Skip to main content
Log in

Leading and Following (Un)ethically in Limen

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a liminality-based analysis of the process of ethical leadership/followership in organizations. A liminal view presents ethical leadership as a process taking place in organizational contexts that are often characterized by high levels of ambiguity, which render the usual rules and preferences dubious or inadequate. In these relational spaces, involving leaders, followers, and their context, old frames may be questioned and new ones introduced in an emergent way, through subtle processes whose evolution and implications may not be easy to grasp even by those participating in them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L.: 2002, Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104 (3), 783-790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackroyd, S. and P. Thompson: 1999. Organizational misbehavior (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., J. A. Mitchel. and D. Jondle: 2009, “Characteristics of ethical business cultures”, Journal of Business Ethics 85, 445-451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1985, The Nicomachean Ethics (trans. Terence Irwin) (Hackett, Indianapolis).

  • Ashforth, B.E., D. A. Gioia, S. L. Robinson and L. K. Treviño: 2008, ‘Re-viewing organizational corruption’, Academy of Management Review 33, 670-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballas, A.A. and H. Tsoukas: 2004. “Measuring nothing: The case of the Greek national health system.” Human Relations 57, 661-690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargiela-Chiappini, F.: 2007. “Liminal ethnography: Understanding segregated organisations”, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 2(2), 126-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A.: 2007 “Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal-setting: A review and theory-development”, Journal of Business Ethics 81(1), 63-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. and D. Chugh: 2006, ‘Decisions Without Blinders’, Harvard Business Review January, 88–97.

  • Beekun, R.I., Y. Stedham, J. H. Yamamura and J. A. Barghouti: 2004. “Comparing business ethics in Russia and the US”, International Journal of Human Resource Management 14, 1333-1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, K.: 2008, The Subprime Lending Crisis: Causes and Effects of the Mortgage Meltdown, CCH Catalogue (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, New York).

  • Bowie, N. E.: 1998 ‘A Kantian theory of meaningful work’, Journal of Business Ethics,17:1083-1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H. and B. M. Lichtenstein: 2000. “Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between”, Organization Science 11, 551-564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N.: 1985, ‘A Janus-headed model of Ethical Theory: Looking Two Ways at Business/Society’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 568–576.

  • Brenkert, G. G.: 2009. Google, human rights, and moral compromise. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E. and L. K. Treviño: 2006 “Ethical leadership: A review and future directions”, Leadership Quarterly 17, 595-616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E., L. K. Treviño, and D. Harrison: 2005, “Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97, 117-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, J. G.: 2008, ‘The Functionality of Gray Area Ethics in Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551.9994-7.

  • Byrne, J. A., M. France, and W. Zellner: 2002, ‘The Environment was Ripe for Abuse’, BusinessWeek February 25, 37–39.

  • Cabral-Cardoso, C.: 2004, “Ethical misconduct in the business school: A case of plagiarism that turned bitter”, Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 75-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camiah, N. and G. Hollinshead: 2003, “Assessing the potential for effective cross-cultural working between “new” Russian managers and western expatriates”, Journal of World Business 38, 245-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.J.: 2008, “Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 288-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. Y., J. W. Eichenseher, and T. Taniguchi: 2008, “Ethical perceptions of business students: Differences between East Asia and the USA and among ‘Confucian’ cultures”, Journal of Business Ethics 79(1-2), 121-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.: 2006, ‘Chief Ethics Officers: Who needs them?’, Forbes, October 23, http://www.forbes.com/2006/10/23/leadership-ethics-hp-lead-govern-cx_hc_1023ethics.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2009.

  • Clegg, S.R., M. Kornberger, and C. Rhodes: 2007, “Business Ethics as Practice”, British Journal of Management 18(2), 107-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R., C. Carter, M. Kornberger, M. Messner, and S. Laske, eds.,: 2007, Business ethics as practice: Representation, discourse and performance (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A.: 2006. “Newly betwixt and between: Revising liminality in the context of a teacher preparation program”, Anthropology and Education Quarterly 37(2), 110-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. : 1963, Le phenomène bureaucratique (Seuil, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M. P. and C. Cabral-Cardoso: 2007, ‘Shades of Gray: A Liminal Interpretation of Organizational Legality/Illegality’, International Public Management Journal 9(3), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B.: 2008. A theory of organizing (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. and C. Mazza: 2003, “Consulting as a liminal space.” Human Relations 56, 267-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann, G. and N. Haddow: 2007. ‘Just doing business or doing just business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the business of censoring China’s Internet’, Journal of Business Ethics 79(3): 219-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Nieuwenboer, N. and M. Kaptein: 2008, “Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social identity processes that cause corruption in organizations to grow”, Journal of Business Ethics 83,133-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1996, ‘Values in Tension: Ethics Away from Home’, Harvard Business Review Sep–Oct, 48–62.

