Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deciding on Violence

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If we were to believe the popular press, it would seem that violence at work is an increasingly pressing concern for employees, employers and legislative bodies. In this paper we offer a set of philosophical reflections on violence, in order to clarify and destabilise some of the assumptions which run through many discussions of, and practical interventions into, violence in the workplace. Rather than focusing on violence ‘as such’, we consider various ways in which actions have been, and could be, represented as being violent. To this end, we identify a range of quite distinct representations of violence, and consider the grounds on which decisions are made about ‘what violence really is’. Refusing to see violence as a simple, obvious phenomenon or as indeterminate and infinitely open, we seek to deploy a deconstructive reading of decision in order to outline the broad contours of a critique of a certain common sense that sees violence only in individual acts of physical violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J Keane Reflections on Violence London: Verso 1996 p 3

    Google Scholar 

  2. A M O’Leary-Kelly, R W Griffin and D J Glew ‘Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research Framework’ Academy of Management Review 21:1 (1996) pp 225–253 citation on p 225 Management Review ‘M3 Facts: What Worries Companies Most?’ Management Review 88:7 (1999) p 9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amongst the many populist accounts of workplace violence and its posited spiralling frequency see, for example, H F Bensimon ‘Violence in the Workplace’ Training & Development (January 1994) pp 27–32; B Filipczak Armed and Dangerous at Work’ Training (July 1993) pp 39–43; P Johnson and J Indvik ‘Workplace Violence: An Issue of the Nineties’ PublicPersonnelManagement’23:4 (1994) pp 515–523; J. McCune ‘Companies Grapple with Workplace Violence’ Management Review 83:3 (1994) pp. 53–57; J McCune And You Thought TV was Violent’ Management Review 88:6(1999) p 8; J Quirk’ HR Managers Face Legal Aspects of Workplace Violence’ HRMagazine (November 1993) pp 115–122; S L Smith ‘Violence in the Workplace: A Cry for Help’ Occupational Hazards (October 1993) pp 29–33; P Stuart ‘Murder on the Job’ Personnel Journal 7:2 (1992) pp 72–84

  4. For what might be called ‘more robust’ or, at least, sensitive to theoretical concerns in theorising workplace violence see, for example, R A Baron and J H Neuman ‘Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence on their Relative Frequency and Potential Causes’ Aggressive Behavior 22 (1996) pp 161–173; J Hearn ‘The Organ ization(s) ofViolence: Men, Gender Relations, Organizations, and Violences’ Human Relations 47 (1994) pp 731–754; J Hearn The Violences of Men: How Men Talk About and How Agencies Respond to Men’s Violence to Women London: Sage, 1998; J Hearn ‘Organisation Violations in Practice: A Case Study in a University Setting’ Paper presented at the 19dl Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism: Organization(s), Institutions and Violence, Dublin, 30 July-4 August 2001; J Hearn and W Parkin Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations: The Unspoken Forces of Organization Violations London: Sage, 2001; S [instead ‘Abjection and Organization: Men, Violence, and Management’ Human Relations 50:9 (1997) pp 1115–1145; M J Martinko and K L Zellars ‘Toward a Theory of Workplace Violence and Aggression’ in R W Griffin, A M O’Leary- Kelly and J M Collins (eds.) DysftnctionalBehaviour in Organizations: Violent andDeviant Behaviour Stamford, Conn: JAI, (1998); J Neuman and R Baron ‘Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence Concerning Specific Forms, Potential Causes, and Preferred Targets’ Jo urnal of Management 24:3 (1998) pp 391–419; A M O’Leary-Kelly, RW Griffin and D J Glew ‘Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research Framework’ Academy of Management Review 21:1 (1996) pp 225–253 - In relation to violence and the philosophy of violence more generally, see H Arendt On Violence New York: Harcourt Brace, 1969; W Benjamin ‘Critique ofViolence’ in Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings New York: Schocken Books, 1986; J Gaining ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’ Journal of Peace Research 6:3 (1969) pp 167–191; J Gaining ‘Cultural Violence’ Journal of Peace Research 27:3 (1990) pp 291–305; N Garver ‘What Violence Is’ The Nation 209 (24 June 1968) pp 819–822; B Hanssen Critique ofViolence: Between Posts tructuralism and Critical Theory London: Routledge, 2000; J Keane Reflections on Violence London: Verso, 1996; G Sorel Refections on Violence London: Allen and Unwin 1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See D Richardson and H May ‘Deserving Victims? Sexual Status and the Social Construction of Violence’ Sociological Review 47:2 (1999) pp 308–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. This is not the place for a detailed exposition on questions related to representation. For an overview see S Hall (ed) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices London: Sage 1997

