Abstract
The large-scale and intensive collection and analysis of digital data (commonly called “Big Data”) has become a common, popular, and consensual research method for the social sciences, as the automation of data collection, mathematization of analysis, and digital objectification reinforce both its efficiency and truth-value. This article opens with a critical review of the literature on data collection and analysis, and summarizes current ethical discussions focusing on these technologies. A semiotic model of data production and circulation is then introduced to problematize the view that digital data has ceased to stand for a formalization method (a possible kind of representation among others), and effectively “becomes the world itself” (a direct presentation of the world outperforming all other modes of representation). Following Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotics and pragmaticist philosophy, we characterize digitalization as a hypersymbolic semiotic process, and we highlight the naturalization of meaning, the illusion of iconicity, and rhetorical efficiency on which data’s truth value relies within the context of its large-scale, profit-driven, and results-oriented research uses. This outlines some epistemological and ethical implications of data’s visualization, use, and authority, and indicates avenues for critical semiotics of contemporary data science and analysis.
References
Anderson, C. 2008. The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wiredhttp://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16–07/pb_theory (accessed 30 January 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Andrejevic, M. 2014. The Big Data divide. International Journal of Communication 8. 1673–1689.Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J., K. D. Haggerty, D. Lyon & V. Steeves. 2014. Transparent lives: Surveillance in Canada. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.10.15215/aupress/9781927356777.01Search in Google Scholar
Berendt, B., M. Büchler & G. Rockwell. 2015. Is it research or is it spying? Thinking-through ethics in Big Data AI and other knowledge sciences. Künstliche Intelligenz 29(2). 223–232.10.1007/s13218-015-0355-2Search in Google Scholar
Bogost, I. 2010. Process versus procedure. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Whitehead Research Project. Claremont, California, 2–4 December 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Bollier, D. & C. M. Firestone. 2010. The promise and peril of Big Data. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute, Communications and Society Program. http://23.66.85.199/collateral/analyst-reports/10334-ar-promise-peril-of-big-data.pdf (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Bonenfant, M., F. Dumais & G. Trépanier-Jobin. 2017. Les pratiques transformatrices des espaces socionumériques. Montréal: PUQ.10.1353/book51983Search in Google Scholar
Bonenfant, M., A. Mondox, M. Ménard & M. Ouellet. 2015. Big Data, médiation symbolique et gouvernementalité. In E. Broudoux & G. Chartron (eds.), Big Data – open data: Quelles valeurs, quels enjeux? 31–41. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.10.3917/dbu.chron.2015.01.0031Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, D. & K. Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 15(5). 662–679.10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878Search in Google Scholar
Brooker, C. 2011–2017. Black mirror [TV series]. Endemol: Zeppotron/House of Tomorrow.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, I. & C. Marsden. 2013. Regulating code: Good governance and better regulation in the information age. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8879.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Caccamo, E. 2017. Imaginer les technologies de “mémoire totale” avec la science-fiction audiovisuelle occidentale (1990–2016). Étude sémiotique, intermédiale et technocritique des représentations de la mémoire personnelle. Université du Québec à Montréal PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Canadian Internet Public Policy Interest Clinic (CIPPIC). 2006. On the data trail: How detailed information about you gets into the hands of organizations with whom you have no relationship. Ottawa: Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. https://www.cippic.ca/sites/default/files/May1–06/DatabrokerReport.pdf (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Cassin, B. 2007. Intraduisible et mondialisation. Hermès 3. 197–204.10.4000/books.editionscnrs.15051Search in Google Scholar
Chaslot, G. 2018. Algotransparency. https://algotransparency.org/ (accessed 2 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Covington, P., J. Adams & E. Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for Youtube recommendations. In Proceedings tenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), 191–198. Boston: ACM.10.1145/2959100.2959190Search in Google Scholar
