Abstract
This article uses Memo Akten’s art installation Learning to See (Akten https://www.memo.tv/portfolio/learning-to-see/, 2017) to challenge the belief that machine learning and machine vision are neutral and objective technologies. Furthermore, this article follows Bernard Stiegler to contend that not only machine vision but also human vision is the result of constant training processes that rely directly on technology (understood as a technical surface of inscription). From this perspective, human vision is always already technical. Likewise, in an age dominated growingly by machine learning technologies, it is possible to speak not only of machine vision but also of a machinic imagination and a machinic unconscious, two notions that can be illustrated through Akten’s art installation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akten M (2015) Deepdream is blowing my mind. Medium. https://medium.com/@memoakten/deepdream-is-blowing-my-mind-6a2c8669c698. Accessed 1 July 2020
Akten M (2017) Learning to see. https://www.memo.tv/portfolio/learning-to-see/. Accessed 1 July 2020
Akten M (2019) Learning to see: you are what you see. ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Art Gallery. https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/15061/1/LearningToSee_AuthorVersion.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2020
Anderson C (2008) The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete, wired. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/. Accessed 1 July 2020
Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S, Kirchner L (2016) Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica.org. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. Accessed 1 July 2020
Benjamin W (2008) Little history of photography. In: Jennings M, Doherty B, Levin T (eds) The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility and other writings on media. Harvard University Press, London, pp 274–298
Boyer E (2015) Le Conflit des perceptions. éditions MF, Paris
Buolamwini J, Gebru T (2018) Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Paper presented at the 1st conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, New York. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a/buolamwini18a.pdf
Burnham C (2018) Does the internet have an unconscious?. Bloomsbury Academic, New York
Danks D, London AJ (2017) Algorithmic bias in autonomous systems. In: Paper presented at the twenty-sixth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Melbourne. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/philosophy/docs/london/IJCAI17-AlgorithmicBias-Distrib.pdf
Derrida J (1973) Speech and phenomena. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Derrida J (1978) Freud and the scene of writing, writing and difference. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 196–231
Dreyfus H (1991) Being-in-the-world. The MIT Press, London
Eubanks V (2018) Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, New York
Farocki H (2009) Cross influence/soft montage. In: Ehmann A, Eshun K (eds) Harun Farocki: Against what? Against whom?. Koenig Books, London, pp 69–74
Flusser V (2000) Towards a philosophy of photography. Reaktion Books, London
Fry H (2018) Hello world: how to be human in the age of the machine. W. W. Norton & Company, New York
Garcia M (2016) Racist in the machine: the disturbing implications of algorithm bias. World Policy J 33(4):111–117
Goodman B, Flaxman S (2016) EU regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. In: Paper presented at the ICML workshop on human interpretability in machine learning, New York. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813
Greenfield A (2017) Radical technologies: the design of everyday life. Verso, London
Heidegger M (2008) Being and time. HarperCollins, New York
Husserl E (1983) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. MartinusNijhoff Publishers, The Hague
Marx K (1973) Grundrisse: foundations of the critique of political economy (Nicolaus M, Trans.). Random House; Penguin, New York
Mordvintsev A, Tyka M (2015) Inceptionism: going deeper into neural networks. Google AI Blog, 2019. https://ai.googleblog.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html. Accessed 1 July 2020
Paglen T (2016) A study of invisible images. https://www.metropictures.com/exhibitions/trevor-paglen4/press-release(press release). Accessed 1 July 2020
Pasquale F (2015) The black box society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Rorty R (1991) Solidarity or objectivity? Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge University Press, New York
Steyerl H (2017) A sea of data: apophenia and pattern (mis)recognition. Duty free art: arte in the age of planetary civil war. Verso, London
Stiegler B (2010) For a new critique of political economy. Wiley, Hoboken
Stiegler B (2011) Technics and time, 3: cinematic time and the question of malaise. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Stiegler B (2016) Ars and organological inventions in societies of hyper-control. Leonardo 49(5):480–484
Virilio P (1994) The vision machine. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis
Zarsky T (2011) Governmental data mining and its alternatives. Penn State Law Rev 116(2):285–330
Zylinska J (2017) Nonhuman PHOTOGRAPHY. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Funding
This article was supported by CONICYT (Chile) under the Grant Fondecyt No. 11170065.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Celis Bueno, C., Schultz Abarca, M.J. Memo Akten’s Learning to See: from machine vision to the machinic unconscious. AI & Soc 36, 1177–1187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01071-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01071-2