Abstract
In his extensive and revolutionary work, the biologist and philosopher Jakob von Uexküll examined the animal kingdom, laying the first foundations for a wider reflection on non-human animal agency in ecosystems. However, the scientist did not include in his reflection on Umwelt plants and fungi, widely considered passive organisms in the 1900s. In this paper, we will try to find the contact points between the biologist’s theories and contemporary botanical discoveries, taking into account some of the findings on plant agency, communication, and interaction even with fungi, crucial actors in the vegetal organization of the territory. The core of the work will be to demonstrate that plants could fit in an integrated and extended theory of Umwelt abandoning the “zoocentric” perspective that permeated the studies on botanical species. To achieve this aim, it will be necessary to first deconstruct the historical theorization of plants’ passivity, which has ancient roots and was enforced in some philosophical perspectives of the 20th century. Consequentially, with two focuses, the first one on communication and the second one on agency, the paper will highlight the possibilities and horizons that could be opened through a comparison between the theories of von Uexküll and nowadays botanical breakthroughs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Bebber, D. P., Boddy, L., Darrah, P. R., Fricker, M. D., & Hynes, J. (2007). Biological Solutions to Transport Network Design, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1623), 2307–2315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0459.
Bennet, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. A Political Ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Bergson, H. (2022). [1907]). Creative evolution. Routledge.
Brentari, C. (2015). Von Uexküll. The Discovery of the Umwelt between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology. Springer.
Buchanan, B. (2008). Onto-ethologies. The animal enviroments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Suny.
Calvo, P. (2016). The philosophy of Plant Neurobiology: A Manifesto. Synthese, 193, 1323–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1040-1.
Calvo, P., & Lawrence, N. (2022). Planta Sapiens. Unmasking Plant Intelligence. The Bridge Street.
Comollo, F. (2023). Decentrare Il pensiero: Spazi di radicalità vegetale. Liberazioni– Rivista Di Critica Antispecista, 52, 34–43.
Di Paola, M., & Pellegrino, G. (2019). Etica e politica delle piante. DeriveApprodi.
Fultot, M., & Turvey, M. T. (2019). Von Uexküll’s theory of meaning and Gibson’s organism-environment reciprocity. Ecological Psychology, 31(4), 289–315.
Gagliano, M., Renton, M., Depczynski, M., & Mancuso, S. (2014). Experience teaches plants to learn faster and forget slower in environments where it matters. Oecologia, 175, 63–72.
Haraway, D. (2016 [1985]). A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Minnesota Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010 [1817]), The philosophy of Nature. Kessinger Publishing.
Hiernaux, Q. (2019). History and epistemology of Plant Behaviour: A pluralistic view? Synthese, 198(4), 3625–3650.
Hiernaux, Q. (2023). From Plant Behaviour to Plant Intelligence? Éditions Quæ.
Janzen, D. H. (1966). Coevolution of Mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution, 20(3), 249–275.
Karst, J., Jones, M. D., & Hoeksema, D. (2023). Positive citation Bias and Overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests. Nat Ecol Evol, 7, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1.
Khait, I., Lewin-Epstein, O., Sharon, R., Saban, K., Goldstein, R., Anikster, Y., Zeron, Y., Agassy, C., Nizan, S., Sharabi, G., Perelman, R., Boonman, A., Sade, N., Yovel, Y., & Hadany, L. (2023). Sounds emitted by plants under stress are Airborne and Informative. Cell, 186(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.009.
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think. Toward an Anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
Krampen, M. (1981). Phytosemiotics. Semiotica, 36(3/4), 187–209.
Kull, K. (2000). An introduction to Phytosemiotics: Semiotic Botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 326–350.
Latour, B. (2014). Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History, 45(1), 1–18.
Lettow, S. (2022). The Figure of the Human. Philosophical Narratives in Sex, Race and Organic Kinship in the White (Man)thropocene. In S. Lettow, & S. Nessel (Eds.), Ecologies of Gender. Contemporary Nature Relations and the Nonhuman Turn (1st ed., pp. 189–205). Routledge Environmental Humanities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023319-16.
Lovejoy, A. O. (2001). [1936]). The great chain of being. A study of the history of an idea. Harvard University Press.
Mancuso, S., & Viola, A. (2013). Brilliant green. The surprising history and Science of Plant Intelligence. Island.
Marder, M. (2014). The philosopher’s plant. An intellectual herbarium. Columbia University.
Miller, E. P. (2002). The vegetative soul. From philosophy of Nature to Subjectivity in the feminine. State University of New York.
Peirce, C. S. (1998 [1894]). What Is a Sign? In Peirce, C. S., Houser, N., & Kloesel, C. J. W. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings Vol. 2 (1893–1913), Indiana University Press.
Plessner, H. (2019). [1928]). Levels of Organic Life and the human: An introduction to Philosophical Anthropology (forms of living). Fordham University.
Sandford, S. (2023). Vegetal Sex. Philosophy of Plants. Bloomsbury.
Scheler, M. (1962 [1928]). Man’s place in Nature. Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Sharov, A., & Tønnessen, M. (2021). Semiotic Agency. Science Beyond mechanism. Springer.
Sheldrake, M. (2020). Entangled life: How Fungi make our worlds, change our minds and shape our futures. Bodley Head.
van Hoven, W. (1991). Mortalities in Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) populations related to Chemical Defence in Trees. Journal of African Zoology, 105(2), 141–145.
von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt Und Innenwelt Der Tiere (1st ed.). Julius Springer.
von Uexküll, J. (2010). [1934/1940]). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. The New Synthesis. The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Witzany, G. (2008). The Biosemiotics of Plant Communication. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24(1/3), 39–56.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.C. wrote and reviewed the whole manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Comollo, F. A Foray into the Worlds of Plants and Fungi. Biosemiotics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09563-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09563-0