Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 8, 2021

The Analysis of False Judgement According to Being and Not-Being in Plato’s Theaetetus (188c10–189b9)

  • Paolo Crivelli EMAIL logo

Abstract

The version of the paradox of false judgement examined at Tht. 188c10–189b9 relies on the assumption that to judge falsehoods is to judge the things which are not. The presentation of the argument displays several syntactic ambiguities: at several points it allows the reader to adopt different syntactic connections between the components of sentences. For instance, when Socrates says that in a false judgement the cognizer is “he who judges the things which are not about anything whatsoever” (188d3–4), how should the clause “about anything whatsoever” be construed? In common with “he who judges” and “the things which are not” (in which case the cognizer would be “he who judges about anything whatsoever the things which are not about it”), or exclusively with “he who judges” (in which case the cognizer would be “he who judges about anything whatsoever the things which are not”)? The most plausible answer is that both construals are envisaged. Accordingly, the argument has two branches corresponding to these two alternative construals. In particular, it attempts to show that in both cases the cognizer will address what does not exist – an impossibility. The idea that a false judgement is concerned with what is not about its reference has a clear echo in the Sophist. The way in which the problem is handled in the Theaetetus provides a hint that can help to find a solution for the hotly debated issue of the interpretation of the Sophist’s account of false statement.

Ackrill, J. 1966. “Plato on False Belief: Theaetetus 187–200”. The Monist 50, 383–402.10.5840/monist196650328Search in Google Scholar

Ambuel, D. 2015. Turtles All the Way Down. On Plato’s Theaetetus, a Commentary and Translation. Sankt Augustin.Search in Google Scholar

Angene, L.E. 1978. “False Judgement in the Theaetetus”. Philosophical Studies 33, 351–65.10.1007/BF00354203Search in Google Scholar

Anton, J.P./Kustas, G.L. (eds.) 1971. Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. i. Albany.Search in Google Scholar

Apelt, O. 1923. Platon, Theätet. 4th edn. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Aronadio, F. 2018. “L’articolazione argomentativa di Plat. Soph. 237b7–239a11 e la natura del medamos on”. Elenchos 39, 57–98.10.1515/elen-2018-0004Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J./Mignucci, M. (eds.) 1988. Matter and Metaphysics. Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum. Naples.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, A. 2006. “Falsche Meinung und Wissen im Theätet”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88, 296–313.10.1515/AGPH.2006.013Search in Google Scholar

Becker, A. 2007. Platon, Theätet. Frankfurt/M.Search in Google Scholar

Bene, L. 2008. “False Judgement and the Puzzles about Not-Being: Theaetetus 188c-189b”. In Havlíček et al., 2008, 217–49.Search in Google Scholar

Benson, H.H. 1992. “Why Is There a Discussion of False Belief in the Theaetetus?”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30, 171–99.10.1353/hph.1992.0023Search in Google Scholar

Bondeson, W.B. 1969. “Perception, True Opinion and Knowledge in Plato’s Theaetetus”. Phronesis 14, 111–22.10.1163/156852869X00082Search in Google Scholar

–. 1975. “Plato and the Foundations of Logic and Language”. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 6, 29–41.10.5840/swjphil19756231Search in Google Scholar

Bosanquet, B. 1888. Logic or the Morphology of Knowledge. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 1988. Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Brochard, V. 1897. De l’erreur. 2nd edn. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, L. 1986. “Being in the Sophist: A Syntactical Enquiry”. In Fine 1999, 455–78.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1994. “The Verb ‘To Be’ in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks”. In Everson 1994, 212–36.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood”. In Fine 2019, 309–36.Search in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 1988. “La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l’ontologie platonicienne”. In Barnes/Mignucci 1988, 19–127.Search in Google Scholar

Burnet, J. 1900–7. Platonis Opera. 5 vols. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1914. Greek Philosophy. i. Thales to Plato. London.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M.F. 1976. “Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving”. Classical Quarterly n.s. 26, 29–51.10.1017/S0009838800033784Search in Google Scholar

–. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis/Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1998. “Dissoi Logoi”. In Craig 1998, 106 f.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2002. “Plato on How Not to Speak of What Is Not”. In Canto-Sperber/Pellegrin 2002, 40–66.Search in Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. 1981. Platone, Dialoghi filosofici. ii. Turin.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, L. 1883. The Theaetetus of Plato. 2nd edn. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Canto-Sperber, M./Pellegrin, P. (eds.) 2002. Le style de la pensée. Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Carlill, H.F. 1906. The Theaetetus and Philebus of Plato. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Chappell, T. 2004. Reading Plato’s Theaetetus. Sankt Augustin.Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, F.M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato Translated with a Running Commentary. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Craig, E. (ed.) 1998. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. iii. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. 1990. “Il Sofista di Platone. Non essere, negazione e falsità”. Atti e memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere “La Colombaria” 55, 9–104.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1996. “The Argument from Knowing and Not Knowing in Plato’s Theaetetus (187e5–188c8)”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 96, 177–96.10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.177Search in Google Scholar

