Skip to main content
Log in

Hartshorne's argument for God's all-inclusiveness

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Charles Hartshorne and William L. Reese,Philosophers Speak of God, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), p. 19. Underlining is by Hartshorne.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles Hartshorne,A Natural Theology for Our Time, (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1973), pp. 176–177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.,, pp. 190–191.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Francis H. Parker, “Head, Heart, and God”, (Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 14, 1960-61), p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid.,, p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Hartshorne, “Absolute Objects and Relative Subjects”, (The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 15, 1961), p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charles Hartshorne,Man's Vision of God and the Logic of Theism, (Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1964), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid.,, p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.,, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.,, pp. 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Charles Hartshorne,A Natural Theology for Our Time, pp. 97–98.

  12. Ibid., Charles Hartshorne,A Natural Theology for Our Time, p. 98.

  13. I have here avoided going to a discussion of the religious viability of Hartshorne's notion of the cosmic organism, as it would be going beyond my intention in this paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chew, H.H. Hartshorne's argument for God's all-inclusiveness. SOPH 27, 2–10 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781306

Keywords

Navigation