Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quotational theories of propositional attitudes

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bigelow, J. C., Meaning and believing that. (Presented at the annual N.Z. Philosophy Conference, Dunedin, 1974.)

  2. Bigelow J. C., ‘Contexts and Quotation I and II’, Linguistische Berichte 38 (1975), 1–21 and 39 (1975), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bigelow J. C., ‘Believing in Semantics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1978), 101–144.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burge T., ‘Belief and Synonymy’, The Journal of Philosophy 75 (1978), 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnap R., Logical Syntax of Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carnap R., Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1947 (second edition 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Church A., ‘On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’, Analysis 10 (1950), 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cresswell M. J., ‘Functions of Propositions’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 545–560.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cresswell M. J., Logics and Languages, Methuen, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cresswell M. J., ‘Identity and Intensional Objects’, Philosophia 5 (1975), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cresswell M. J., ‘Hyperintensional Logic’, Studia Logica 34 (1975), 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cresswell M. J., ‘Categorial Languages’, Studia Logica 36 (1977), 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson D., ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Actions, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davidson D., ‘On Saying that’ in D. Davidson and K. J. J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dowty D. R., Studies in the Logic of Verb Aspect and Time Reference in English, Linguistics Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dowty, D. R., Montague Grammar and the Lexical Decomposition of Causative Verbs [32, pp. 201–245].

  17. Dowty, D. R., ‘Toward a Semantic Theory of Word Formation in a Montague Grammar’, Texas Linguistic Forum (forthcoming).

  18. Feldman R. H., ‘Belief and Inscriptions’, Philosophical Studies 32 (1977), pp. 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fodor J. A., The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Geach P. T., Mental Acts, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haack, R. J. and Haack, S., ‘Token-sentences, Translation and Truth-value’, Mind 79, pp. 40-57.

  22. Kaplan D., ‘Quantifying In’, in D. Davidson and K. J. J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 206–242.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lakoff G., ‘On Generative Semantics’, in Semantics, An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis D. K., ‘General Semantics’, in D. Davidson and G. H. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972, pp. 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis D. K., Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis D. K., ‘Completeness and Decidability of Three Logics of Counterfactual Conditionals’, Theoria 37 (1971), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lycan W. G., ‘Davidson on Saying That’, Analysis, 33 (1972/73), 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCawley J. D., ‘Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar Without Deep Structure, in Darden et al. (eds.), Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1968, pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Montague R. M., in R. H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Partee B. H., ‘The Semantics of Belief Sentences’, in K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973, pp. 309–336.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Partee B. H. (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quine W. V. O., Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quine W. V. O., ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 53 (1956), 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scheffler I., The Anatomy of Inquiry, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stalnaker R. C., ‘A Theory of Conditionals’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, 1968, pp. 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thomason R. H., ‘Indirect Discourse is not Quotational’, The Monist 60 (1977), 340–354.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thomason, R. H., ‘A Model Theory for Propositional Attitudes’ (unpublished).

  38. Wallace J., ‘Belief and Satisfaction’, Noũs 6 (1972), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, NewZealand

    M. J. Cresswell

Authors
  1. M. J. Cresswell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cresswell, M.J. Quotational theories of propositional attitudes. J Philos Logic 9, 17–40 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258075

Keywords

Search

Navigation