Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) November 24, 2016

Jane Addams und ihre internationale Ethik eines sozialen Radikalismus: globale Gerechtigkeit als realistische Utopie

  • Molly Cochran EMAIL logo

Abstract

As a philosophy with human problems at its centre and in a time of rapidly changing social conditions, classical Pragmatism engaged an ethics of social radicalism, an ethics that extended as far as human problems do: to the global. To understand how ideas like global justice are generated within pragmatism, it is important to examine not only the thought, but also the activism of pragmatists and how the experimental method of pragmatism was applied to global problems of its day. The life and work of Jane Addams is particularly rich for this kind of investigation. Addams met human problems at both local and global levels with the working hypothesis of applying and observing what a democratic attitude of radical social justice brings to felt indeterminacies. This article begins by comparing and contrasting a pragmatist approach to global justice as opposed to one better known, that of John Rawls, and moves on to examining the difference that Addams’s experience as a woman and an activist makes to how she practiced the pragmatist method in relation to global problems of the Progressive Era.

Literatur

Addams, J. (1929), A Toast to John Dewey, in: dies., Series 3: Speeches and Publications, 1878–1935, Box 10 Jane Addams Collection, Microfilm, Swarthmore, Penn.Search in Google Scholar

Addams, J. (2002), The Major Works of Jane Addams, Electronic Edition, Charlottesville, Va.Search in Google Scholar

Addams, J., Balch, E., u. Hamilton, A. (1915), Women at the Hague, Amherst, N. Y.Search in Google Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1939), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, London.Search in Google Scholar

Cochran, M. (1999), John Dewey as an International Thinker, in: dies. (Hg.), The Cambridge Companion to John Dewey, Cambridge, 309–336.10.1017/CCOL9780521874564.015Search in Google Scholar

Deegan, M. J. (1988), Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918, New Brunswick, N. J.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1929), Characters and Events 2, hg. v. Ratner, J., New York.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1996), The Collected Works, 1882–1953, Electronic Edition, Charlottesville, Va.Search in Google Scholar

James, W. (1904), Remarks at the Peace Banquet, in: Atlantic Monthly 94, 845–847.Search in Google Scholar

James, W. (1910), The Moral Equivalent of War, in: Popular Science Monthly 77, 400–410.10.1037/13766-011Search in Google Scholar

Hamington, M. (2007), Two Leaders, Two Utopias: Jane Addams and Dorothy Day, in: National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 159–186.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1999), The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, Mass. (dt.: Das Recht der Völker, übers. v. Hinsch, W., Berlin u. New York 2002).10.1515/9783110898538Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, M. (2009), Dewey, Pluralism and Democracy: A Response to Robert Talisse, in: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45.1, 75–79.10.2979/tra.2009.45.1.75Search in Google Scholar

Simmons, A. J. (2010), Ideal and Nonideal Theory, in: Philosophy and Public Affairs 38.1, 5–36.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.xSearch in Google Scholar

Talisse, R. (2007), A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, London.10.2139/ssrn.1208962Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-24
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2016-0055/html
Scroll to top button