Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern U.S. Ag advisors’ views on drought, climate change, and risk management

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through the lens of the Health Belief Model and Protection Motivation Theory, we analyzed interviews of 36 agricultural advisors in Indiana and Nebraska to understand their appraisals of climate change risk, related decision making processes and subsequent risk management advice to producers. Most advisors interviewed accept that weather events are a risk for US Midwestern agriculture; however, they are more concerned about tangible threats such as crop prices. There is not much concern about climate change among agricultural advisors. Management practices that could help producers adapt to climate change were more likely to be recommended by conservation and Extension advisors, while financial and crop advisors focused more upon season-to-season decision making (e.g., hybrid seeds and crop insurance). We contend that the agricultural community should integrate long-term thinking as part of farm decision making processes and that agricultural advisors are in a prime position to influence producers. In the face of increasing extreme weather events, climatologists and advisors should work more closely to reach a shared understanding of the risks posed to agriculture by climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GDP:

Gross domestic product

HBM:

Health belief model

PMT:

Protection motivation theory

US:

United States

References

  • Arbuckle, J. G. Jr, L. S. Prokopy, T. Haigh, J. Hobbs, T. Knoot, C. Knutson, A. Loy, A. S. Mase, J. McGuire, L. W. Morton, and J. Tyndall. 2013. Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States. Climatic Change 117 (4): 943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. G. Jr, L. W. Morton, and J. Hobbs. 2015. Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation: The roles of trust in sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, and perceived risk. Environment and Behavior 47 (2): 205–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. P., and L. Toma. 2012. A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Climatic Change 112 (2): 507–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R., and G. W. Ryan. 2009. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Bowen, G. A. 2008. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research 8 (1): 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, N. E., C. W. Fraisse, and V. E. Cabrera. 2010. The cooperative extension service as a boundary organization for diffusion of climate forecasts: a 5-year study. Journal of Extension 48 (4): 4RIB7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buizer, J., K. Jacobs, and D. Cash. 2010. Making short-term climate forecasts useful: Linking science and action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (17): 4597–4602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R. E., A. J. Vuola, M. A. Megalos, D. C. Adams, and M. C. Monroe. 2014. North Carolina cooperative extension professionals’ climate change perceptions, willingness, and perceived barriers to programming: An educational needs assessment. Journal of Extension 52 (1): n1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research 42 (3): 294–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, L. 2016. Factors influencing farmer adoption of soil health practices in the United States: A narrative review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40 (6): 583–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, J. S., J. R. Angel, S. Fei, M. Huber, T. M. Koontz, B. J. MacGowan, N. D. Mullendore, N. Babin, and L. S. Prokopy. 2014. State service foresters’ attitudes toward using climate and weather information when advising forest landowners. Journal of Forestry 112 (1): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, J. S., A. S. Mase, C. L. Knutson, M. C. Lemos, T. Haigh, D. P. Todey, and L. S. Prokopy. 2016. The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes. Climatic Change 135 (2): 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, S. P., and L. S. Prokopy. 2017. The influence of social criteria in mobilizing watershed conservation efforts: A case study of a successful watershed in the Midwestern US. Land Use Policy 61: 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, S. P., T. Haigh, M. Widhalm, S. G. de Jalon, N. Babin, J. S. Carlton, M. Dunn, K. Fagan, C. L. Knutson, and L. S. Prokopy. 2017. Agricultural trade publications and the 2012 Midwestern US drought: A missed opportunity for climate risk communication. Climate Risk Management 15: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cismaru, M., R. Cismaru, T. Ono, and K. Nelson. 2011. Act on climate change”: An application of protection motivation theory. Social Marketing Quarterly 17 (3): 62–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychosocial Measurement 20: 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T. A., C. Roncoli, J. Paz, N. Breuer, K. Broad, K. T. Ingram, and G. Hoogenboom. 2010. Forecast skill and farmers’ skills: Seasonal climate forecasts and agricultural risk management in the southeastern United States. Weather, Climate, and Society 2 (1): 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., A. Dan, and R. Shwom. 2007. Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology 72 (2): 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., A. Bostrom, I. Burton, D. M. Johnston, J. McClure, D. Paton, J. Van Der Pligt, and M. P. White. 2012. Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 1: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. 1995. On the reliability of sequential data: Measurement, meaning, and correction. The analysis of change. 339–359. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. 2009. An invitation to social construction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorden, R. 1992. Basic interviewing skills. Itasca: F. E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramig, B. M., J. M. Barnard, and L. S. Prokopy. 2013. Farmer beliefs about climate change and carbon sequestration incentives. Climate Research 56 (2): 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann, T., and A. Patt. 2005. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change 15 (3): 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann, T., and F. Reusswig. 2006. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards 38 (1–2): 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haden, V. R., M. T. Niles, M. Lubell, J. Perlman, and L. E. Jackson. 2012. Global and local concerns: What attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PloS ONE 7 (12): e52882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, T., L. W. Morton, M. C. Lemos, C. Knutson, L. S. Prokopy, Y. J. Lo, and J. Angel. 2015. Agricultural advisors as climate Information intermediaries: Exploring differences in capacity to communicate climate. Weather, Climate, and Society 7 (1): 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, J. L., K. J. Boote, B. A. Kimball, L. H. Ziska, R. C. Izaurralde, D. Ort, A. M. Thomson, and D. Wolfe. 2011. Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agronomy Journal 103 (2): 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, J. E., and N. M. Ardoin. 2008. Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research 14 (3): 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howden, S. M., J. F. Soussana, F. N. Tubiello, N. Chhetri, M. Dunlop, and H. Meinke. 2007. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (50): 19691–19696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, J. 2014. Risk perception: Theories, strategies, and next steps. Campbell Institute.

