Abstract
This article examines (on the basis of Russian history) the development of the concept of a “special path” in societies that have experienced problems with their self-identity. Western European intellectuals who needed an “other” in the construction and definition of their own cultural and geographical space in the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries played an important role in shaping the understanding of a Russian “special path.” The “Russian chaos” they postulated was contrasted to “Western” rationalism and order and Eastern “slavery” was seen as a counter position to the “Western” demands regarding human dignity. With the coming of an era of nationalism in Russia, many of these ideas were adopted by Russian intellectuals and laid a foundation for their own work toward the formation of a national identity. Orthodoxy (as opposed to Catholicism and Protestantism), autocracy (as opposed to parliamentarianism), Narodnost’ (“national spirit”) and communal traditionalism (in contrast to capitalism, private property and individualism) were seen as the only alternatives to the modern West. The Russian “Westernizers” were captivated by the idea of a “special path” as much as the “Slavophiles” and saw this path through the prism of uniquely refracted concepts of “Orthodoxy, autocracy and Narodnost’”. The author considers the concept of the ‘special path’ not only as a means of forming group identity, but also as a type of social search within the boundaries of the dominant paradigm. Russian intellectuals claiming Russian ‘uniqueness’ today, as two centuries ago, are doing so, to a very considerable degree, as a result of western intellectualism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreev, A. (2003). Obraz Evropy v sovremennom rossijskom obščestve. Mirovaja ekonomika i meždunarodnye otnošenija, 5, 35–43.
Čaadaev, P. Ja. (1990). Polnoe sobranie sočinenij (Vol. 2). Moscow: Nauka.
Čistozvonov, A. N. (1971). K diskussii ob absoljutizme v Rossii. Istorija SSSR, 3, 72–76.
Fedosov, I. A. (1970). Prosveščennyj absoljutizm v Rossii. Voprosy istorii, 9, 34–55.
Filjuškin, A. (2004). Kak Rossija stala dlja Evropy Aziej. Ab imperio, 1, 191–227.
Gercen, A. I. (1954). Sobranie sočinenij v 30 tomah (Vol. 2). Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR.
Gercen, A. I. (1955a). Sobranie sočinenij v 30 tomah (Vol. 5). Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR.
Gercen, A. I. (1955b). Sobranie sočinenij v 30 tomah (Vol. 6). Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR.
Gercen, A. I. (1957). Sobranie sočinenij v 30 tomah (Vol. 12). Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR.
Gradovskij, A. (1881). Slavjanofil’skaja teorija gosudarstvennosti. Golos, 159, 1.
Grosul, V. Ja. (2003). Russkoe obščhestvo XVIII-XIX vekov: Tradicii i novacii. Moscow: Nauka.
Henshall, N. (2003). Mif absoljutizma: Peremeny i preemstvennost’ v razvitii zapadnoevropejskoj monarkhii rannego Novogo vremeni. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteja.
Hobsbawm, E. (1999). The age of revolution (1789–1845). New York: Vintage.
Ivonin, I., & Yu, E. (2003). Fridrich 2 Gogencollern i Iosif 2 Gabsburg. Voprosy istorii, 10, 49–73.
Kappeler, A. (2000). Rossija—mnogonacional’naja imperija. Vozniknovenie. Istorija. Raspad. Moscow: ProgressTradicija.
Kavelin, K. D. (1989). Naš umstvennyj stroj. Moscow: Pravda.
Kohn, H. (1967). The idea of nationalism. New York: Collier.
Levkievskaja, E. (2000). Russkaja ideja v kontekste istoričeskikh mifologičeskikh modelej. In K. Eimermacher, F. Bomsdorf, & G. Bordyugov (Eds.), Mify i mifologija v sovremennoj Rossii (pp. 67–91). Moscow: AIRO-XX.
Lur’e, S. V. (1999). Nacionalizm, etničnost’, kul’tura. Kategorii nauki i istoričeskaja praktika. Obščestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 4, 101–111.
Miller, A. (1992). Nacionalizm kak factor razvitija. Obščestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 1, 124–132.
Mironov, B. N. (1999). Social’naja istorija Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII- načalo XX vekov) (Vol. 2). Sankt-Peterburg: Dmitrij Bulanin.
Pavlova-Sil’vanskaja, M. P. (1969). K voprosu ob osobennostjakh absoljutizma v Rossii. Istorija SSSR, 6, 217–234.
Pipes, R. (2001). Osobyj put’ dlja Rossii: čto konkretno eto značit? Vestnik Evropy, 1.
Pustarnakov, V. F. (2001). Filosofija Prosveščenija v Rossii i vo Francii: opyt sravnitel’nogo analiza. Moscow: Institut Filosofii RAN.
Ragsdale, H. (2001). Prosveščennyj absoljutizm i vnešnjaja politika Rossii v 1762–1815 godakh. Otečestvennaja istorija, 3, 3–24.
Šapiro, A. L. (1968). Ob absoljutizme v Rossii. Istorija SSSR, 5, 69–82.
Štikhve, R. (1998). Ambivalentnost’, indifferentnost’ i sociologija čužogo. Žurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii, 1, 41–53.
Titov, P. Yu. (1973). Absoljutizm v Rossii. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1, 107–112.
Wittram, R. (1973). Russia and Europe. London: Thames A. Hudson.
Wolff, L. (2003). Izobretaja Vostočnuju Evropu: Karta civilizacii v soznanii epokhi Prosveščenija. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Wortman, R. (2004). Scenarii vlasti. Mify i ceremonii russkoj monarkhii (Vol. 2). Moscow: O.G.I.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from the Russian by Katherine Bowers; Edited by John-Thomas Eltringham.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cherepanova, R. Discourse on a Russian “Sonderweg”: European models in Russian disguise. Stud East Eur Thought 62, 315–329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9118-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9118-7