–. 1998. “ΑΛΛΟΔΟΞΙΑ”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80, 1–29.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2012. Plato’s Account of Falsehood. A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “Plato’s Philosophy of Language”. In Fine 2019, 481–505.Search in Google Scholar

Crombie, I.M. 1963. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. ii. Plato on Knowledge and Reality. London/Henley/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Denyer, N. 1991. Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

de Rijk, L.M. 1986. Plato’s Sophist. A Philosophical Commentary. Amsterdam/Oxford/New York.Search in Google Scholar

des Places, É. 1962. “Constructions grecques de mots à fonction double (ἀπὸ κοινοῦ)”. Revue des Études Grecques 75, 1–12.10.3406/reg.1962.3682Search in Google Scholar

Detel, W. 1972. Platons Beschreibung des falschen Satzes im Theätet und Sophistes. Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar

Diès, A. 1924. Platon, Théétète. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Duke, E.A./Hicken, W.F./Nicoll, W.S.M./Robinson, D.B./Strachan, J.C.G. 1995. Platonis Opera. i. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. 2016. “Thought as Internal Speech in Plato and Aristotle”. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19, 105–25.10.30965/26664275-01901008Search in Google Scholar

Dürr, K. 1945. “Moderne Darstellung der platonischen Logik: Ein Beitrag zur Erklärung des Dialoges ‘Sophistes’”. Museum Helveticum 2, 166–94.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, P. (ed.) 1967. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. vi. New York/London.Search in Google Scholar

El Murr, D. (ed.) 2013. La mesure du savoir. Études sur le Théétète de Platon. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Everson, S. (ed.) 1994. Language. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Ferejohn, M.T. 1989. “Plato and Aristotle on Negative Predication and Semantic Fragmentation”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 71, 257–82.10.1515/agph.1989.71.3.257Search in Google Scholar

Ferg, S. 1976. “Plato on False Statement: Relative Being, a Part of Being, and Not-Being in the Sophist”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14, 336–42.10.1353/hph.2008.0439Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2011. Platone, Teeteto. Milan.Search in Google Scholar

Fine G. 1979. “False Belief in the Theaetetus”. Phronesis 24, 70–80.10.1163/156852879X00045Search in Google Scholar

Fine G. (ed.) 1999. Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Plato. 2nd edn. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, H.N. 1921. Plato, Theaetetus, Sophist. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1967. Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von “… ist …” und “… ist nicht …” im Sophistes. Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1918/9. “Die Verneinung: Eine logische Untersuchung”. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1, 143–57.Search in Google Scholar

Giannopoulou, Z. 2013. Plato’s Theaetetus as a Second Apology. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695294.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gifford, E.H. 1905. The Euthydemus of Plato. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, M.L. 2012. Philosophos. Plato’s Missing Dialogue. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606184.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gosling, J.C.B. 1973. Plato. London/Boston.Search in Google Scholar

Greco, J./Sosa, E. (eds.) 1999. The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Malden, MA/Oxford.10.1111/b.9780631202912.1998.00001.xSearch in Google Scholar

Greene, W.C. 1938. Scholia Platonica. Haverford, PA.Search in Google Scholar

Grote, G. 1865. Plato, and the Other Companions of Sokrates. ii. London.Search in Google Scholar

Guthrie, W.K.C. 1978. A History of Greek Philosophy. v. The Later Plato and the Academy. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511518430Search in Google Scholar

Havlíček, A./Karfík, F./Špinka, Š. (eds.) 2008. Plato’s Theaetetus. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Platonicum Pragense. Prague.Search in Google Scholar

Heindorf, L.F. 1805. Platonis dialogi duo: Gorgias et Theaetetus. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1806. Platonis dialogi selecti: Cratylus, Parmenides, Euthydemus. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Heitsch, E. 1988. Überlegungen Platons im Theaetet. Mainz/Wiesbaden/Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, F. 1904. Platonstudien. Vienna.10.1002/mmnd.48019040210Search in Google Scholar

Horn, L.R. 1989, A Natural History of Negation. 2nd edn. Stanford.Search in Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A.M. 1990. “Presentation and Assent: A Physical and Cognitive Problem in Early Stoicism”. Classical Quarterly n.s. 40, 433–49.10.1017/S0009838800043007Search in Google Scholar

