Abstract
Sustainable development presents many challenges and tensions, which requires acceptance and continuous efforts to manage by organisations in a wider sustainability journey. The problem is, most global firms find it difficult to rationalise the nature of these tensions, their dynamic relationships in sustainability, and how to systematically address their complex relationships simultaneously. In this regard, these firms are faced with a great deal of ambiguity and difficulties in understanding these tensions, their implications, and the managerial strategies in responding to them.
This begs the questions of the nature of tensions in sustainability and management strategies in holding these tensions into a dynamic equilibrium. To explore these questions, this chapter examines potential tensions which may exist in addressing divergent sustainability aspects in the context of Chinese and New Zealand business partnerships. In order to address these tensions dynamically, this chapter has established a conceptual theoretical model through an interplay among Smith and Lewis, Hahn, Pinkse and Preuss as well as Li Peter Ping’s models. This will enrich the existing literature of tensions inherent in sustainability. In addition, this conceptual model will not only contribute to Chinese and New Zealand firms in business partnerships to better manage tensions, but also for global firms who are dedicated to achieving holistic sustainability. We also consider the conceptual integrity and practical prospects for tensions in future sustainability research to be explored in more specific contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angus-Leppan, T., Benn, S., & Young, L. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.675.
Baker, T. (1994). Doing social research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bansal, P. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.7173572.
Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1983.4284737.
Beech, N., Burns, H., Caestecker, L. D., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10), 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704048357.
Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2007). Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: Developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 49(4), 132–157.
Bonacchi, M., & Rinaldi, L. (2007). DartBoards and clovers as new tools in sustainability planning and control. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(7), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.596.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Designing and changing organizational culture based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Chen, M.-J. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘middle way’ perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016235517735.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271994.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Department of Natural Resources Canada. (2012). Oil sands: A strategic resource for Canada, North America and the global market. Ottawa, ON: Brochure. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/energy/pdf/eneene/pubpub/pdf/OS-brochure-eng.pdf
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the suitable corporation: Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
Eweje, G. (2006). Strategic partnerships between MNEs and civil society: The post-WSSD perspectives. Sustainable Development, 15, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.295.
Fang, T. (2011). Yin yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756–785. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1994.9412190218.
Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1245-2.
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035.
Hahn, T. (2012). Reciprocal stakeholder behavior: A motive-based approach to the implementation of normative stakeholder demands. Business & Society, 54(1), 9–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312439029.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.674.
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341.
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.
Hayford, C. W. (2009). Westernization. In D. Pong (Ed.), Encyclopedia of modern China (pp. 893–918). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Heijenoort, J. V. (1967). Logical paradoxes. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 45–51). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Held, M. (2001). Sustainable development from a temporal perspective. Time & Society, 10(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X01010002011.
Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614535786.
Keith, D. W. (2000). Dangerous abundance In). In T. Homer-Dixon & N. Garrison (Eds.), Carbon shift: How the twin crises of oil depletion and climate change will define the future (pp. 27–57). Toronto: Random House.
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712.
Li, P. P. (2008). Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00120.x.
Li, P. P. (2012). Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9250-z.
Li, P. P. (2016). Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(1), 42–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-10-2015-0137.
Liu, S.-H. (1974). The use of analogy and symbolism in traditional Chinese philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 1(3), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.1974.tb00654.x.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990). Demystifying mentalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, P. H. (1985). Methods of social investigation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2008). Thinking of the organization as a system: The role of managerial perceptions in developing a corporate social responsibility strategic agenda. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(3), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.900.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ministry of Business Innovation and Empolyment. (2016). New Zealand companies. Retrieved from https://www.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/learn-about/updating-company-details/financial-reporting/new-zealand-companies
New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade. (2012). Opening doors to China. Retrieved from www.mfat.govt.nz
New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade. (2014). NZ-China free trade agreement. Retrieved from https://mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/china-fta
New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. (2015). An overview of the New Zealand emissions trading scheme. Retrieved from http://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions
New Zealand Trade & Enterprise. (2014). New Zealand companies partner with China. Retrieved from https://www.nzte.govt.nz/en/news-and-media/new-zealand-companies-partner-with-china/
Okereke, C. (2006). Global environmental sustainability: Intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum, 37(5), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.10.005.
O’Sullivan, F. (2017, March 28). Leaders’ rapport a positive from Li visit. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11827258
Oumlil, A. B. (2015). Global business partnerships and sourcing strategies. In J.-C. Chebat & A. B. Oumlil (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 multicultural marketing conference (pp. 479–479). Cham: Springer.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Peirce, C. S. (1974). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741.
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308389.
Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399.
Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success and how you can too. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422.
Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business & Society, 47(7), 148–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306297942.
Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1537–1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612463319.
Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0960.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134.
Statistics New Zealand. (2016). Trade with China nearly tripled in past decade. Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/imports_and_exports/trade-china-tripled-decade.aspx
Thomas, G. (2016). How to do your case study (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2016). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575047.
Wan, Z., & Craig, B. (2013). Reflections on China-US energy cooperation: Overcoming differences to advance collaboration. Utilities Policy, 27, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.09.007.
WCED. (1987). Our common future. In Paper presented at the world commission on environment and development, Oxford.
Wilson, M. (2003). Corporate sustainability: What is it and where does it come from? Ivey Business Journal, 4(5), 1–5.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., Liu, C., & Pawar, K. S. (2017). Short-term versus long-term benefits: Balanced sustainability framework and research propositions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 11(7), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.09.003.
Xu, E., Yang, H., Quan, J. M., & Lu, Y. (2015). Organizational slack and corporate social performance: Empirical evidence from China’s public firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9401-0.
Ye, B., Jiang, J., Miao, L., Li, J., & Peng, Y. (2016). Innovative carbon allowance allocation policy for the Shenzhen emission trading scheme in China. Sustainability, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010003.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2010). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, M.S., Eweje, G., Kennedy, J.C. (2019). Managing Tensions in Sustainability in Chinese and New Zealand Business Partnerships: A Conceptual Perspective. In: Capaldi, N., Idowu, S.O., Schmidpeter, R., Brueckner, M. (eds) Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11217-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11217-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11216-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11217-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)