Abstract
This handbook entry examines the issue of housing in the Anthropocene. The issue of housing in the Anthropocene involves many factors and aspects with respect to housing given the facts of climate change. To limit these factors and possible through-lines for this entry, housing in the Anthropocene will be analyzed according to three dimensions to make sense of the future of housing needs alongside climate change: (1) Housing and human population. The fundamental questions with respect to housing in the Anthropocene involve human population, and the concurrent creation of more housing given increases in the human population in the future; (2) Housing and spatial requirements. Following on from the extra requirements for human housing given increases in human population, the critical issue of spatial requirements for this housing will be addressed; (3) Housing and net zero. The third section of this entry examines the possibility of housing in the Anthropocene reaching net zero and thus not contributing further to climate change. For the purposes of this entry, a time ceiling of 2050 will constrain each section, and limit the possibility of this entry becoming embroiled in overly speculative science fiction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armaroli, N., & Balzani, V. (2007). The future of energy supply: Challenges and opportunities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46(1–2), 52–66.
Baghi, Y., Ma, Z., Robinson, D., & Boehme, T. (2021). Innovation in sustainable solar-powered net-zero energy solar decathlon houses: A review and showcase. Buildings, 11(4), 171.
Balouktsi, M. (2020). Carbon metrics for cities: Production and consumption implications for policies. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), 233–259.
Bataille, C., Waisman, H., Colombier, M., Segafredo, L., Williams, J., & Jotzo, F. (2016). The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(sup1), S7–S26.
Birkeland, J. (2020). Net-positive design and sustainable urban development. Routledge.
Cole, D. R. (2021). Caught between the air and earth: A schizoanalytic critique of the role of the education in the development of a new airport. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54, 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1864322. Accessed 28 Feb 2022
Cole, D. R. (2022). Education, the Anthropocene, and Deleuze/Guattari. Brill.
Cole, D. R., & Baghi, Y. (2022). When two worlds collide: Creatively reassessing the concept of a house beyond the human. Qualitative Inquiry, 28, 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211065800. Accessed 28 Feb 2022
Cole, D. R., & Somerville, M. (2020). The affect(s) of literacy learning in the mud. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43, 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1818183. Accessed 28 Feb 2022
Elnabawi, M. H., & Saber, E. (2021). Reducing carbon footprint and cooling demand in arid climates using an integrated hybrid ventilation and photovoltaic approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 3396–3418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01571-1
Guattari, F. (2005). The three ecologies (I. Pindar and P. Sutton, Trans.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Huang, L., Krigsvoll, G., Johansen, F., Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018). Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1906–1916.
Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological economics, 70(5), 873–880.
Moritz, C., & Agudo, R. (2013). The future of species under climate change: Resilience or decline? Science, 341(6145), 504–508.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2018). Urbanization. https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020). Energy. https://ourworldindata.org/energy. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Rumbach, A. (2017). At the roots of urban disasters: Planning and uneven geographies of risk in Kolkata, India. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(6), 783–799.
Soriano, C. (2018). The Anthropocene and the production and reproduction of capital. The Anthropocene Review, 5(2), 202–213.
SRD (Statistica Research Department). (2022). Size of floor area in new single-family homes in the U.S. 1975–2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/529371/floor-area-size-new-single-family-homes-usa/. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
TECLA. (2022). 3D printed house. https://www.3dwasp.com/casa-stampata-in-3d-tecla/. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
UN (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2019). Growing at a slower pace, world population is expected to reach 9.7 billion in 2050 and could peak at nearly 11 billion around 2100. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2019.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Wilson, L. (2014). How big is a house? Average house size by country. http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/how-big-is-a-house. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cole, D.R., Baghi, Y. (2023). Housing. In: Wallenhorst, N., Wulf, C. (eds) Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_195
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_195
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25909-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25910-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)