Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrity, Commitment, and Indirect Consequentialism

  • Published:
The Journal of Value Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bernard Williams, “Integrity,” in J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (New York: Cambridge, 1973), pp. 108–17. See also John Harris, “Williams on Negative Responsibility and Integrity,” Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1974); Spencer Carr, “The Integrity of a Utilitarian,” Ethics 86 (1976); Peter Wenz, “The Incompatibility of Act—Utilitarianism with Moral Integrity,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (1979); Loren Lomasky, “A Refutation of Utilitarianism,” Journal of Value Inquiry 17 (1983); Sarah Conly, “Utilitarianism and Integrity,” Monist 66 (1983); Peter Railton, “Alienation, Consequentialism and the Demands of Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (1984); Gregory Trianosky, “Moral Integrity and Moral Psychology: A Refutation of Two Accounts of the Conflict Between Utilitarianism and Integrity,” Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (1986); Elizabeth Ashford, “Utilitarianism, Integrity, and Partiality,” The Journal of Philosophy 97 (2000); Damian Cox, Michael Levine and Marguerite La Caze, Integrity and the Fragile Self (Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2003), pp. 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Eugene Bales, “Act-Utilitarianism: Account of Right-Making Characteristics or Decision-Making Procedure?,” American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971); R. M. Hare, Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981); R. G. Frey, “Act-Utilitarianism,” in LaFollette, ed., Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).

  3. See Cox, Levine, and La Caze, op. cit, pp. 41–72.

  4. See Marcia Baron, Philip Pettit, and Michael Slote, Three Methods of Ethics (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Railton, op. cit., p. 154.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Damian Cox

Authors
  1. Damian Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian Cox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, D. Integrity, Commitment, and Indirect Consequentialism. J Value Inquiry 39, 61–73 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-006-1571-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-006-1571-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation