Skip to main content
Log in

Linking Temporal Landmarks to Voluntary Simplicity: The Mediating Roles of Self-Transcendence and Self-Enhancement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Voluntary simplicity (VS) refers to a minimalistic lifestyle of conscious, ecological, and ethical consumption, which is conducive to individual, societal, and environmental well-being. For policymakers and business managers, a key to leveraging this consumer shift is to promote persuasive appeals effectively. This research theorizes that the two forms of VS appeals are systematically associated with distinct temporal landmarks. In particular, we demonstrate that consumers are more likely to engage in biospheric voluntary simplicity (BVS) when priming a temporal landmark as the start of a time period. In contrast, consumers are more likely to participate in egoistic voluntary simplicity (EVS) when priming a temporal landmark as the end of a time period. Notably, the matching effects are driven by distinct mechanisms, such that the effect of a match between a start temporal landmark and BVS appeals is driven by self-transcendence, whereas the effect of a match between an end temporal landmark and EVS appeals is motivated by self-enhancement. Beyond their substantive theoretical significance, our findings provide marketing campaigns with tools to enact strategies that support voluntary simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Alexander, S., & Ussher, S. (2012). The voluntary simplicity movement: A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, S., Perkins, A., & Sprott, D. (2021). The effect of start/end temporal landmarks on consumers’ visual attention and judgments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boujbel, L., & d’Astous, A. (2012). Voluntary simplicity and life satisfaction: Exploring the mediating role of consumption desires. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(6), 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bove, L. L., Nagpal, A., & Dorsett, A. D. S. (2009). Exploring the determinants of the frugal shopper. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ran, Y. (2023). A silver lining of the epidemic: How contagious disease salience leads to minimalistic consumption. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03646-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Wei, H. (2022). Minimalism in capsule hotels: Enhancing tourist responses by using minimalistic lifestyle appeals congruent with brand personality. Tourism Management, 93, 104579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Wei, H., Meng, L., & Ran, Y. (2019). Believing in karma: The effect of mortality salience on excessive consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Wei, H., Xiong, J., & Ran, Y. (2021). Less is more: A theoretical interpretation of minimalism in consumption. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(11), 2043–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. M. (2018). Religiosity and voluntary simplicity: The mediating role of spiritual well-being. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, A. N., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Environmentally active people: The role of autonomy, relatedness, competence and self-determined motivation. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 631–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig‐Lees, M., & Hill, C. (2002). Understanding voluntary simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., Milkman, K. L., & Riis, J. (2014). The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Science, 60(10), 2563–2582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., Milkman, K. L., & Riis, J. (2015). Put your imperfections behind you: Temporal landmarks spur goal initiation when they signal new beginnings. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1927–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. (2016). Who buys overpackaged grocery products and why? Understanding consumers’ reactions to overpackaging in the food sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 683–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, D., & Mitchell, A. (1977). Voluntary Simplicity. The Co-Evolution Quarterly, 3, 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1998). Voluntary simplicity: Characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 619–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, A. D., & Kenny, M. E. (2021). Connectedness to nature, personality traits and empathy from a sustainability perspective. Current Psychology, 40(3), 1095–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., Cherry, M., & Watkins, M. (2019). Moral, wasteful, frugal, or thrifty? Identifying consumer identities to understand and manage pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(1), 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., & Tse, C. S. (2018). Abstractness and desirableness in the human values system: Self-transcendence values are construed more abstractly, but felt more closely than are self-enhancement values. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2016). Coping and construal level matching drives health message effectiveness via response efficacy or self-efficacy enhancement. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(3), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennecke, M., & Converse, B. A. (2017). Next week next month next year: How perceived temporal boundaries affect initiation expectations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 918–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herziger, A., Berkessel, J. B., & Steinnes, K. K. (2020). Wean off green: On the (in) effectiveness of biospheric appeals for consumption curtailment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., Mai, R., & Peyer, M. (2018). Under which conditions are consumers ready to boycott or buycott? The roles of hedonism and simplicity. Ecological Economics, 147, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüttel, A., Balderjahn, I., & Hoffmann, S. (2020). Welfare beyond consumption: The benefits of having less. Ecological Economics, 176, 106719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., Martinez, C. M. J., & Johnson, C. (2021). Minimalism as a sustainable lifestyle: Its behavioral representations and contributions to emotional well-being. