Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophical reflections on the foundations of mathematics

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article was written jointly by a philosopher and a mathematician. It has two aims: to acquaint mathematicians with some of the philosophical questions at the foundations of their subject and to familiarize philosophers with some of the answers to these questions which have recently been obtained by mathematicians. In particular, we argue that, if these recent findings are borne in mind, four different basic philosophical positions, logicism, formalism, platonism and intuitionism, if stated with some moderation, are in fact reconcilable, although with some reservations in the case of logicism, provided one adopts a nominalistic interpretation of Plato's ideal objects. This eclectic view has been asserted by Lambek and Scott (LS 1986) on fairly technical grounds, but the present argument is meant to be accessible to a wider audience and to provide some new insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, M.: 1986, ‘Fuzzy Set Theory and Topos Theory’, Can. Math. Bull. 29, 501–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. L.: 1988, Toposes and Local Set Theories, Oxford Logic Guides 14, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benacerraf, P. and H., Putnam (eds.): 1984, Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, E.: 1967, Foundations of Constructive Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buszkowski, W. et al. (eds.): 1988, Categorial Grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couture, J.: 1985, Analyticité et complétude, Cahiers d'épistémologie, Dépt. de philosophie de UQAM 8510, also in R. Nadeau (ed.), Contingence et Raison, Vrin-Bellarnin (to appear).

  • Couture, J.: 1989, ‘Are Substitutional Quantifiers a Solution to the Problem of Elimination of Classes in Principia Mathematica?’, in I., Winchester and K., Blackwell (eds.), Antinomies and Paradoxes, McMaster University Press, Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H.: 1963, Foundations of Mathematical Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, J. Y.: 1987, ‘Linear Logic’, J. Theoretical Computer Science 50, 1–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, R. 1979, Topoi, the Categorial Analysis of Logic, Studies in the Foundations of Mathematics 98, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, R. L.: 1970, Recursive Number Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969, The Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford University Press.

  • Kleene, S. C.: 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1976, ‘Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?’, in Evans and MacDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 325–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J. and P. J., Scott: 1986, Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawvere, F. W.: 1975, ‘Continuously Variable Sets: Algebraic Geometry = Algebraic Logic’, in H. E., Rose and J. C., Sheperdson (eds.), Proc. A.S.L. Logic Coll. Bristol, 1974, North-Holland Publishers Amsterdam pp. 135–156.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P.: 1984, Intuitionistic Type Theory, Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D.: 1965, Natural Deduction, Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1958, Mathematical Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • van, Heijenoort, J. (ed.): 1967, From Frege to Gödel, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. D.: 1978, ‘Mathematics as an Objective Science’, Amer. Math. Monthly 86, 540–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneale, W. and M., Kneale: 1971, The Development of Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J.: 1989, ‘On the Sheaf of Possible Worlds’, in J., Adamek and S., Mac Lane (eds.), Categorial Topology, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLane, S.: 1981, ‘Mathematical Models: A Sketch for the Philosophy of Mathematics’, Amer. Math. Monthly 88, 462–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. and A. N., Whitehead: 1910–1913, Principia Mathematica I–III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, W. W.: 1986, ‘Truth and Proof: the Platonism of Mathematics’, Synthese 69, 341–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Couture, J., Lambek, J. Philosophical reflections on the foundations of mathematics. Erkenntnis 34, 187–209 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385720

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385720

Keywords

Navigation