–. 1999. Platone, Teeteto. Bari/Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Jowett, B. 1892. The Dialogues of Plato. 3rd edn. iv. Oxford/London.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, C.H. 2004. “A Return to the Theory of the Verb Be and the Concept of Being”. Ancient Philosophy 24, 381–405.10.5840/ancientphil200424246Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “Why Is the Sophist a Sequel to the Theaetetus?”. Phronesis 52, 33–57.10.1163/156852807X177959Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, B.H. 1881. The Theaetetus of Plato. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Lafrance, Y. 2015. La théorie platonicienne de la doxa. 2nd edn. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, M.-K. 2019. “The Theaetetus”. In Fine 2019, 261–85.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190639730.013.13Search in Google Scholar

Levett, M.J./Burnyeat, M. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. In Burnyeat 1990, 257–351.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A.A. 2002. “Zeno’s Epistemology and Plato’s Theaetetus”. In Long 2006, 223–35.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279128.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

–. 2006. From Epicurus to Epictetus. Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

LSJ = Liddell, H.G./Scott, R./Jones, H.S. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th edn., with a rev. suppl. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511620614Search in Google Scholar

Mabbott, J.D./Ryle, G./Price, H.H. 1929. “Symposium: Negation”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volume 9, 67–111.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/9.1.67Search in Google Scholar

Martens, E. 1981. Platon, Theätet. Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Masino, A./Stefanini, L. 1944. Platone, Teeteto. Turin.Search in Google Scholar

Matthen, M. 1983. “Greek Ontology and the ‘Is’ of Truth”. Phronesis 28, 113–35.10.1163/156852883X00077Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, G. 1972. Plato’s Epistemology and Related Logical Problems. London.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiae, A. 1807. Ausführliche griechische Grammatik. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1973. Plato, Theaetetus. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1982. “Falsehood and Not-Being in Plato’s Sophist”. In Schofield/Craven Nussbaum 1982, 115–34.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.008Search in Google Scholar

Moore, G.E. 1953. Some Main Problems of Philosophy. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Moorhouse, A.C. 1959. Studies in the Greek Negatives. Cardiff.Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, J.M.E. 1960. “Συμπλοκὴ Εἰδῶν and the Genesis of Λόγος”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42, 117–29.Search in Google Scholar

Moss, J. 2014. “Plato’s Appearance-Assent Account of Belief”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 114, 213–38.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00371.xSearch in Google Scholar

Moss, J./Schwab, W. 2019. “The Birth of Belief”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 57, 1–32.10.1353/hph.2019.0000Search in Google Scholar

Narcy, M. 2008. “Socrate et le problème de l’erreur dans le Théétète”. In Havlíček et al. 2008, 180–202.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2013. “Pourquoi l’erreur ?”. In El Murr 2013, 95–128.Search in Google Scholar

Natorp, P. 1903. Platos Ideenlehre. Eine Einführung in den Idealismus. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Nuchelmans, G. 1973. Theories of the Proposition. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam/London.Search in Google Scholar

Oldenberg, H. 1873. De Platonis arte dialectica. Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar

Owen, G.E.L. 1971. “Plato on Not-Being”. In Vlastos 1971, 223–67.10.1007/978-1-349-86203-0_13Search in Google Scholar

Patzig, G. 1968. “Platon und das Problem des Irrtums”. In Patzig 1996, 73–92.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1996. Gesammelte Schriften. iii. Aufsätze zur antiken Philosophie. Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar

Peck, A.L. 1952. “Plato and the ΜΕΓΙΣΤΑ ΓΕΝΗ of the Sophist: A Reinterpretation”. Classical Quarterly n.s. 2, 32–56.10.1017/S000983880000762XSearch in Google Scholar

Peipers, D. 1874. Untersuchungen über das System Plato’s. i. Die Erkenntnisstheorie Plato’s mit besonderer Rücksicht auf den Theätet. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1883. Ontologia platonica. Ad notionum terminorumque historiam symbola. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Polansky, R.M. 1992. Philosophy and Knowledge: A Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus. Lewisburg/London/Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1948. “On What There Is”. In Quine 1961, 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1959. Methods of Logic. 2nd edn. New York/Chicago/San Francisco/Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1961. From a Logical Point of View. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Rees, D.A. 1971. “Aristotle’s Treatment of Φαντασία”. In Anton/Kustas 1971, 491–504.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, D.B. 1999. “Textual Notes on Plato’s Sophist”. Classical Quarterly n.s. 49, 139–59.10.1093/cq/49.1.139Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, R. 1950. “Forms and Error in Plato’s Theaetetus”. Philosophical Review 59, 3–30.10.2307/2181445Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, T.M. 1979. Contrasting Arguments. An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi. Salem, NH.Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, C. 2015. Plato, Theaetetus and Sophist. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Rowett, C. 2012. “On Making Mistakes in Plato: Theaetetus 187c–200d”. Topoi 31, 151–66.10.1007/s11245-012-9126-ySearch in Google Scholar

