Skip to main content
Log in

Gulliver, Truth and Virtue

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the role of a notion of truth in our form of life? What is it to possess a notion of truth? How different would we be, if we did not possess a notion of truth? Gulliver’s description of three peoples encountered during his fifth travel will help me to answer. One might say that the basic anti-realist tenet is that we should explain the notion of truth by connecting it with our practice of assertion. In this sense the outcome of my commentary of the fifth part of Gulliver’s Travels will amount to a non-reductive anti-realist conception of truth. It can be called a dialectical conception of truth because it focuses on a particular way of resolving disagreements: an epistemically virtuous practice of verbal exchange that cares for truth. The main thesis is that an implicit awareness of the epistemically virtuous practice is a necessary condition for being in full possession of the notion of truth. The commentary will also involve an argument against deflationism and a critique of some claims made by Huw Price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dummett M (1976) What is a theory of meaning? (II). In: Evans G, McDowell J (eds) Truth and meaning. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M (1991) The logical basis of metaphysics. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich P (1996) Realism minus truth. Philos Phenomenol Res 56:877–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich P (2005) Truth, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch MP (2004) True to life. Why truth matters. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997) Complete Works, edited with an introduction by John M. Cooper. Hackett, Indianapolis/Cambridge

  • Price H (1998) Three norms of assertibility, or how the MOA became extinct. Nous 32:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price H (2003) Truth as convenient friction. J Philos 100:167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (1995) Is truth a goal of enquiry? Davidson Vs. Wright. The Philosophical Quarterly 45:281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift J (2005) Gulliver’s travels. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D (1998) The new dialectic. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C (1992) Truth and objectivity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was presented at the “Truth and Relativism” conference in Torino and Bologna (June 2010) and at the international workshop “Anti-realistic Notions of Truth” in Siena (September 2010); I am grateful to the participants for stimulating discussions. In particular, I thank Marilena Andronico, Marian David, Paul Horwich, Andrea Iacona, Paolo Leonardi, Diego Marconi, Sebastiano Moruzzi, Eva Picardi, Marco Santambrogio, Jason Stanley, Göran Sundholm, Gabriele Usberti, Giorgio Volpe, Bernhard Weiss. I am specially indebted to professor Dag Prawitz, by whose comments on an earlier draft I have greatly profited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesare Cozzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cozzo, C. Gulliver, Truth and Virtue. Topoi 31, 59–66 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9104-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9104-9

Keywords

Navigation