  • Jagtap, S. S., J. W. Jones, P. Hildebrand, D. Letson, J. J. O’Brien, G. Podestá, D. Zierden, and F. Zazueta. 2002. Responding to stakeholder’s demands for climate information: from research to applications in Florida. Agricultural Systems 74 (3): 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, N. K., and M. H. Becker. 1984. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education and Behavior 11 (1): 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M. C., C. J. Kirchhoff, and V. Ramprasad. 2012. Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change 2 (11): 789–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M. C., Y. J. Lo, C. Kirchhoff, and T. Haigh. 2014. Crop advisors as climate information brokers: Building the capacity of US farmers to adapt to climate change. Climate Risk Management 4: 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase, A. S., and L. S. Prokopy. 2014. Unrealized potential: A review of perceptions and use of weather and climate information in agricultural decision making. Weather, Climate, and Society 6 (1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase, A. S., H. Cho, and L. S. Prokopy. 2015. Enhancing the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) by exploring trust, the availability heuristic, and agricultural advisors’ belief in climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 41: 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase, A. S., B. M. Gramig, and L. S. Prokopy. 2017. Climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation behavior among Midwestern US crop farmers. Climate Risk Management 15: 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBean, G. 2004. Climate change and extreme weather: A basis for action. Natural Hazards 31 (1): 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

  • Moser, S. C. 2010. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (1): 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 2010. Adapting to the impacts of climate change: America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M. C. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter to public engagement. Environment 51: 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., and B. Fischhoff. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change 1 (1): 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, C., B. Doppelt, M. Herr, and Climate Leadership Initiative. 2010. Climate communications and behavior change: A guide for practitioners. The Resource Innovation Group and The Climate Leadership Initiative Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon.

  • Prokopy, L. S., K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, and A. Baumgart-Getz. 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63 (5): 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L. S., T. Haigh, A. S. Mase, J. Angel, C. Hart, C. Knutson, M. C. Lemos, Y. J. Lo, J. McGuire, L. W. Morton, and J. Perron. 2013. Agricultural advisors: A receptive audience for weather and climate information? Weather, Climate, and Society 5 (2): 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L. S., J. S. Carlton, J. G. Arbuckle Jr, T. Haigh, M. C. Lemos, A. S. Mase, N. Babin, M. Dunn, J. Andresen, J. Angel, and C. Hart. 2015a. Extension′ s role in disseminating information about climate change to agricultural stakeholders in the United States. Climatic Change 130 (2): 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L. S., L. W. Morton, J. G. Arbuckle Jr., A. S. Mase, and A. K. Wilke. 2015b. Agricultural stakeholder views on climate change: Implications for conducting research and outreach. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 96 (2): 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L. S., J. S. Carlton, T. Haigh, M. C. Lemos, A. S. Mase, and M. Widhalm. 2017. Useful to Usable: Developing usable climate science for agriculture. Climate Risk Management 15: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, A. P., A. W. Thompson, and L. S. Prokopy. 2012. The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (1): 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reser, J. P., and J. K. Swim. 2011. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. American Psychologist 66 (4): 277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. 1983. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear-based attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook, eds. J. Caccioppo, and R. Petty, 153–176. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S., and R. D. Margerum. 2008. Landowner motivations for watershed restoration: Lessons from five watersheds. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (4): 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh Safi, A., W. James Smith, and Z. Liu. 2012. Rural Nevada and climate change: Vulnerability, beliefs, and risk perception. Risk Analysis 32 (6): 1041–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenza, J. C., G. B. Ploubidis, and L. A. George. 2011. Climate change and climate variability: personal motivation for adaptation and mitigation. Environmental Health 10 (1): 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, C. L., and J. E. Leahy. 2014. Application of a modified health belief model to the pro-environmental behavior of private well water testing. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50 (6): 1515–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomich, T. P., S. Brodt, H. Ferris, R. Galt, W. R. Horwath, E. Kebreab, J. H. Leveau, D. Liptzin, M. Lubell, P. Merel, and R. Michelmore. 2011. Agroecology: A review from a global-change perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA ERS. 2017a. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. State Fact Sheets. Indiana. https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?reportPath=/StateFactSheets/StateFactSheets&StateFIPS=18&ID=17854#Pcdea0e5a28a1483f9342ad5d94a118ce_2_428iT15C0x0.

  • USDA ERS. 2017b. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. State Fact Sheets. Nebraska. https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?reportPath=/StateFactSheets/StateFactSheets&StateFIPS=18&ID=17854#Pcdea0e5a28a1483f9342ad5d94a118ce_2_428iT15C0x0.

  • USDA NASS. 2013. Crop production 2012 summary. United States Department of Agriculture.

  • Walthall, C. L., C. J. Anderson, L. H. Baumgard, E. Takle, and L. W. Morton. 2013. Climate change and agriculture in the United States: Effects and adaptation. USDA.

  • Weber, E. U. 1997. Perception and expectation of climate change. In Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management, eds. P. Slovic, M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, and K. A. Wade-Benzoni, 314–341.

  • Weber, E. U., and P. C. Stern. 2011. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist 66: 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Sectoral Applications Research Program (SARP) Grant Number NA13OAR431012 and USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant Number 2011-68002-30220. We thank the many agricultural advisors who agreed to be interviewed for this research. We also thank three anonymous reviewers, who provided valuable and useful feedback incorporated into this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda S. Prokopy.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This research was reviewed and granted approval by the Purdue University Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Church, S.P., Dunn, M., Babin, N. et al. Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern U.S. Ag advisors’ views on drought, climate change, and risk management. Agric Hum Values 35, 349–365 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9827-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9827-3

Keywords

Navigation