  7. A Giddens The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism Cambridge: Polity Press 1985 p 343

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giddens, ibid

  9. Note that this is not the only definition of violence in the Oxford English Dictionary, a point that is overlooked by many commentators. See, for example, C A J Coady ‘The Idea of ‘Violence’ Journal ofApplied Philosophy 3:1 (1986) pp 3–19 especially page 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E Q Bulatao and G R VandenBos ‘Workplace Violence: Its Scope and the Issues’ in G R VandenBos and E Q Bulatao (eds) Violence on the Job: Identifying Risks and Developing Solutions Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 1996 p 2

    Google Scholar 

  11. J L Austin How to do Things with Words Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. For an application of such ideas in organisation studies see A Sturdy and P Fleming ‘Talk as Technique: A Critique of the Words and Deeds Distinction in the Diffusion of Customer Service Cultures’ Journal of Management Studies, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Austin op dtp 12 emphasis in original.

  13. J Butler Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative New York: Routledge 1997

    Google Scholar 

  14. Butler op cit p 50

  15. C MacKinnon Only Words Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993; M J Matsuda, C R Lawrence, R Delgado and KW Crenshaw Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment Boulder: Westview 1993

    Google Scholar 

  16. In the language of speech act theory, this is to say that violent speech acts are not simply ‘perlocutionary’ but are ‘illocutionary’. 18 Cited in Butler, op dtp 6 ‘" Butler, op dtp 9

  17. Cited in Butler, op cit p 6

  18. Butler op cit 9

  19. This charge is not aimed ac Bucler, who explicitly emphasises the contextual and iterative dynamics of speech acts. In part this refers to our simplifying and all-too-sociological strategy of exposition in this paper, but also to a tendency in some versions of speech act theory to individualise and decontextualise. For a powerful early commentary, which seeks to open speech act theory to a radical thinking of context, see J Derrida ‘Signature, Event, Context’ in Margins of Philosophy London: Prentice Hall 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See J Galtung ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’ Journal of Peace Research 6:3 (1969) pp 167–191; J Galtung ‘Cultural Violence’ Journalof ‘Peace Research 27:3 (1990) pp 291 -305; N Garver ‘What Violence Is’ The Nation 209 (24 June 1968) pp 819–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M Weber ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in H H Gerth and C W Mills (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (1947) p 78 (emphasis in original). See also M Weber Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology Berkeley: University of California Press 1978 p 56

    Google Scholar 

  22. L Althusser ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation)’ in Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays London: New Left Books 1971 p 143

    Google Scholar 

  23. See, for one amongst many examples, C Alferoffand D Knights ‘Violence at Work: The Uneasy Process of re(form)ing the People-by-Numbers Approach. Captivating Hearts, Minds and Bodies?’ Paper presented at the 19th Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism: Organization(s), Institutions and Violence, Dublin 30 July-4 August 2001.

  24. F W Nietzsche Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No Owe Harmondsworth: Penguin 1969 p 69

    Google Scholar 

  25. P Fleming Changing Subjects of Control: An Analysis of Normative Regimes in the Workplace Unpublished Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 1999 p 1

    Google Scholar 

  26. The concepts of symbolic power and symbolic domination appear throughout Bourdieu’s work. For introductions, see P Bourdieu Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977; P Bourdieu ‘On Symbolic Power’ in J B Thompson (ed) Language and Symbolic Power Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991; P Bourdieu Masculine Domination Oxford: Polity Press 2001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. J B Thompson Studies in the Theory of Ideology Berkeley: University of California Press 1984 p 43

    Google Scholar 

  28. P Bourdieu Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1977 p 192

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Bourdieu ibid

  30. P Bourdieu and T Eagleton ‘Doxa and Common Life: An Interview’ in S Zizek (ed) Mapping Ideology London: Verso, 1994 p 266

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bourdieu and Eagleton op cit p 270

