Skip to main content
Log in

Two sides to every question: The impact of news formulas on abortion policy options

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • ‘Abortion Cited by Both Sides.’ (1974).Times-Picayune States-Item, 23 January, p. 7.

  • Altheide, D. L.: 1976,Creating Reality: How TV News Distorts Events. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., Weathers, D., McCormick, J., Friendly, D., Abramson, P. and Bruno, M.: 1985, ‘America's Abortion Dilemma.’Newsweek, 14 January, 20-25.

  • Bond, F. F: 1954,An Introduction to Journalism. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K.: 1966,Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit, C. M.: 1990,Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communicating Social Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit, C. M. and Selzer, J. A.: 1985, ‘The Rhetoric of Objectivity in the Newspaper Coverage of a Murder Trial,’Critical Studies in Mass Communication 2, 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossfire: 1985, CNN, April.

  • Dionne, E. J. Jr.: 1989, ‘Poll on Abortion Finds the Nation Sharply Divided.’New York Times, 26 April.

  • Ehninger, D.: 1970, ‘Argument as Method: Its Nature, Its Limitations and Its Uses,’Speech Monographs 37, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N.: 1988, ‘Routines and the Making of Oppositional News,’Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5, 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyewitness News 4,’: 1984, WWL-TV, New Orleans, 23 January 1984.

  • Freeley, A. J.: 1981, 1961,Argumentation and Debate: Reasoned Decision-Making, 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frejka, T.: 1985, ‘Induced Abortion and Fertility’,Family Planning Perspectives 17, (5), 230–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, B.: 1990,Professional News Writing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garst, R. E. and Bernstein, T. M.: 1961,Headlines and Deadlines: A Manual for Copy Editors. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T.: 1980,The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, D.: 1981, “The Abortion Activists,”Planned Parenthood Perspectives, July/August 1981, 157-163.

  • Greenfield, M.: 1976, “Abortion: No Middle Ground,”Newsweek, 16 February.

  • Hackett, R. A.: 1984, “Decline of a Paradigm? Bias and Objectivity in News Media Studies,”Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1, 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Critcher, C. Jefferson, T, Clarke, J., and Roberts, B.: 1978,Policing the Crisis: Mugging, The State, and Law and Order. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C.: 1986,The ‘Uncensored War’: The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenberg, J.: 1983; 1960,The Professional Journalist. NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F.: 1981,The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komisar, L.: 1976, “Sellout on Abortion,”Newsweek, 9 June, p. 11.

  • Korzybski, A.: 1958; 1924,Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Clinton, MA: The Colonial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M.: 1992, “The Truth About Bush's Hypocrisy,”Time, 5 October, p. 44.

  • Luker, K.: 1984,Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmaney, T.: 1988, “When Abortion is Denied,”Newsweek, 22 August, p. 64.

  • Morrow, L.: 1977, “Of Abortion and the Unfairness of Life,”Time, 1 August, p. 40.

  • Railsback, C. C.: 1982, “Pro-life, Pro-choice: Different Conceptions of Value,”Women's Studies in Communication 5, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D.: 1990, “The News Paradigm and the Ideology of Objectivity: A Socialist atThe Wall Street Journal,”Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7, 390–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke, R. D. and Sillars, M. O.: 1984; 1975,Argumentation and the Decision-Making Process, 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • “RU-486: A Dialogue.”: 1992,The Network News. National Women's Health Network, September/October.

  • Sachs, A.: 1988, “Abortion on the Ropes,”Time, 5 December, pp. 58–59.

  • Saussure, F. de: 1974; 1915,Course in General Linguistics. London: Peter Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberger: 1976, “Ban All Abortions? Interviews Pro and Con,”U.S. News and World Report, 27 September, p. 27.

  • Taylor, C. A. and Condit, C. M.: 1988, “Objectivity and Elites: A Creation Science Trial,”Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5, 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G.: 1972, “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity,”American Journal of Sociology 77, 670–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., DeLung, J. S., Goldman, N. and Forrest, J. D.: 1981, “Abortions Preventable by Contraceptive Practice,”Family Planning Perspectives 133, (5), 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, C. A.: 1983,Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “What Do You Say?”: 1986, WCIA-TV. Urbana, IL. February.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Condit, C.M. Two sides to every question: The impact of news formulas on abortion policy options. Argumentation 8, 327–336 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733476

Keywords

Navigation