Skip to main content
Log in

Business Student Ethics: Selected Predictors of Attitudes Toward Cheating

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

This research addresses the frequently reported finding that business education reduces the ethical sensitivity of students. It presents evidence that supports the view that much of the prior research has relied upon a narrow set of explanatory variables as well as dependent measures of ethical reasoning that often lacked external validity. This research proposes instead, a dependent measure based on students' attitudes toward academic dishonesty and the use of two additional independent variables, locus of control and personality type. In an empirical study,both locus of control and personality type were found to significantly influence students' attitudes to academic dishonesty. Students who studied business however, were no more tolerant of academic dishonesty than students in other programs. Nor did they have a different locus of control or personality-type. Locusof control and personality type were however,significantly correlated. Findings also support the predictive utility of using cheating to understand ethical attitudes in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Antion D. L. and W. B. Michael: 1983, 'Short Term Predictive Validity of Demographic, Affective, Personal and Cognitive Variables in relation to Two Criterion Measures of Cheating Behaviors', Educational and Psychological Measurement 43, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow P.: 1991, 'Personality Characteristics in College Students' Evaluation of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L. and I. Ajzen: 1991, 'Predicting Dishonest Actions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior', Journal of Research in Personality 25, 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. M. Shepard: 1989, 'Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behaviour', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K. and J. P. Near: 1995, 'Estimating the Incidence of Wrongdoing and Whistle Blowing: Results of a Study using Randomized Response Technique', Journal of Business Ethics 14(1), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheating in College: 1976, Time June 7, 29–30.

  • Collins, B. E.: 1974, 'Four Components of the Rotter Internal-External Scale', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29(3), 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F. and M. S. Spiller: 1999, 'Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research', Journal of Business Ethics 17(6), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., M. Pierce, L. R. Yandell and P. S. Arnow: 1995, 'Cheating in College and the Type A Personality: A Reevaluation', College Student Journal 29(4), 493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B. and D. J. Good: 1989, 'Perceptual Differences of Sales Practitioners and Students Concerning Ethical Behavior', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 667–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1983, 'Ethical Behavior of Marketing Managers', Journal of Business Ethics 2, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. M. and K. B. Melvin: 1988, 'A Scale for Measuring Attitude toward Cheating', Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26(5), 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. Jr. and L. Broom: 1988, 'Attitudes Towards Ethics: A View of the College Student', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 617–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston J. P.: 1976, 'Amount of Loci of Classroom Answer Copying, Spaced Seating and Alternate Test Forms', Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 729–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss, M. T., J. P. Curnyn, S. L. Roberts and S. F. Davis et al.: 1993, 'Hard Driven but not Dishonest: Cheating and the Type A Personality', Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31(5), 429–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, C.: 1993, 'Ethical development of Accounting Students, Non-Accounting Students and Liberal Arts Students', Issues in Accounting Education 8, 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkings C. D., S. J. Zanski and R. H. Rosenmann: 1979, Manual for the Jenkins Activity Survey, Psychological Corp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, L. R.: 1980, 'Stimulus Condition Self-Selection by Males in the Interaction of Locus of Control and Skill Chance Situations', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(1), 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A. and T. K. Srull: 1978, 'Effects of Personality and Situational Variation in Locus of Control on Cheating: Determinance of the Congruence Effect', Journal of Personality 46, 72–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A. and L. Worell: 1978, 'Personality Characteristics, Parent Behaviours, and Sex of Subject in Relation to Cheating', Journal of Research in Personality 12, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmeyer, S. L. and K. Biggers 1988, 'Environmental Demand and Demand Engendering Behavior: An Observational Analysis of the Type A Pattern', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 997–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. C.: 1995, 'Ethics of Business Students: Some Marketing Perspectives', Journal of Business Ethics 14(7), 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. S. and D. Schaupp: 1989, 'Ethics in Education: A Comparative Study', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 943–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leming, J. S.: 1980, 'Cheating Behavior Subject Variables and Components of the Internal-External Scale under High and Low Risk Conditions', Journal of Educational Research 74(2), 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysonski S. and W. Gaidis: 1991, 'A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethics of Business Students', Journal of Business Ethics 10(2), 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, C. and K. Berger: 1996, 'Undergraduate Student Attitudes about Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas', Journal of Business Ethics 15(5), 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K. and B. L. Peery: 1996, 'Selected Individual Differences and Collegian' Ethical Beliefs', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols and T. W. Zimmerer: 1985, 'Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes', Journal of Business Ethics 4(3), 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, D., T. Mahaffey, K. MacAulay and T. Hynes: 1999, 'The Effect of Business Education on the Ethics of Students: An Empirical Assessment Controlling for Maturation', Teaching Business Ethics 3, 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. and I. H. Bernstein: 1994, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovicharchyn, C. A., H. Johnson and T. Petzel: 1981, 'Type A Behavior, Academic Aspirations, and Academic Success', Journal of Personality 49(3), 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A. R., K. M. Kane, K. J. Bernesser and P. T. Spicker: 1990, 'Type A Behavior, Competitive Achievement-Striving, and Cheating among College Students', Psychological Reports 66(2), 459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preble, J. F. and A. Reichel: 1988, 'Attitudes Towards Business Ethics of Future Managers in the U.S. and Israel', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 941–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1966, 'Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement', Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, Whole No. 609.

  • Sierles, F., I. Hendrickx and S. Circle: 1980, 'Cheating in Medical School', Journal of Medical Education 55, 124–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, T. K. and S. A. Karabenick: 1975, 'Effects of Personality-Situation Locus of Control Congruence', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(4), 617–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E. and F. Stevens: 1987, 'Ethical Inclinations of Tomorrow' Managers Revisited: How and Why Students Cheat', Journal of Education for Business 63(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre., K. E., E. S. Nelson and A. L. Gabbin: 1990, 'A Study of the Ethical Development of Accounting Majors in Relation to Other Business and Non-Business Disciplines', The Accounting Educators Journal 3, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J., K. Gilbert, P. Giordano and S. F. Davis: 1993, 'Academic Dishonesty, Type A Behavior, and Classroom Orientation', Bulletin of Psychonomic Society 31(2), 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. S. and R. S. Dooley: 1993, 'Ethical or Practical: an Empirical Study of Students' Choices in Simulated Business Scenarios', Journal of Business Ethics 12(8), 643–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. A., J. G. Longnecker, J. A. McKinney and C. W. Moore: 1988, 'Ethical Attitudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, N., Mahaffey, T. Business Student Ethics: Selected Predictors of Attitudes Toward Cheating. Teaching Business Ethics 4, 121–136 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009855128668

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009855128668

Keywords

Navigation