Dalton, C. & J. Thatcher.2014. What does a critical data studies look like and why do we care? Society Space 29. http://societyandspace.org/2014/05/12/what-does-a-critical-data-studies-look-like-and-why-do-we-care-craig-dalton-and-jim-thatcher/. accessed 9 July 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Deely, J. 2000. The green book: The impact of semiotics on philosophy. Paper presented at the First Annual Hommage to Oscar Parland, University of Helsinki, December.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 2002 [1981]. Francis Bacon: Logique de la sensation. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. & F. Guattari. 1980. Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie II. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Dyche, J. 2012. Big Data “eurekas!” don’t just happen. Harvard Business Review Blog. https://hbr.org/2012/11/eureka-doesnt-just-happen (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1978. Pour une reformulation du concept de signe iconique. Communications 29. 141–191.10.3406/comm.1978.1438Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1985 [1979]. Lector in fabula, le rôle du lecteur ou la Coopération interprétative dans les textes narratifs. Paris: Éditions Le Livre de Poche.Search in Google Scholar
Fisette, J. 2009. L’icone, l’hypoicone et la métaphore. L’avancée dans l’hypoicone jusqu’à la limite du non conceptualisable. Visual Culture 14(1). 7–46.Search in Google Scholar
Fisette, J. 2012. Courte lecture de la notion d’icône chez Peirce. Intellectica 58. 277–283.10.3406/intel.2012.1108Search in Google Scholar
Fisette, J. 2014. La photographie à l’infini. L’apport de la sémiotique de Peirce à l’étude de la photographie dans les médias. Special issue, Ocula 15. http://www.ocula.it/files/OCULA-15-PEIRCE-Fisette_%5B2,602.023Mb%5D.pdf (accessed 31 July 2017).10.12977/ocula34Search in Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 2012. Big Data and their epistemological challenge. Philosophy & Technology 25(4). 435–437.10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4Search in Google Scholar
Friederici, N., S. Ojanperä & M. Graham. 2017. The impact of connectivity in Africa: Grand visions and the mirage of inclusive digital development. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 79(2). 1–20.10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00578.xSearch in Google Scholar
Galloway, A. 2011. Are some things unrepresentable? Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8). 85–102.10.1177/0263276411423038Search in Google Scholar
Garcia, M. 2016. Racist in the machine: The disturbing implications of algorithmic bias. World Policy Journal 33(4). 111–117.10.1215/07402775-3813015Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford Hillsdale (eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, 67–82. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Gitelman, L. 2013. Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Graham, Mark. 2012. Big Data and the end of theory? The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/mar/09/big-data-theory (accessed 10 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Hales, David. 2013. Lies, damned lies, and Big Data. Rethinking International Cooperation in a Complex Worldhttps://aidontheedge.info/2013/02/01/lies-damned-lies-and-big-data/ (accessed 18 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Hartman, Bruce. 2015. Big Data is watching you!: A comic dystopia. Philadelphia: Swallow Tail Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hern, A. 2014. Google: 100,000 lives a year lost through fear of data-mining. The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/26/google-healthcare-data-mining-larry-page (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Iliadis, A. & F. Russo. 2016. Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society 3(2). 1–7.10.1177/2053951716674238Search in Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. 2014. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 1(1). 1–12.10.1177/2053951714528481Search in Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. & T. P. Lauriault. 2015. Small data in the era of Big Data. GeoJournal 80(4). 463–475.10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7Search in Google Scholar
Krampen, M., K. Oehler, R. Posner, T. A. Sebeok & T. von Uexküll (eds). 1987. Classics of semiotics. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4757-9700-8Search in Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. 2005. The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Lazzarato, M. 2008. The machine (epilogue). In G. Raunig (ed.), Tausend Maschinen Eine kleine Philosophie der Maschine als sozialer Bewegung, M. O’Neill (trans.). Vienna:Turia+Kant.Search in Google Scholar
