Skip to main content
Log in

The conflicts of postmodern and traditional epistemologies in curricular reform: A dialogue

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A radical opponent of Western higher education asserts that its pedagogy and content depend on belief in objective truth and knowledge. This epistemology and education are attacked as exclusive and domineering toward women, minorities, and non-Westerners. The critic puts forward a pragmatist epistemology, leading to multi-cultural education aimed at social criticism and personal autonomy. The critic's dialogue with a defender of traditional epistemological ideas provides a critical introduction to the claims justifying many radical criticisms of Western curricula and pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Arcilla, Rene: ‘Edification, Conversation, and Narrative: Rortyan Motifs for Philosophy of Education’, Educational Theory 40 (1990), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, Mary et al.: ‘Procedural Knowledge: Separate and Connected Knowing’, Chap. in Women's Ways of Knowing, Basic Books, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah: ‘On the Pursuit of the Ideal’, New York Review of Books, 17 March 1988, 11–18.

  • Boder, George: ‘Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge’, Journal of Chemical Education 63 (1986), 873–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Ernest: College: The Undergraduate Experience in America, Harper and Row, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee Kenneth: ‘Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind,”’ College English 46 (1984), 635–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee Kenneth: ‘Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge: A Bibliographical Essay’, College English 48 (1986), 773–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee Kenneth: ‘The Art of Collaborative Learning: Making the Most of Knowledgeable Peers’, Change, March/April 1987, 42–47.

  • Dewey, John: Democracy and Education, The Free Press, New York, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish Stanley: Is There a Text In This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzman, J. M.: ‘Lyotard's Paralogy and Rorty's Pluralism: Their Differences and Pedagogical Implications’, Educational Theory 40 (1990), 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford: ‘The Way We Think Now: Toward an Ethnography of Modern Thought’, Chap, in Local Knowledge, Basic Books, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford: ‘Anti Anti-Relativism’, American Anthropologist 86 (1984), 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, Kenneth: “The Social Constructionist Movement in Modem Psychology’, American Psychologist 40 (1985), 226–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, E. D.: Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, Jack: ‘Who Needs the Great Works?’, Harper's Magazine, September 1989, 43–52.

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair: Whose Justice? Which Rationalisty?, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre: ‘Relativism, Power, and Philosophy’, in Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, Michael Krausz, (ed.), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1989, pp. 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Parker: ‘Community, Conflict, and Ways of Knowing’, Change, September/October 1987, 20–25.

  • Perry William: ‘Cognitive and Ethical Growth: The Making of Meaning’, Chap, in The Modern American College, Arthur Chickering et al. (eds.) 76–116, Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: ‘Why Reason Can't Be Naturalized’, In After Philosophy: End or Transformation, Kenneth Baynes et al, pp. 222–224.

  • Rorty, Richard: ‘Hermeneutics, General Studies, and Teaching’, Synergos: Selected Papers from the Synergos Seminars, Vol. 2, George Mason University Press, Fairfax, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard: Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard: ‘Education, Socialization, and Individuation’, Liberal Education 75 (1989), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard: ‘Solidarity or Objectivity?’ in Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, Michael Krausz (ed.) University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame, 1989, pp. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barbara Herrnstein: Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Arthur: “The Opening of the American Mind’, The New York Times Book Review, 23 July 1989, 26ff.

  • Schweder, Richard: ‘Post-Nietzschian Anthropology: The Idea of Multiple Objective Worlds’, in Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, Michael Krausz, (ed.) University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1989, pp. 99–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimbur, John: ‘Collaborative Learning and Teaching Writing’, Chap, in Perspectives on Research and Scholarship in Composition, Ben McClelland and Timothy Donovan, (eds.) The Modern Language Association of America, New York, 1985, pp. 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cornwell, G., Johnson, B. The conflicts of postmodern and traditional epistemologies in curricular reform: A dialogue. Stud Philos Educ 11, 149–166 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372430

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372430

Key Words

Navigation