Abstract
Although memory experts have long advocated the use of bizarre imagery to aid memory, most research has failed to find bizarreness to be effective. Recently, bizarreness has been shown to be effective, but those experiments involved mixed lists in which each subject had both bizarre and nonbizarre materials. The goal of the present research was to use the same materials but in an unmixed-list design in which each subject had only bizarre or only nonbizarre sentences. Contrary to previous research, there were no significant differences between bizarre and nonbizarre conditions in terms of the number of individual words recalled, and bizarreness produced significantly lower recall of complete sentences. It was concluded that bizarreness is effective only when bizarre and nonbizarre materials are provided by the experimenter in a mixed-list situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Lorayne, H. How to develop a super-power memory. New York: Fell, 1957.
Merry, R. Image bizarreness in incidental learning. Psychological Reports, 1980, 46, 427–430.
Merry, R., & Graham, N. C. Imagery bizarreness in children’s recall of sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 1978. 69. 315–321.
Nappe, G. W., & Wollen, K. A. Effects of instructions to form common and bizarre mental images on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 100, 6–8.
Senter, R. J., & Hoffman, R. R. Bizarreness as a nonessential variable in mnemonic imagery: A confirmation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 7, 163–164.
Webber, S. M., & Marshall, P. H. Bizarreness effects in imagery as a function of processing level and delay. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1978, 2, 291–300.
Wollen, K. A., Weber, A., & Lowry, D. H. Bizarreness versus interaction of mental images as determinants of learning. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 518–523.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, S.D., Wollen, K.A. Bizarreness and recall. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 18, 244–245 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333616
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333616