Lazzarato, M. 2014. Signs and machines. Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. New York: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, P. 2018. “Fiction is outperforming reality”: How YouTube’s algorithm distorts truth. The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/02/how-youtubes-algorithm-distorts-truth (accessed 2 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Lorino, Philippe. 2002. Vers une théorie pragmatique et sémiotique des outils appliquée aux instruments de gestion. Documents de recherche, ESSEC. http://pfleurance.hautetfort.com/list/seminaire-7-l-intelligence-strategique-en-gestion/4140115640.pdf (accessed 27 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Mayer-Schonberger, V & K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A revolution that will change how we live, work, and think. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzocchi, Fulvio. 2015. Could Big Data be the end of theory in science? A few remarks on the epistemology of data-driven science. Science & Society 16(10). 1250–1255.10.15252/embr.201541001Search in Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. & K. Crawford. 2016. Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society 3(1). 1–14.10.1177/2053951716650211Search in Google Scholar
More, M. & N. Vita-More. 2013. The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. New York: John Wiley.10.1002/9781118555927Search in Google Scholar
Older, M. 2016. Infomocracy. New York: Tor.com.Search in Google Scholar
Online Etymology Dictionary. 2018. Data. https://www.etymonline.com/word/data (accessed 23 February 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin. Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.]Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1978. Écrits sur le signe, G. Deledalle (ed. & trans.). Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1992. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1, 1867–1893, N. Houser & C. Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1.].Search in Google Scholar
Pigliucci, Massimo. 2009. The end of theory in science? Science & Society, EMBO Reports 10(6). 534.10.1038/embor.2009.111Search in Google Scholar
Prensky, M. 2009. H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate 5(3). 1.10.1108/10748120110424816Search in Google Scholar
Puschmann, C. & J. Burgess. 2014. Big Data, big questions, metaphors of Big Data. International Journal of Communication 8. 20.Search in Google Scholar
Rancière, J. 2003. Le destin des images. Paris: La Fabrique.Search in Google Scholar
Resnik, D. 2000. Statistics, ethics, and research: An agenda for educations and reform. Accountability in Research 8. 163–188.10.1080/08989620008573971Search in Google Scholar
Rouvroy, A. 2015. Big Data: De nouveaux outils à combiner aux savoirs établis et à encadrer par la délibération publique. Interview with Antoinette Rouvroy. Statistique et Société 2(4). 33–41.Search in Google Scholar
Rouvroy, A. & T. Berns. 2013. Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation. Réseaux 1. 163–196.10.3917/res.177.0163Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. 1972 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar
Schradie, Jen. 2013. Big Data not big enough? How the digital divide leaves people out. MediaShifthttp://mediashift.org/2013/07/big-data-not-big-enough-how-digital-divide-leaves-people-out/ (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. 2001 [1994]. Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Shamoo, A. E. & B. R. Resnik. 2003. Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Silva, S. & M. Kennedy. 2017. Algorithms, platforms, and ethnic bias: An integrative essay. Special issue. Phylon 55(1-2). 9–37.Search in Google Scholar
Steadman, I. 2013. Big Data and the death of the theorist. Wiredhttp://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013–01/25/big-data-end-of-theory (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Sweeney, L. 2013. Discrimination in online ad delivery. https://dataprivacylab.org/projects/onlineads/1071–1.pdf (accessed 19 February 2018).10.2139/ssrn.2208240Search in Google Scholar
Symons, J. & R. Alvarado. 2016. Can we trust Big Data? Applying philosophy of science to software. Big Data & Society 3(2). 1–17.10.1177/2053951716664747Search in Google Scholar
Tyzlik-Carver, M. 2017. Posthuman curating and its biopolitical executions: The case of curating content. Executing Practices 6. 155–172.Search in Google Scholar
Wachter-Boettcher, S. 2017. Technically wrong: Sexist apps, biased algorithms, and other threats of toxic tech. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1978 [1929]. Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zlotowski, J., D. Proudfoot & C. Bartneck. 2013. More human than human: Does the uncanny curve really matter? University of Cambridge Research Repositoryhttps://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/8698 (accessed 1 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Zourabichvili, François. 1997. “Qu’est-ce qu’un devenir, pour Gilles Deleuze?”: Acte de conférence. Lyon: Horlieu Éditions.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
