Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Persistent Vegetative State: Clinical and Ethical Issues

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coma, vegetative state, lock-in syndrome and akinetic mutism are defined. Vegetative state is a state with no evidence of awareness of self or environment and showing cycles of sleep and wakefulness. PVS is an operational definition including time as a variable. PVS is a vegetative state that has endured or continued for at least one month. PVS can be diagnosed with a reasonable amount of medical certainty; however, the diagnosis of PVS must be kept separate from the outcome. The patient outcome can be predicted based on etiology and age. Using outcome probabilities and etiology as criteria, patients can be subdivided in 5 groups and reasonable management guidelines can be suggested. Three levels of care can be provided to PVS patients: high technology, supportive and compassionate care. Pragmatic options for the various subgroups of patients are suggested. Management decisions will remain difficult for both the family and the health-care team. The role of the physician in these difficult cases is to share the decision-making with the family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Plum F, Posner JB. The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1980: 5–6.

  2. Cranford RE. The persistent vegetative state: The medical reality (getting the facts straight). Hastings Cent Rep 1988; 18: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Practice parameters: assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology [see comments]. Neurology 1995; 45: 1015–1018.

  4. Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1995; 76: 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ANA Committee on Ethical Affairs. Persistent Vegetative State: report of the American Neurological Association Committee on Ethical Affairs. Ann Neurol 1993; 33: 386–390.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS, Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1572–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peres J. Cop's coma miracle revives a debate over patient care. Chicago Tribune. Section 2, Feb 23; 1996.

  8. Anonymous. To him, it was still 1988: the “coma cop” awakens. Newsweek 56 Feb 26; 1996.

  9. Bacon F. Novum Organum, Aphorisms XLIII. Londini, Apud Joannem Billium, Typographum Regium c. 1620.

  10. Childs NL, Mercer WN, Childs HV. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology 1993; 43: 1465–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jennett B, and Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1972; 1: 734–737.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weir RF, Gostin L. Decision to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. JAMA 1990; 264: 1846–1853.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brody BA. Ethical questions raised by the persistent vegetative patient. Hasting Cent Rep 1988; 18: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Papastrat LA. Guidelines for Reserving Traumatic Brain Injury. Princeton NJ: American Re-Insurance Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto T et al. Characterization and modification of brain activity with deep brain stimulation in patients in a persistent vegetative state: pain-related late positive component of cerebral evoked potential. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991; 14: 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wood RL. Critical analysis of the concept of sensory stimulation for patients in vegetative states. Brain Inj 1991; 5: 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wood RL, Witowski TB, Miller JL. et al. Evaluating sensory regulation as a method to improve awareness in patients with altered states of consciousness: a pilot study. Brain Inj 1992; 6: 411–418.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calman KC. The ethics of allocation of scarce health care resources: a view from the center. J Med Ethics 1994; 20: 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Persistent vegetative state and the decision to withdraw or withhold life support. JAMA 1990; 263: 426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alpert JS. Persistent vegetative state: where do we go from here? Arch Int Med 1991; 151: 855–856.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berrol S. Persistent vegetative state. Phys Med Rehab 1990; 4: 559–567.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spudis EW. The persistent vegetative state. J Neurol Sci 1990; 102: 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party on the Ethics of Prolonging Life and Assisting Death. Withdrawal of life support from patients in a persistent vegetative state. Lancet 1991; 337: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haggish K, Haitian M, Abaca S, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients with persistent vegetative state. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatr 1981; 44: 552–554.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Withdrawal of life support from patients in a persistent vegetative state. Institute of Medical Ethic Working Party on Ethics of Prolonged Life and Assisting Death. Lancet 1991; 337: 96–98.

  26. Munsat TL, Stuart WH, Cranford RE. Guidelines of the vegetative state: Commentary on the American Academy of Neurology Statement. Neurology 1989; 39: 123–12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown J. The persistent vegetative state: Time for caution? Postgraduate Med J 1990; 66: 697–698.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wikler D. Not dead, not dying? Ethical categories and persistent vegetative state. Hastings Cent Rep 1988; 18: 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brody BA. Ethical questions raised by the persistent vegetative patient. Hastings Cent Rep 1988; 18: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Council on Scientific Affairs and Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Persistent vegetative state and the decision to withdraw or withhold life support. Council report. JAMA 1990; 263: 426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pius XII Address to an international group of physicians February 24, 1997, III:AAS 49: 1–147.

