Abstract
In this paper, I will argue that Grant’s critique of liberal modernity is significant because it demonstrates a deeper or more substantive critique of liberalism, a critique that implies the falsity of a fashionable objection to Grant. This objection, represented by Michael Ignatieff, suggests that Grant’s attachment to British Toryism is simply an outdated idiosyncrasy unworthy of attention, and certainly not central to the continued significance of Grant. If my reading of Grant’s critique of liberal modernity is correct, however, this objection is flawed. Grant’s attachment to the British way of politics was not simply nostalgia; rather, he saw it as the only viable way to stop, and after 1963—slow—the gradual erosion of Canadian sovereignty. Thus, Grant’s Anglo-Canadian Toryism is at the very heart of his Canadian nationalism, properly understood.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cockram, N.R. (2023). What Are We Lamenting? George Grant’s High Toryism as a Form of Canadian Nationalism. In: Chamberlain, T. (eds) Reading George Grant in the 21st Century. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44889-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44889-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44888-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44889-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)