Abstract
Contemporary moral philosophy assumes an account of what it means to legitimately change one’s mind in ethics, and I wish to challenge this account by enlarging the category of the legitimate. I am just as eager to avoid illegitimate mind-changing brought on by deceit or brainwashing, but I claim that legitimacy should be defined in terms of transparency of method. A social reformer should not be embarrassed to admit that he acquired many beliefs about justice while reading Dickens. As such, appeals to the heart and the imagination are just as legitimate, within limits, as appeals to the mind; and showing can be as legitimate as telling. To demonstrate this, I consider the example of a vegetarian trying to ‘convert’ a carnivore. I then ask what it means when the carnivore claims to have been previously mistaken.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diamond, C., Anything but Argument?, in The Realistic Spirit. Boston: MIT Press, 1991a.
Diamond, C., Experiments on Animals, in The Realistic Spirit. Boston: MIT Press, 1991b.
Gaita, R., Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. London: Macmillan, 1989.
McDowell, J., Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?, in Mind, Value, Reality. Boston: Harvard UP, 1998.
Phillips, D.Z., Allegiance and Change in Morality, in Interventions in Ethics. London: Macmillan, 1992.
Regan, T. and Singer, P. (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
Rhees, R., Moral Questions, in Phillips D.Z. (ed.). London: Macmillan, 1999.
Scanlon, T., What We Owe To Each Other. New York: Belknap Press, 1998.
Singer, P., Animal Liberation, New York Review, 1975.
Williams, B., Internal and External Reasons, in Moral Luck. Cambridge: CUP, 1981.
Williams, B., Part II: Against, in Smart, J. and Williams, B. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: CUP, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowley, C. Changing One’s Mind on Moral Matters. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 8, 277–290 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-0351-y
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-0351-y