Skip to main content
Log in

Some philosophical thoughts on the nature of technology

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

Much of the effort put into discovering or defining the nature of technology has been along “party lines,” for example, either favoring technology or not. Although there is a clear divergence in the stand that various authors take with respect to this topic, I believe they share a common assumption, namely, that there is such a thing as “the essence” or “nature” of technology. My claim in this paper is that the broad use to which we put the term “technology” is better understood on the model of “family resemblance,” a model put forward by Ludwig Wittgenstein, than it is on models that utilize the notion of “essence” or “nature.” Not only does the family resemblance model serve us better in understanding the wide variety of uses of the term, but it also helps to ameliorate the antipathy between the parties that their discussions often invoke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cogan, J.M. Some philosophical thoughts on the nature of technology. Know Techn Pol 15, 93–99 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-002-1008-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-002-1008-y

Keywords

Navigation