  32. Others, such as Oakes etal, discuss the introduction and operation of business planning in the management of museums and cultural heritage sites as symbolic violence. Through a process of naming, categorising and regularising, one set of meanings defined by the producers in the field gets replaced with another defined in reference to the external market. The resultant reorientation of values and the ‘necessary’ change in actions had a concrete impact on the identity (curator to entrepreneur) and the manner of control (professional to financial) of those in the organisation. Similarly, Torre ns focuses on the advertising of Jenny Craig as an exemplar of how weight loss advertising enacts symbolic violence on its consumers. As Garver remarks, theses forms of structural symbolic violence and structural physical violence are ‘as real, and as wicked as the thief with a knife." See L S Oakes, B Townley and D J Cooper ‘Business Planning as Pedagogy: Language and Control in a Changing Institutional Field’ Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (June 1998) pp 257–292; K M Torrens’ "I Can Get Any Job and Feel Like a Butterfly!" Symbolic Violence in the TV Advertising of Jenny Craig’ The Journal of Communication Inquiry 22:1 (1998) pp 27–47; N Garver ‘What Violence Is’ The Nation 209 (24 June 1968) pp 819–822 citation on p 822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S M Shannon and K Escamilla ‘Mexican Immigrants in U.S. Schools: Targets of Symbolic Violence’ Education Policy 13:3 (1999) pp 347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A similar analysis could be brought, to beat on the usage of Maori language in New Zealand. The Waitangi Tribunal, which was set up in 1985 to hear grievances resulting from the history of colonisation, found that the Maori language should be considered amongst the ‘precious gifts’ promised under the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, and that the acts of various parliaments and educational practices which effectively eliminated the Maori language should be considered a form of systematic (ie structural) harm.

  35. S Linstead ‘Abjection and Organization: Men, Violence, and Management’ Human Relations 50:9 (1997) pp 1115–1145 — See also the call for papers for the 19* Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism, Dublin, 30 July-4 August 2001, on the theme of ‘Organization(s), Institutions and Violence’ (www.scos.org). Also, J Hearn ‘The Organization (s) of Violence: Men, Gender, Relations, Organizations, and Violences’ Human Relations 47:6 (1994) pp 731–754 citation on p 735; B Fawcett, B Featherstone, J Hearn and CToft Violence and Gender Relations: Theories and Interventions London: Sage 1996 p 1 This issue with Linstead is, of course, considerably more complex that we are presenting hete. Although Linstead does at times move to explode the concept of violence, in other places he reverts to a ‘reductionist’ approach. This can be seen, for example, when he moves to give a concrete example of violence, and turns to a discussion of Alan Duff’s Once Were Warriors. In his analysis of this book, he uses the term ‘violence’ to tefer to the narrowest teptesentations of violence, what we have described above as ‘physical acts of violence’. In his move from the abstract to the concrete, it seems that Linstead ‘forgets’ some of his complaints against a reductionist approach to violence.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See J Derrick Of Gramma to logy Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press 1976. See also J Derrick ‘From Psyche: Invention of the Other’ in D Attridge (ed) Acts of Literature New York: Routledge 1992; J Derrida Aporias: Dying — Awaiting (one another at) the ‘Limits of Truth" Stanford: Stanford University Press 1993; J Derrida ‘Hospitality, Justice and Responsibility: A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida’ in R Kearney and M Dooley (eds) Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy London: Routledge 1999

    Google Scholar 

  37. For an introduction to deconstruction, and discussion of the uses of Derrida in organisation studies see C Jones ‘Jacques Derrida’ in S Linstead (ed) Postmodern Organization Theory London: Sage 2002

    Google Scholar 

  38. J Derrida ‘From Psyche: Invention of the Other’ in D Attridge (ed) Acts of Literature New York: Routledge 1992 p 328

    Google Scholar 

  39. J Derrida ‘Hospitality, Justice and Responsibility: A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida’ in R Kearney and M Dooley (eds) Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy London: Routledge 1999 p 66

    Google Scholar 

  40. Derrida op tit p 79 emphasis added.

  41. R Munro ‘Disposal of die Body: Upending Postmodernism’ ephemera: critical dialogues on organization 1:2 (2001) pp 108–130

    Google Scholar 

  42. M Foucault Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison London: Allen Lane 1977; M Foucault The History of Sexuality: An Introduction Vol 1 New York: Pantheon 1978

    Google Scholar 

  43. M Foucault The History of Sexuality: An Introduction Vol. 1 New York: Pantheon 1978 p 89

    Google Scholar 

  44. Butler op cit p 4

Download references

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 19th Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism, Dublin, 30 June–4 July 2001. Although this paper has been significantly revised and (we hope) improved somewhat, we have opted to retain something of the informal and conversational tone of that original presentation. In keeping with this spirit, the paper retains its provisional nature, and should be considered an invitation or provocation towards further thought, rather than a set of completed and final ‘conclusions’.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catley, B., Jones, C. Deciding on Violence. Philos. of Manag. 2, 23–32 (2002). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20022120

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20022120

Keywords

Navigation