Albert Casullo

Authors
  1. Albert Casullo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Casullo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casullo, A. Response to my critics: Chris Pincock, Lisa Warenski and Jonathan Weinberg. Philos Stud 173, 1705–1720 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0590-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0590-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation