Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distributed Cognition: An Ectoderm-Centric Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distributed cognition is widely recognized as an approach to the study of all cognition. It identifies the distribution of cognitive processes between persons and technology, among people, and across time in the development of the social and material contexts for thinking. This paper suggests an ectoderm-centric perspective as the basis for distributed cognition, and in so doing redefines distributed cognition as the ability of an organism to interact with its environment for the purpose of satisfying its most basic physiological (internal and external) and social needs in order to survive and sustain itself. Underlying this ectoderm-centric perspective is a proposed theory of reactive and interactive learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach-Y-Rita, P. (2004). Tactile sensory substitution studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013, 83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (2011). Unconscious thought theory and its discontents: a critique of the critiques. Social Cognition, 29(6), 629–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2009). Unconscious behavioral guidance systems. In C. R. Agnew, D. E. Carlston, W. G. Graziano, & J. R. Kelly (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. J. (2005). Information and knowledge: an evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 10(4), Paper 239. http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.

  • Bates, M. J. (2006). Fundamental forms of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1033–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, B. (2007, July 31). Who’s minding the mind? New York Times.

  • Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1934). On the method of theoretical physics. Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, T. (2001). Touch. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J., & Blakeslee, S. (2004). On intelligence. New York: Times Books, Henry Holt and Company, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, R. L. (1981). Culture, symbols and human brain evolution: a synthesis. Dialectical Anthropology, 5, 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1994). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Biology of cognition. In Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (pp. 5–58). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge–the biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1991, June). Conscious machines. Paper presented at the 75th Anniversary Symposium on Science in Society: Machinery of Consciousness.

  • Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A. (1978). Touching: The human significance of the skin (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. L., & Persaud, T. V. N. (2003). The developing human: Clinically oriented embryology. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (1996). Concepts of cognition and consciousness: four voices. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1959). The correspondence of Isaac Newton (Vol. I).

  • Robles-De-La-Torre, G. (2006). Special issue on haptic user interfaces for multimedia systems: the importance of the sense of touch in virtual and real environments. IEEE Multimedia, 13(3), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (Fall 2008 Edition). Cognitive science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. URL: {http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/cognitive-science/}.

  • Trewavas, A. J., & Baluska, F. (2011). The ubiquity of consciousness. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 12(12), 1221–1225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the helpful discussions, comments and suggestions by J. Fonseca that helped focus the content in several sections of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime F. Cárdenas-García.

Additional information

Special Issue “Origins of Mind” edited by Liz Stillwaggon Swan and Andrew M. Winters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cárdenas-García, J.F. Distributed Cognition: An Ectoderm-Centric Perspective. Biosemiotics 6, 337–350 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9166-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9166-8

Keyword

Navigation