Skip to main content
Log in

Problems with “persons”

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. J. Harris,The Value of Life: an Introduction to Medical Ethics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Singer,Practical Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Supra n.1,. at 18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Supra n.2,. at 87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Supra n.2,. at 94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Supra n.2, at 95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. W. Brock,Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Supra n.1,. at 18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Supra n.1,. at 19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Supra n.1,. at 18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Supra n.1,. at 14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Supra n.1,. at 14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Supra n.1,. at 14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Supra n.1,. at 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Supra n.1,. at 15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Supra n.1,. at 15.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Supra n.1,. at 15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Supra n.1,. at 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Supra n.1,. at 15. Note that Singer also does not explicitly claim that rationality and self-consciousness are necessary and sufficient conditions for personhood, only that he accepts “definitions” in these terms, and that “I propose to use ‘person’, in the sense of a rational and self-conscious being”—supra n.2,P. Singer,Practical Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 2nd ed.). at 87.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Grobstein,From Chance to Purpose (London: Addison Wesley, 1981), 102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Supra n.1,. at 13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Supra n.1,. at 13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Supra n.1,. at 14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Supra n.7,, at 368.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Supra n.7,, at 364.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Supra n.7,, at 372–73.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Supra n.7,, at 373.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Supra n.7,, at 375.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Supra n.7,, at 375.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Supra n.7,, at 376.

    Google Scholar 

  31. How could a sentient non-person be consciously aware of an interest in avoidingunnecessary pain?

  32. Supra n.2, P. Singer,Practical Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 2nd ed.). at 94.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Supra. n.2 at 276–80.

    Google Scholar 

  34. K.E. Goodpaster, “On Being Morally Considerable”, in D. VandeVeer and C. Pierce, eds.,The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book (Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1994), 105–12, at 109.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Supra, n.34, at 110.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M.A. Fox, “The Moral Community”, in H. LaFollette, ed.,Ethics in Practice: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 127–38, at 128.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Supra, n.36, at 129

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.A. Warren, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”, in LaFollettesupra, n.36, 79–90, at 84.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Supra, n.36, at 128.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M.A. Fox, “The Moral Community”, in H. LaFollette, ed.,Ethics in Practice: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 127–38, n.36, at 128.

    Google Scholar 

  41. T. Regan,The Case for Animal Rights (London: Routledge, 1988), at 151–56.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Supra, at n.41, at 151.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Supra, n.41, at 152.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Supra, n.41, at 152.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Supra, n.41, at 154.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Supra, n.41, at 185–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author would like to thankRes Publica's anonymous readers for reading and most helpfully commenting on earlier drafts. The paper develops ideas first expressed in Phillip Cole, “Dangerous Philosophies”,Radical Philosophy 72 (1995), July/August, 44–46; and in “The Futility of Bioethics”, a paper presented at the Consensus in Bioethics conference, University of Central Lancashire (October 1996). However, it constitutes a substantial revision of those earlier ideas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, P. Problems with “persons”. Res Publica 3, 165–183 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333603

Navigation