Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genes, religion and society: The developing views of the churches

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper (1) reviews and analyzes the positions on genetics taken in the official statements of Christian churches in the United States, together with church institutions of global status, and 2) offers suggestions about possible future responses of the churches to genetics and biotechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramsey, P. (1970) Fabricated Man: The Ethics of Genetic Control, Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The General Convention of the Episcopal Church, “Resolution on Genetic Engineering Research,” Journal (1985), House of Bishops, New York, p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Church of Christ, General Synod 17, “A Pronouncement on the Church and Genetic Engineering,” Social Policy Action. (1989), Office for Church in Society, United Church of Christ, Cleveland, p. 30.

  4. National Council of Churches, “Human Life and the New Genetics” (1980), National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., New York, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Council of Churches, “Genetic Engineering: Social and Ethical Consequences,” (1983) National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., New York, pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Council of Churches (1983),. p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. United Methodist Church, (1992) “New Developments in Genetic Science,” The Book of Resolutions of the United Methodist Church 1992,: The United Methodist Publishing House, Nashville, TN, p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a constructive proposal, see Cole-Turner, R. (1993) The New Genesis: Theology and the Genetic Revolution, Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville, KY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramsey (1970),. pp. 144–145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramsey (1970),. p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Council of Churches, “Manipulating Life” (1982), World Council of Churches, Subunit on Church and Society, Geneva, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Stone, R. (1995) “Religious Leaders Oppose Patenting Genes and Animals,” Science 268: 1126; Cole-Turner, R. (1995) “Religion and Gene Patenting,” Science 270: 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. United Church of Christ (1989), p. 30.

  14. John Paul II (1982) “Biological Research and Human Dignity,” p. 342.

  15. United Church of Christ (1989), p. 30.

  16. John Paul II (1982), p. 343.

  17. John Paul II (1983), “The Ethics of Genetic Manipulation,” p. 388.

  18. John Paul II (1983), p. 389.

  19. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation.” (1987) Origins 16: 702.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bouma III, H., Diekema, D., Langerak, E., Rottman, T. & Verhey, A. (1989) Christian Faith, Health, and Medical Practice, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI, p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Outler, A.C. (1973) “The Beginnings of Personhood: Theological Considerations,” Perkins Journal 27 (Fall):32. Cf. Cole-Turner, R. & Waters, B. (1996), Pastoral Genetics: Theology and Care at the Beginning of Life, Pilgrim Press, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cf. Peters, T. (1996) For the Love of Children: Genetic Technology and the Future of the Family, Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville, KY; and Cole-Turner and Waters (1996) Pastoral Genetics.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Foundation on Economic Trends, 1983.

  26. National Council of Churches, “Genetic Science for Human Benefit.” (New York: National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., 1986), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  27. United Church of Christ, p. 30. For a theological assessment of germ-line experimentation, see Shinn, R. L. (1996) The New Genetics: Challenges for Science, Faith, and Politics, Moyer Bell, Wakefield, RI, pp. 123–145.

  28. World Council of Churches, “Biotechnology: Its Challenges to the Churches and the World,” (1989) World Council of Churches, Subunit on Church and Society, Geneva, p. 23.

  29. National Council of Churches (1986), p. 10.

  30. National Council of Churches (1986), p. 14.

  31. United Church of Christ, p. 30.

  32. United Methodist Church (1992), p. 333.

  33. National Council of Churches (1986), p. 14.

  34. Cf. Land, R.D. & Mitchell, C.B. (1996), “Patenting Life: No,” First Things (May): 20–22.

  35. Cf. Peters, T. (1996) “Patenting Life: Yes,” First Things (May):18–20; and Cole-Turner, “Religion and Gene Patenting.”

  36. World Council of Churches (1989), p. 12.

  37. National Council of Churches (1986), p. 3.

  38. National Council of Churches (1986), p. 16.

  39. United Methodist Church (1992), p. 336.

  40. United Church of Christ (1989), p. 30.

  41. Few books on genetics are specifically for elergy. Among them is Fletcher, J.C. (1982), Coping with Genetic Disorders: A Guide for Clergy and Parents, Harper & Row, New York; and Cole-Turner and Waters (1996), Pastoral Genetics.

    Google Scholar 

  42. National Council of Churches (1986), p. 16.

  43. United Church of Christ (1989), p. 30.

  44. Anderson, W.F. (1994) Genetic Engineering and Our Humanness, Human Gene Therapy 5: 755–760, at 758.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goldberg, S. (1995) “Gene Patents and the Death of Dualism,” pre-publication copy, p. 27.

  46. Cf. Parens, E. (1996) “Taking Behavioral Genetics Seriously,” Hastings Center Report (July–August): 13–18.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, 616 North Highland Avenue, 15206-2596, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Ronald Cole-Turner (Associate Professor of Theology and Ethics)

Authors
  1. Ronald Cole-Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole-Turner, R. Genes, religion and society: The developing views of the churches. SCI ENG ETHICS 3, 273–288 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0033-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0033-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation