Skip to main content
Log in

Bildung as Cultural Participation: The Prereflective and Reflective Self in Hegel’s Phenomenology

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary poststructural and hermeneutical theories emphasize the prereflective opacity of the self and the consequent inarticulateness concerning the deep prereflective layers (‘prejudices’) of self-understanding. Some of such ontologically significant prejudices, some hermeneutical views hold, are inescapable and so the self cannot reflectively refuse or overcome them. This paper proposes the Hegelian notion of self-consciousness in the Phenomenology as the restless, unreflective–reflective negation of its own nothingness or contingent, open givenness as an alternative that both accepts the hermeneutical insight concerning the deep prereflective layers of self-understanding and rejects the inescapability of ontologically significant ‘prejudices’. Hegelian self-consciousness is minimally reflective, even though it is intertwined with its prereflective, ritualistic basis and its historical situatedness. The paper depicts the reflective dimension of the prereflectively grounded Hegelian self by explicating the meaning of the Phenomenology’s conception of Bildung as ‘cultural participation’. The self that is continuously remade through its dialectical relation (cultural participation) to the social substance or Spirit is minimally reflective in the sense that it sees itself reflected or externalized in the world of its engagement, and because it inserts its own conception upon the world by participating in it. This reconceptualization of the dialectic between self and social substance, thus, escapes overemphasizing the prereflective layers of the self’s hermeneutical background without falling back on the Cartesian deworlded self of reflection and thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Hegelian conception of self-other relation, emerging from the master–servant dialectic, is the basis of the recognition theory of Charles Taylor (1992/1994) and Axel Honneth (1992/1995). Emmanuel Levinas (1961/1991), on the other hand, critiques self-other relation in Hegel as assimilative and totalizing. In this paper, I will overlook the question of self-other relation in Hegel’s Phenomenology and focus on the relation of self-consciousness with the whole social substance in its prereflective and reflective dimensions.

References

  • Butler, J. (1987). Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth- century France. Columbia University Press.

  • Butler, J. (2000). “Restaging the Universal: Hegemony and the Limits of Formalism.” In Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Žižek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.

  • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press.

  • Bykova, M. (2020). Hegel's Philosophy of Bildung in Ed. Bykova, M., & Westphal, K. The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Foucault, M. (2005). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1966)

  • Gadamer, H-G. (1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer, & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960)

  • George, S. K. (2020). Prejudice and the pedagogue: Teaching in a democratic classroom. In J. Russon, S. K. George, & P. G. Jung (Eds.), Teaching in unequal societies (pp. 297–323). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1994). Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 107–148). Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel. G. W. F. (1975). Lectures on the philosophy of world history: Introduction: Reason in history (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge University. (Original lecture given 1822–30)

  • Hegel. G. W. F. (2010). The science of logic (G. Giovanni, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1812)

  • Hegel. G. W. F. (2018). The phenomenology of spirit (T. Pinkard, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1807)

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)

  • Heidegger, M. (1988). The basic problems of phenomenology (A. Hofstadter, Trans.) (rev. ed.). Indiana University Press. (Original lecture given 1927)

  • Heidegger, M. (2002). Hegel’s concept of experience. In J. Young, & K. Haynes (Ed. & Trans.), Off the beaten path (pp. 86–156). Cambridge University Press. (Original work composed 1942–43)

  • Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Polity. (Original work published 1992)

  • Houlgate, S. (2013). Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Reader’s Guide. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? (M J. Gregor, Trans.). In The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy (pp. 11–22). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1784)

  • Kojève, A. (1969). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit (A. Bloom, Ed., & J. H. Nichols Jr., Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original lecture given 1933–39)

  • Levinas, E. (1991). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Kluwer. (Original work published 1961)

  • Lumsden, S. (2014). Self-consciousness and the critique of the subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the poststructuralists. Columbia University.

  • Markus, G. (2011). Culture, science, society: The constitution of cultural modernity. Brill.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945)

  • Mills, J. (2002). The unconscious abyss: Hegel’s anticipation of psychoanalysis. SUNY Press.

  • Nancy, J-L. (2002). Hegel: The restlessness of the negative (J. Smith & S. Miller, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1997)

  • Novakovic, A. (2017). Hegel on second nature in ethical life. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odenstedt, A. (2017). Gadamer on tradition: Historical context and the limits of reflection. Springer.

  • Patrick, M. (2000). Liberalism, rights and recognition. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(5), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370002600502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, T. (1996). Hegel's Phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge University Press.

  • Pinkard, T. (2018). Forword, The Phenomenology of Spirit (1807). Translated by Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pippin, R. B. (1993). You can’t get there from here: Transition problems in Hegel’s Phenomenology of spirit. In F. C. Beiser (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hegel (pp. 52–85). Cambridge University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russon, J. (2016). Infinite phenomenology: The lessons of Hegel’s science of experience. Northwestern University Press.

  • Russon, J. (1995). Heidegger, Hegel and ethnicity: The ritual basis of self-identity. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, XXXII, I(4), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00758.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russon, J. (1997). The self and its body in Hegel’s Phenomenology of spirit. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabot, P. (2012). Foreword: Finished with Hegel? (D. Young, Trans.). In J. Butler, Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth- century France (pp. vii-xi). Columbia University Press.

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.

  • Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Guttmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1992)

  • Taylor, C. (1979). Hegel and modern society. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nisar Alungal Chungath.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chungath, N.A. Bildung as Cultural Participation: The Prereflective and Reflective Self in Hegel’s Phenomenology. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 41, 117–138 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-023-00321-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-023-00321-0

Keywords

Navigation