Abstract
We tend to think that the difficulties in bioethics spring from the novel and alarming issues that arise due to discoveries in the new biosciences and biotechnologies. But many of the crucial difficulties in bioethics arise from the assumptions we make about ethics. This paper offers a brief overview of bioethics, and relates ethical ‘principlism’ to ‘ethical fundamentalism’. It then reviews some alternative approaches that have emerged during the second phase of bioethics, and argues for a neo-Aristotelian approach. Misconceptions about ethical principles and ethical reasoning not only distort our views of the business of bioethics, but they also prevent us from facing up to the formidable problems posed by ethical pluralism in so-called liberal societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Devettere RJ. Practical decision-making in healthcare ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 1995.
Jonson A. American moralism and the origins of bioethics in the United States. J Med Philos 1991; 16(1): 113–30.
The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean ethics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin; 1976.
Nussbaum M. The fragility of goodness: luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
O'Neill, O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Toulmin S. The tyranny of principles. Hastings Center Report 1981: 11: 31–39.
Reich W. The search for moral meaning: a new bioethics. In: Kemp P, editor. Bioethics and biolaw. Vol 1. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law, Rhodos Publishers; 2000. p. 41–61.
Charon R. Narrative contributions to medical ethics. In: DuBose E, editor. A matter of principles? Ferment in U.S. bioethics. Washington: Trinity Press; 1994. p. 260–283.
Komesaroff PA. Troubled bodies: critical perspectives on postmodernism, medical ethics, and the body. Durham: Duke University Press; 1995.
Nussbaum M. Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Lovibond S Ethical formation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 2001.
McDowell J. Eudaimonism and moral realism in Aristotle's ethics. In: Heineman R, editor. Aristotle and moral realism. London: UCL Press; 1995. p. 201–218.
Hursthouse R. On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
Kant's Opus postumum. Adickes E, editor. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard; 1920.
Mill JS. On liberty. McCallum R, editor. Oxford: Blackwell; 1946.
Report of the committee on homosexual offences and prostitution (Wolfenden committee). London: HMSO; 1957.
Lyotard JF. The postmodern condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1982.
Sartre JP. Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. Barnes HE, translator. London: Methuen; 1969.
Callahan D. Can the moral commons survive autonomy? Hastings Center Report 1996; 26(6):41–2.
Verspieren P. Apprehension des problèmes de la bioéthique. Après Demain 1984; 266: 37–38.
Glendon MA. A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House; 2001.
Weston B, Falk R, Charlesworth H, editors. Supplement of basic documents in international law and world order. USA; St. Paul; 1997.
The documents of Vatican II. Abbott W, editor. London: Geoffrey Chapman; 1995. p. 672–700.
Charlesworth M. Religious Inventions: The making of a Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charlesworth, M. Don't Blame the ‘Bio’ — Blame the ‘Ethics’: Varieties of (bio) ethics and the challenge of pluralism. J. Bioethical Inquiry 2, 10–17 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02448810
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02448810