  32. Keenan JF, Sheenan M. Life supports, Sorting bishops' views Church 1992: 10–17.

  33. Newman LE. Jewish theology and bioethics. J Med Philos 1992; 17: 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosner F, Bleich JD. Eds. Jewish Bioethics. New York: Sanherin Press 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thomasma DC. Foreword. In: EH Loewy (ed) Suffering and the beneficent community. Beyond Libertarianism. Albany: State University of New York Press 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Levy DE, Caronna JJ, Singer BH, Lapinski RH, Frydman H, Plum F. Predicting outcome from hypoxic-ischemic coma. JAMA 1985; 253: 1420–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Levy DE, Bates D, Coronna JJ et al. Prognosis in nontraumatic coma. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94: 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hamel MB, Goldman L, Teno J et al. Identification of comatose patients at high risk for death or severe disability. JAMA 1995; 273: 1842–1848.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barnet JL. Ethical Issues in Neurology. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Braakman R, Jenett WB, Minderhound JM. Prognosis of the posttraumatic vegetative state. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1988; 95: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sazbon L, Fuchs C, Costeff H. Prognosis for recovery from prolonged posttraumatic unawareness: logistic analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sazbon L, Groswasser Z. Medical complications and mortality of patients in the postcomatose unawareness (PC-U) state. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 112: 110- 112.

    Google Scholar 

  43. The Medical Task Force on Anencephaly: the infant with anencephaly. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 669–676.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ashwal S. The persistent vegetative state in children. Advances in Pediatrics 1994; 41: 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shewmon DA, Holmes GL. Braistem plasticity in congenitally decerebrate children. Brain Dev 1990;12:664. 46. Groswasser Z. Sazbon L. Outcome in 134 patients with prolonged posttraumatic unawareness. Part 2. Functional outcome of 72 patients recovering consciousness. J Neurosurg1990; 72: 81–84. 47. In re Quinlan, 70 NJ 10, 355 A2d 647, cert denied sub nom. Garger v New Jersey, 429 US 922 (1976). 48. Supreme Court of New Jersey In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, vol 2. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America, 1977. 49. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Dept. of Health. 110 S Ct 2841, 1990. 50. Perkins HS, Bauer RL, Hazuda HP, et al. Impact of legal liability, family wishes, and other “external factors” on physicians' life-support decisions. Am J Med1990; 89: 185–194. 51. La Puma J. Stocking CB. Silverstein MD. et al. An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital. Utilization and evaluation. JAMA1988; 260: 808–811. 52. Graham DI, McLellan D, Adams JH, et al. The neuropathology of the vegetative state and severe disability after non-missile head injury. Acta Neuroch1983; 32: 65–67. 53. Arseni C, Nereantiu F, Carp N. Persistent vegetative state after trauma. A clinicopathologic study. Acta Neuroch1981; 59: 45–53. 54. McQuillen MP. Can people who are unconscious or in the “vegetative state” perceive pain? Issues in Law and Medicine1991; 6: 373–383. 55. Daroff RB. The American Neurological Association survey results on PVS. Presented at the 115th annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, Atlanta, October 14–17, 1990. 56. Tommasino C. Grana C. Lucignani G. Torri G. Fazio F. Regional cerebral metabolism of glucose in comatose and vegetative state patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1995; 7: 109–116. 57. Levy DE, Sidtis JJ Rosenberg DAet al. Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus lock-in patients. Ann Neural. 1987; 22: 673–682. 58. Celesia GG. Persistent vegetative state. Neurology1993; 43: 1457–1458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Loyola University of Chicago, Stricht School of Medicine, 2160 S First Avenue, Maywood, Illinois, 60153, U.S.A

    Gastone G. Celesia

Authors
  1. Gastone G. Celesia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Celesia, G.G. Persistent Vegetative State: Clinical and Ethical Issues. Theor Med Bioeth 18, 221–236 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005709410296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005709410296

Keywords

Search

Navigation