Skip to main content

Walker Percy, Phenomenology, and the Mystery of Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Walker Percy, Philosopher

Abstract

In his theoretical essays on language, Walker Percy criticizes contemporary linguistics for overlooking the deep, existential impact that language acquisition has on human life. This acquisition, for Percy, radically transforms the human being’s mode of existence. With the acquisition of language, the world and our role in it change. The meaning of the world comes to be revealed through the ongoing life of human discourse: through books, conversations, philosophical inquiry, and so on. This chapter clarifies and elaborates on Percy’s critique by showing how it arises as a central insight in twentieth-century German phenomenology, particularly in the later work of Martin Heidegger and in the hermeneutic phenomenology of Heidegger’s student, Hans-Georg Gadamer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aristotle (1098b) here argues that it is not the capacity for survival or perception that is distinctively human but the capacity for action in accordance with logos (language, speech, reasoning).

  2. 2.

    Lushchei 1972; Lawson 1979, pp. 219–244; Lawry 1980, pp. 547–557; Crowley, 1989, pp. 225–242; Crowley and Crowley 1989, pp. 225–242; Lauder, 1996.

  3. 3.

    This is evident, for example, in “Symbol as Hermeneutic in Existentialism,” where Percy considers a number of Heideggerean concepts as characteristic of the broader school of “European existentialism” (MB, pp. 277–287). See also Dewey 1972, p. 278.

  4. 4.

    Brock (1949) contained the first translations of Heidegger’s work in English. It included four essays in translation (“Remembrance of the Poet,” “Hölderlin and the Essence of Poetry,” “On the Essence of Truth,” and “What Is Metaphysics”) and Brock’s own explanation of Heidegger’s philosophy, particularly, Being and Time). Percy owned Existence and Being and took extensive notes in his copy of it. Brock, a student of Karl Jaspers, reads Heidegger’s work through the lens of Kierkegaard . In his earlier book, Brock (1935) presents Heidegger as an inheritor of Kierkegaard’s existentialism, particularly Kierkegaard’s insistence that philosophy must begin with the study of the distinctive features of human existence.

  5. 5.

    Keller was insistent on using metaphors of vision and rejected the idea that they were inaccessible to the blind. In The World I Live In, Keller responds to the policy of the Matilda Ziegler Magazine for the Blind to omit stories and poems that make allusions to visually stunning scenes that would, according to the magazine, only “serve to emphasize the blind man’s sense of his affliction.” Keller responds: “That is to say, I may not talk about beautiful mansions and gardens because I am poor. I may not read about Paris and the West Indies because I cannot visit them in territorial reality. I may not dream of heaven because it is possible that I may never go there. Yet a venturesome spirit impels me to use words of sight and sound whose meaning I can guess only from analogy and fancy. This hazardous game is half the delight, the frolic, of daily life. I glow as I read of splendors which the eye alone can survey” (Keller 2005, p. 32).

  6. 6.

    The text of the lecture has been reconstructed on the basis of student transcripts. See Heidegger 2009.

  7. 7.

    Feldman (2006, p. 88) argues that in Being and Time Heidegger attempts to use language to reveal the limits of language and thus that the book is ultimately not a discussion of being but a performance of language’s inability to represent being. She observes that, in Heidegger’s book, “the very words of the investigation into being are wrested out of readiness-to-hand, in part by devices such as italics, scare quotes, hyphenation, invention, and etymology, which thematize or make conspicuous the word-character of the words.”

  8. 8.

    One thinks here of Helen Keller’s reflection on what prepares one to become a writer. “You see, there is but one road to authorship,” Keller writes. “It remains for ever a way in which each man must go a-pioneering. … What I mean is, we can follow where literary folk have gone; but, in order to be authors ourselves, to be followed, we must strike into a path where no one has preceded us” (Keller, 1913, p. 120).

  9. 9.

    For example, Heidegger writes (1971, p. 81): “There is some evidence that the essential nature of language flatly refuses to express itself in words – in the language, that is, in which we make statements about language”. Likewise, “The Way to Language” begins with a reverential invocation of a line from Novalis (Georg Philipp Friedrich von Hardenberg) that Heidegger hopes will encourage his listeners to keep the strangeness of language in mind throughout his lecture: “The peculiar property of language, namely that language is concerned exclusively with itself – precisely that is known to no one” (Heidegger 1971, p. 111).

  10. 10.

    In his interactions with his guests from Japan, the topic of language was naturally important, since several of the guests were involved with the translation of Heidegger’s works into Japanese. Heidegger’s attention to this particular language, then, reflects his interest in these translation projects. It is worth recalling too that Heidegger’s work was first translated into Japanese in 1930, 19 years before the first English translation.

References

  • Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger, Charles P. 1989. Logos and Epiphany: Walker Percy’s Theology of Language. In: Critical Essays on Walker Percy, ed. J. Donald Crowley and Sue Mitchell Crowley. Boston: G. K. Hall & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Wener. [1935] 2014. An Introduction to Contemporary German Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1949. Existence and Being. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, Sue Mitchell. 1989. Walker Percy’s Wager: The Second Coming. In Critical Essays on Walker Percy, ed. J. Donald Crowley and Sue Mitchell Crowley. Boston: G. K. Hall & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, Bradley R. 1972. Walker Percy Talks about Kierkegaard: An Annotated Interview. The Journal of Religion 54 (3): 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Karen S. 2006. Binding Words: Conscience and Rhetoric in Hobbes, Hegel, and Heidegger. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2013. Truth and Method. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. A Dialogue on Language. In On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. Trans. Wanda Torres Gregory and Yvonne Unna. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Helen. 1913. Out of the Dark. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The World I Live In. In Helen Keller: Selected Writings, ed. Kim E. Nielsen. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, Robert E. 1996. Walker Percy: Prophetic, Existentialist, Catholic Storyteller. New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, Edward G. 1980. Literature as Philosophy: The Moviegoer. The Monist 63 (4, 1): 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Lewis A. 1979. The Fall of the House of Lamar. In: The Art of Walker Percy: Stratagems for Being, ed. Panthea Reid Broughton. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lushchei, Martin. 1972. The Sovereign Wayfarer: Walker Percy’s Diagnosis of the Malaise. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy, Walker. 1975. Message in the Bottle: How Queer Man Is, How Queer Language Is, and What One Has to Do with the Other. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Signposts in a Strange Land. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Culbertson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Culbertson, C. (2018). Walker Percy, Phenomenology, and the Mystery of Language. In: Marsh, L. (eds) Walker Percy, Philosopher. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77968-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics