Abstract
The world of international relations and law is constantly changing. There is a risk of the systematic undermining of international organisations and law over the next years. Feminist approaches to international law will need to adapt accordingly, to ensure that they continue to challenge inequalities, and serve as an important and critical voice in international law. This article seeks to tell the story of feminist perspectives on international law from the early 1990s till today through a discussion between three generations of feminist international legal scholars: Hilary Charlesworth, who, with her colleagues, contributed to the area in the immediate post-Cold War years, Gina Heathcote, who over the past decade has published extensively on feminist perspectives on the use of force and collective security, and Emily Jones, an early career scholar working on feminist approaches to international law. The conversation, which began as a Skype discussion, considers both the ways in which feminist approaches to international law have changed over the past two decades, as well as the ways in which they have been shaped by global politics, before turning to consider the future for feminist approaches to international law. The impact of feminist approaches to international law has been considerable. However, it seems that feminist approaches still lack legitimacy and credibility in many mainstream circles, remaining on the disciplinary periphery. Charlesworth, Heathcote and Jones discuss potential ways in which to manage some of these tensions, noting both the importance of ‘speaking to ourselves’ (Charlesworth in Feminist perspectives on contemporary International Law: Between resistance and compliance? Hart, Oxford, pp. 17–32, 2011) as a creative and nurturing space, as well as the need to be seen as a more credible voice in the mainstream. They note the need, too, for further feminist work beyond the realms of sexual violence and women’s representation. While the great amount of work in this area is, indeed, foundational, having achieved many important legal and political outcomes, feminist approaches should now develop beyond these areas. Doing so will not only propel this area of scholarship in new and exciting directions, but it might help feminist scholarship gain further traction by avoiding categorisation only under the umbrella of “women’s issues” and thus ready dismissal as just another specialist area of international law in the era of fragmentation.
Notes
S.S. ‘Lotus’ Case (France v Turkey) PCIJ 1927 (Ser. A) No. 10 Sept. 7th.
See: “Wisconsin International Law Journal Annual Symposium, 2014,” accessed July 13, 2017, http://law.wisc.edu/wilj/past/2014.html.
References
Brammertz, Serge and Michelle Jarvis eds. 2016. Prosecuting Conflict-Related Sexual Violence at the ICTY. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charlesworth, Hilary. 1997. Sexing the State. In Sexing the Subject of Law, ed. Nagaire Naffine and Rosemary J. Owens, 251–268. Sydney: The Law Book Co of Australasia.
Charlesworth, Hilary. 2011. Talking to Ourselves? Feminist Scholarship in International Law. In Feminist Perspectives on Contemporary International Law; Between Resistance and Compliance?, ed. Sari Kouvo and Zoe Pearson, 17–32. Oxford: Hart.
Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. 2000. The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Charlesworth, Hilary, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright. 1991. Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law 85(4): 613–645.
Chinkin, Christin, Gina Heathcote, Emily Jones, and Henry Jones. 2017. Bozkurt Case (aka the Lotus Case) France v Turkey: Two Ships that Go Bump in the Night. In Feminist International Judgement Project, ed. Loveday Hodson and Troy Lavers. Oxford: Hart.
Engle, Karen. 2005. Feminism and its Discontents: Criminalizing Wartime Rape in Bosnia and Herzegovina. American Journal of International Law 99: 778–816.
Halley, Janet. 2006. Split Decisions: Why and How to Take a Break from Feminism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heathcote, Gina, 2016. Fragmented Feminisms: Critical Feminist Thinking in the Post-Millennium Era. In International Law and…Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Vol. 5, 2014, ed. August Reinich et al. 309–322. Oxford: Hart.
Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why Stories Matter: the Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jones, Charlie. L. 2017. SOAS Management Give into Fractional Teaching Staff Pay Demands. London Student 8th May 2017. Accessed June 2017. http://londonstudent.coop/banner/2017/05/08/soas-fractional-fairpay-agreed.
Kapur, Ratna. 2005. Erotic Justice: Law and the New Politics of Postcolonialism. London: Glass House Press.
Kennedy, David. 2004. The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2005. From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kouvo, Sari, and Zoe Pearson eds. 2011. Feminist Perspectives on Contemporary International Law; Between Resistance and Compliance?. Oxford: Hart.
MacKinnon, Catharine. 2005. Are Women Human?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mohanty, Chandra. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nesiah, Vaskui. 2011. Priorities of Feminist Legal Research: a sketch, a draft agenda, a hint of an outline…’. feminists@law 1(1) online journal. http://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/issue/view/3.
Olsen, Frances E. 1983. The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform. Harvard Law Review 96(7): 1497–1578.
S.S. ‘Lotus’ Case (France v Turkey) PCIJ. 1927. (Ser. A) No. 10, September 7th.
Tesón, Fernando R. 1993. Feminism and International Law: A Reply. Virginia Journal of International Law 33: 647–684.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conversation edited by Emily Jones, Sari Kouvo and Elin Sandegård.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charlesworth, H., Heathcote, G. & Jones, E. Feminist Scholarship on International Law in the 1990s and Today: An Inter-Generational Conversation. Fem Leg Stud 27, 79–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9384-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9384-1