Rudebusch, G. 1990. “Does Plato Think False Speech Is Speech?”. Noûs 24, 599–609.10.2307/2215847Search in Google Scholar

Runciman, W.G. 1962. Plato’s Later Epistemology. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1910. “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood”. In Russell 1966, 147–59.10.1086/103890Search in Google Scholar

–. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. New York/London.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1966. Philosophical Essays. 2nd edn. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, G. 1960. “Letters and Syllables in Plato”. Philosophical Review 69, 431–51.10.2307/2183479Search in Google Scholar

–. 1967. “Plato”. In Edwards 1967, 314–33.Search in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. 1856. Platons Werke. ii.i. 3nd edn. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, H. 1877. Kritischer Commentar zu Platos Theätet. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Schofield, M./Craven Nussbaum, M. (eds.) 1982. Language and Logos. Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G.E.L. Owen. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511550874Search in Google Scholar

Schwyzer, E./Debrunner, A. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. ii. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2004. The Midwife of Platonism. Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford.10.1093/0199267030.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Seeck, G.A. 2010. Platons Theaitetos. Ein kritischer Kommentar. Munich.10.4000/books.chbeck.1354Search in Google Scholar

Sermamoglou-Soulmaidi, G. 2014. Playful Philosophy and Serious Sophistry. A Reading of Plato’s Euthydemus. Berlin/Boston.10.1515/9783110365870Search in Google Scholar

Sprague, R.K. 1962. Plato’s Use of Fallacy. A Study of the Euthydemus and Some Other Dialogues. London.Search in Google Scholar

Sprute, J. 1962. Der Begriff der DOXA in der platonischen Philosophie. Göttingen.10.13109/9783666250026Search in Google Scholar

Stallbaum, G. 1839. Platonis Theaetetus. Gotha/Erfurt/London.Search in Google Scholar

Stern, P. 2008. Knowledge and Politics in Plato’s Theaetetus. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511551246Search in Google Scholar

Stoelzel, E. 1908. Die Behandlung des Erkenntnisproblems bei Platon. Eine Analyse des platonischen Theätet. Halle.Search in Google Scholar

Szaif, J. 1998. Platons Begriff der Wahrheit. 2nd edn. Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, A.E. 1961. Plato, The Sophist and the Statesman. London.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, C.J. 2008. “Speaking of Something: Plato’s Sophist and Plato’s Beard”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38, 631–68.10.1353/cjp.0.0032Search in Google Scholar

Trabattoni, F. 2018. Platone, Teeteto. Turin.Search in Google Scholar

Untersteiner, M. 1949. I sofisti. Turin.Search in Google Scholar

Valgimigli, M. 1924. Platone, Teetèto. 13th edn. Rome/Bari, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (ed.) 1971. Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays. i. Garden City, NY.10.1007/978-1-349-86203-0Search in Google Scholar

Vogt, K.M. 2012. Belief and Truth. A Skeptic Reading of Plato. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199916818.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Warrington, J. 1961. Plato, Parmenides, Theaitetos, The Sophist, The Statesman. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Waterfield, R.H. 1987. Plato, Theaetetus. Harmondsworth.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, G. 1988. Phantasia in Classical Thought. Galway.Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. 1971. “Sentence Meaning, Negation, and Plato’s Problem of Non-Being”. In Vlastos 1971, 268–303.10.1007/978-1-349-86203-0_14Search in Google Scholar

Wohlrab, M. 1869. Platonis Theaetetus. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, R. 2004. “A Shaggy Soul Story: How Not to Read the Wax Tablet Model in Plato’s Theaetetus”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69, 573–604.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00519.xSearch in Google Scholar

Xenakis, J. 1957. “Plato on Statement and Truth-Value”. Mind 66, 165–72.10.1093/mind/LXVI.262.165Search in Google Scholar

–. 1957/8. “Essence, Being and Fact in Plato: An Analysis of One of Theaetetus ‘Koina’”. Kant-Studien 49, 167–81.10.1515/kant.1958.49.1-4.167Search in Google Scholar

Yang, T.-B. 2005. Platon in der philosophischen Geschichte des Problems des Nichts. Würzburg.Search in Google Scholar

Zagzebski, L. 1999. “What Is Knowledge?”. In Greco/Sosa 1999, 92–116.10.1002/9781405164863.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, E. 1875. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. ii.i. Sokrates und die Sokratiker. Plato und die alte Akademie. 3rd edn. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-10-08
Published in Print: 2023-11-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2020-0186/html
Scroll to top button