No rule of principle could function in a moral context the way regulatory or defining rules function in games. It is as essential to the form of life called morality that rules so conceived be absent as it is essential to the form of life we call playing a game that they be present.
Stanley Cavell, The Claim of Reason, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999: 307.
Abstract
How do we take care of homeless people? A field study with a humanitarian NGO, the Samusocial de Paris, France, gave the author the opportunity to observe nursing and social work with homeless people. The first part of the article recounts how the public problem of “grande exclusion” emerged in France and the kind of value judgments and controversies it gave rise to. He accounts for his tactics not to take sides for any of the definitions and evaluations available in the public sphere, and to deconstruct the genesis of the public policy of “social emergency” that was built in response to “grande exclusion”. The second part of the article keeps on drawing on pragmatism, shifting from Dewey’s The Public and its Problems (1927) to his Theory of Valuation (1939). It describes social work and nursing as moral and political activities. Care is not only given in face to face relationships, it is also a distributed and coordinated activity, embodied into situational arrangements, made of procedures, technologies, institutions, and people. The author shows how a moral ethnography of outreach work with homeless people gives new insights on the valuation operations performed by professionals on the field. It opens new perspectives in the analysis of situated ethics, in connection with a sociology of public problems and public policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breviglieri, M. (2005). Bienfaits et méfaits de la proximité dans le travail social. In J. Ion (Ed.), Le travail social en débat(s) (pp. 219–234). Paris: La Découverte.
Breviglieri, M., Pattaroni, L., & Stavo-Debauge, J. (2003). Quelques effets de l’idée de proximité sur la conduite et le devenir du travail social. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 29(1), 141–157.
Castel, R. (2003). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Pub.
Cefaï, D. (2012). Comment généralise-t-on? Chronique d’une ethnographie de l’urgence sociale. In E. Desveaux & M. de Fornel (Eds.), Faire des sciences sociales: Généraliser (pp. 31–58). Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.
Cefaï, D. (2013). L’ordre public: Micropolitique de Goffman. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Comment se conduire dans les lieux publics: Notes sur l’organisation sociale des rassemblements [1963] (pp. 209–290). Paris: Economica.
Cefaï, D., & Gardella, E. (2011). L’Urgence sociale en action: Ethnographie du Samusocial de Paris. Paris: La Découverte.
Cefaï, D., & Terzi, C. (2012). Problèmes et problèmes publics: Revenir au pragmatisme. In D. Cefaï & C. Terzi (Eds), L’Expérience des problèmes publics (pp. 47). Paris: Editions de l’EHESS (series “Raisons pratiques” n 22).
Declerck, P. (2001). Les naufragés: Avec les clochards de Paris. Paris: Plon.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J., & Tufts, J. H. (1932). Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Co (revised edition).
Dodier, N. (1993). Action as a combination of common worlds. The Sociological Review, 41(3), 556–571.
Dodier, N. (2003). Leçons politiques de l’épidémie du sida. Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.
Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk, with Hakim Hasan and photos by Ovie Carter. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Emerson, R. M., & Messinger, S. (1977). Micropolitics of trouble. Social Problems, 25(2), 121–134.
Fassin, D. (2011). The humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gayet-Viaud, C. (2010). Du passant ordinaire au Samusocial: la (bonne) mesure du don dans la rencontre avec les sans-abri. Revue du Mauss semestrielle, 35, 247–265.
Geremek, B. (1994). Poverty: A history. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Boston: Northeastern Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.
Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public problems: The drinking-driving problem and the production of the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Honneth, A., (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Oxford: Polity Press.
James, W (1896/1956). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Dover.
Joseph, I. (2007). Le ressort politique de l’assistance, l’expérience de l’induction morale. Sur l’ethnographie des SDF. In L’Athlète moral et l’enquêteur modeste (pp. 413–436). Paris: Economica.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Marques, A. (2010). Construire sa légitimité au quotidien: Le travail micropolitique autour d’une Équipe mobile de psychiatrie-précarité. Paris: Ph.D. EHESS.
Paugam, S. (1991). La disqualification sociale: Essai sur la nouvelle pauvreté. Paris: PUF.
Pichon, P., Francq, B., Firdion, J.-M., Marpsat, M., Roy, S., & Soulet, P.-H. (2008). SDF, sans-abri, itinérant: Oser la comparaison. Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Simmel, G. (2001). The Pauper (1907). Corvallis, OR: Plutarch Press.
Vexliard, A. (1988). Le Clochard: Étude de psychologie sociale (1957). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code. The Hague: Mouton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cefaï, D. Outreach Work in Paris: A Moral Ethnography of Social Work and Nursing with Homeless People. Hum Stud 38, 137–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9328-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9328-y