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 802–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2017). Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, B., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 350–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25(1), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarczyk, J., & Oliver, M. A. (2022). Accumulative vs. appreciative expressions of materialism: Revising materialism in light of polish simplifiers and new materialism. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(4), 701–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropfeld, M. I., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Dantas, D. C. (2018). The ecological impact of anti-consumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuanr, A., Pradhan, D., & Chaudhuri, H. R. (2020). I (do not) consume; therefore, I am: Investigating materialism and voluntary simplicity through a moderated mediation model. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 260–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulow, K., & Kramer, T. (2016). In pursuit of good karma: When charitable appeals to do right go wrong. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2014). I’m moral, but I won’t help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K., & Pennington, W. (2020). Towards a theory of minimalism and wellbeing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 5(2), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, S., & Zschau, T. (2019). In search of the “Good Life”: The appeal of the tiny house lifestyle in the USA. Social Sciences, 8(1), 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGouran, C., & Prothero, A. (2016). Enacted voluntary simplicity–Exploring the consequences of requesting consumers to intentionally consume less. European Journal of Marketing, 50(2), 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2017). When materialists intend to resist consumption: The moderating role of self-control and long-term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(3), 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangarkar, A., Shukla, P., & Charles, R. (2021). Minimalism in consumption: A typology and brand engagement strategies. Journal of Business Research, 127, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peetz, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2013). The post-birthday world: Consequences of temporal landmarks for temporal self-appraisal and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peetz, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2014). Marking time: Selective use of temporal landmarks as barriers between current and future selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(1), 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelikán, V., Galčanová, L., & Kala, L. (2020). Ecological habitus intergenerationally reproduced: The children of Czech ‘voluntary simplifiers’ and their lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(4), 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., & Klemm, A. (2017). The role of sustainability in profiling voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Business Research, 70, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, L. L., Coulter, R. A., Strizhakova, Y., & Schultz, A. E. (2018). The fresh start mindset: Transforming consumers’ lives. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, S. A., Wright, B. J., & Bennett, P. C. (2020). Development of the Voluntary Simplicity Engagement Scale: Measuring low-consumption lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43, 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roccas, S. (2003). Identification and status revisited: The moderating role of self-enhancement and self-transcendence values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 726–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. R., Meloy, M. G., & Bolton, L. E. (2021). Disorder and downsizing. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 959–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., & Dirilen-Gumus, O. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shum, M. S. (1998). The role of temporal landmarks in autobiographical memory processes. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. V., & Bellezza, S. (2022). Consumer minimalism. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 796–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. E., Thomas, J. B., Moore, M., & Carroll, K. (2013). Voluntary simplicity: The great American apparel diet. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavestoski, S. (2002). The social-psychological bases of anti-consumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M., Bagchi, R., & Hock, S. J. (2019). The mere deadline effect: Why more time might sabotage goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 1068–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (72302103), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M731310), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (23JNQN48).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiying Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Appendix A

See Figs. 3 and 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Materials of the BVS appeal used in Study 2

Fig. 4
figure 4

Materials of the EVS appeal used in Study 2

Appendix B

See Figs. 5 and 6.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Materials of the start temporal landmark used in Study 2

Fig. 6
figure 6

Materials of the end temporal landmark used in Study 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Wei, H. Linking Temporal Landmarks to Voluntary Simplicity: The Mediating Roles of Self-Transcendence and Self-Enhancement. J Bus Ethics 188, 693–708 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05504-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05504-y

Keywords

Navigation