Abstract
Between formal propositional knowledge and embodied skill lies ‘interactional expertise’—the ability to converse expertly about a practical skill or expertise, but without being able to practice it, learned through linguistic socialisation among the practitioners. Interactional expertise is exhibited by sociologists of scientific knowledge, by scientists themselves and by a large range of other actors. Attention is drawn to the distinction between the social and the individual embodiment theses: a language does depend on the form of the bodies of its members but an individual within that community can learn the language without the body. The idea has significance for our understanding of colour-blindness, deafness and other abilities and disabilities.
They say that love's a word,
a word we've only heard the meaning of.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverley Hills and London: Sage [second edition University of Chicago Press, 1992].
Collins, H. M. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Collins, H. M. 1996a. Embedded or embodied: Hubert Dreyfus's what computers still can't do. Artificial Intelligence 80(1): 99–117.
Collins, H. M. 1996b. Interaction without society?: What Avatars can't do. In: M. Stefik (ed), Internet Dreams, pp. 317–326. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Collins, H. M. and Kusch, M. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collins, H. M. 2000. Four kinds of knowledge, two (or maybe three) kinds of embodiment, and the question of artifical intelligence. In: J. Malpas and M. Wrathall (eds), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 2, pp. 179–195. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collins, H. and Evans, R. with Murdoch, J. Speers, T. Cole, S. and Gorman, M. in preparation. Expertise.
Dennett, D. 1982. Where am I. In: D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett (eds), The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul pp. 217–229. London: Penguin.
Dreyfus, H. L. 1972. What Computers Can't Do. New York: Harper and Row.
Dreyfus, H L. 1992. What Computers Still Can't Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackson, F. 1986. What Mary didn't now. Journal of Philosophy. 83: 291–295.
Collins, H. M. and Kusch, M. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kennefick, D. 2000. The star crushers: Theoretical practice and the theoretician's regress. Social Studies of Science. 30(1): 5–40.
Ladd, P. 2003. Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Pamplin, B. R. and Collins, H. M. 1975. Spoon bending: An experimental approach. Nature 257(September): 8.
Sacks, O. 1985. The Man Who Mistook his Wife for a Hat. London: Duckworth.
Sacks, O. 1989. Seeing Voices: A Journey into the World of the Deaf. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Sacks, O. 1996. The Island of the Colour-Blind and Cycad Island. London: Picador
Selinger, E. 2003. The necessity of embodiment: The Dreyfus-Collins debate. Philosophy Today 47(3): 266–279.
Stephenson, N. 1992. Snow Crash. New York: Bantam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collins, H. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3, 125–143 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a