Skip to main content
Log in

Pain and Folk Theory

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

Pain is not a primitive sensory event but rather a complexperception and a process by which a person interacts with theinternal and external environments, constructs meaning, andengages in action. Because folk beliefs are central to meaning,folk concepts of pain play multiple causal roles in a painpatient's interaction with health care providers and others.In every case, the notion of pain is linked to a goal-directedbehavior that is useful to the person. The wide variation inconcepts of pain across individuals suffering with painunderscores the richness and complexity of the pain experience.In some cases involving chronic pain, the patient may form amaladaptive cluster of behaviors around the concept of pain.Patient beliefs and expectations are an important part of manychronic pain syndromes, and patients can benefit fromintervention directed at revising the individual's folk model of pain. Memetics offers a framework for identifying the memesthat patients hold and determining whether patient memes fitor clash with provider memes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, S. and Eccleston, C., in press: Making sense of everyday pain, Social Science and Medicine.

  • Andersson, G. B., 1999: Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain, Lancet 354(9178), 581–585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L., 1962: How to Do Things with Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S., 1999: The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R., 1996: Virus of the Mind: the New Science of the Meme, Integral Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. B. and Cousins, M. J., 1997: Trends in pain management 1987–1996: An evidence-based survey, Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 10, xliii-xlvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. R. and Gavrin, J., 1999: Suffering: The contributions of persistent pain, Lancet 9171), 2233–2237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. R. and Nakamura, Y., 1999: Pain and consciousness: A constructivist approach, Pain Forum 8(3), 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., 1976: The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C., 1991: Two contrasts: Folk craft versus folk science, and belief versus opinion, in D. C. Dennett (ed.) (1998), Brainchildren, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. M., Smith, B. H., Penny, K. I., Smith, W. C., and Chambers, W. A., 1999: The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community, Lancet 354(9186), 1248–1252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, L., Mariano, A. J., Chabal, C. and Chaney, E. F., 1997: Beyond the needle: Expanding the role of anesthesiologists in the management of chronic non-malignant pain, Anesthesiology 87(5), 1210–1218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F. and Knobe, J., 1997: The folk concept of intentionality, J. Exper. Social Psychol. 33, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, E., 1990: Memetic science: I. General introduction, J. Ideas 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, E., 1995: Metasystems, memes and cybernetic immortality, in F. Heylighen, C. Joslyn and V. Turchin (eds), The Quantum of Evolution: Toward a Theory of Metasystem Transitions, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, H., 1993: Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., 1978–1979: Philosophy as a kind of writing: An essay on Derrida, New Literary History X, 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., 1979: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., 1982: Consequences of Pragmatism, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 90–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R., 1969: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M., 1999: Between first-person and third-person accounts of pain in clinical medicine, in M. Max (ed.), Pain 1999-An Updated Review, IASP Press, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L., 1958: Philosophical Investigations (Tr. GEM Anscombe), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, C.R., Nakamura, Y. & Chapman, C.N. Pain and Folk Theory. Brain and Mind 1, 209–222 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010079214372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010079214372

Navigation