  • Donaldson, T. and T. W. Dunfee (1994) Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2), 252-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G.: 2007, “The ethics of conviction versus the ethics of responsibility: A false antithesis for business ethics”, Journal of Human Values 13(2), 83-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D., and D. Thomas (1992), Career management issues facing expatriates. Journal of International Business Studies 23(2), 271-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L.: 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance (Row Petersen, Evanston, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, G.: 2008, “The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business”, Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 359-372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France, M. and W. Zellner: 2002, ‘Enron’s Fish Story’, BusinessWeek February 25, 35–36

  • Fulmer, R.M. 2004. “The challenge of ethical leadership”, Organizational Dynamics 33(3), 307-317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garsten. C.: 1999. “Betwixt and between: Temporary employees as liminal subjects in flexible organizations”. Organization Studies 20 (4): 601-617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellerman, S. W.: 1986, ‘Why ‘Good’ Managers Make Bad Ethical Choices’, Harvard Business Review July–August, 85–90.

  • Glynn, M. and H. Jamerson: 2006. Principled leadership: A framework for action. In E. D. Hess and K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Leading values: Positivity, virtue, and high performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 151-171.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1974, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (Northeastern University Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R., S. R. Clegg, and M. Kornberger: 2009, “Embedded ethics: Discourse and power in the New South Wales Police service”, Organization Studies 30(1), 73-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. and S. Knouse (2001) Multinational Enterprise Decision Principles for Dealing with Cross Cultural Ethical Conflicts. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 77-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haritos-Fatouros, M.: 1988, ‘The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18, 1107-1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1975. “Moral relativism defended”. Philosophical Review, 84 (1): 3-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. 1999, “Universalizability and reciprocity in international business ethics”, Business Ethics Quarterly 9, 406-407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkson, K., A. Heising and D. M. Rousseau: 2001, `The Interim Manager: Prototype of the 21st-century Worker?', Human Relations 54, 259–284

  • Izraeli, D.: 1988, “Ethical beliefs and behavior among managers: A cross-cultural perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 263-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.: 2008, “Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty”, Organization Science 19, 729-752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 2008. “Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective”. Journal of Management 34, 978-1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B.: 2004, Bad leadership (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H.: 1939. “Ethics and economic reform, III. Christianity” Economica, New Series, 24(6), 398-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H., D. O’Doherty, T. Vurdubakis, and C. Westrup (2007) Rites of passage: Organization as an excess of flow. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23, 265-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofoed, J. 2008. Muted transitions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(2), 199-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M.: 1983. “The experience sampling method”, New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 41-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B.B., M. Uhl-Bien, R. Marion, A. Seers, J. D. Orton. and C. Schreiber: 2006. “Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems”, E:CO, 8(4), 2-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, Y. and R. Albin 2007. “Moral dilemmas in business ethics: From decision procedures to edifying perspectives”, Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 195-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., B. McKelvey, L. Mirabeau, and N. Oztas (2006), Complexity science and organization studies. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B., Lawrence and W.R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp.165-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P.K. 2008, “Goffman on organizations”, Organization Studies, 29(5), 677-699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuch, M. (1985) Vicious circles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 14-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J.R., S. B. Ehrlich, and J. M. Dukerich (1985) The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 78-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulki, J.P., J. F. Jaramillo, and W. B. Locander: 2009, “Critical role of leadership on ethical climate and salesperson behaviors”, Journal of Business Ethics 86, 125-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nel, D, L. Pitt and R. Watson: 1989, “Business ethics: defining the twilight zone”, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 781-791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., B. Bhatt, and T. Gutteridge: 1978. “Determinants of expatriate effectiveness: A theoretical and empirical vacuum”, Academy of Management Review 3(3), 655-661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez, L.D., M. E. Schweitzer, A. D. Galinsky, and M. Bazerman: 2009. “Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting”, Academy of Management Perspectives 23(1), 6-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J.: 1996, Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J., C. R. Leana, and F. Pil: 2008, “Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption”, Academy of Management Review 33(3), 685-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S. M. and D. J. McCarthy: 1995, “Finding the common ground in Russian and American business ethics”, California Management Review 37(2), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K.A., P. Cilliers, and M. Lissack: 2001, “Complexity science: A ‘gray’ science for the ‘stuff in between’”, Emergence 3(2), 6-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M.: 1988, `You Asked for it: Christmas at the Bosses' Expense', Journal of Management Studies 25, 463–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. and D. Robertson: 1995. “The influence of country and industry on ethical perceptions of senior executives in the U.S. and Europe”. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (4): 859-881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., M. L. Ambrose, and T. W. Noel: 1997. “The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice”. Academy of Management Journal 40(5): 1190-1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, H.B.: 1993, Ethnography in organizations (Newbury Park, CA Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. and J. Brinkmann: 2003, “Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes)”, Journal of Business Ethics 45(3), 243-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, E.: 2002. “Managerial moral strategies: In search of a few good principles”. Academy of Management Review 27 (1): 114-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, A.: 2009, ‘The Normalization of Corrupt Business Practices: Implications for Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT)’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0319-2.

  • Steidlmeier, P. 1999. Gift giving, bribery and corruption: Ethical management of business relationships in China. Journal of Business Ethics 20: 121-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengel, R.: 2008, ‘Mandela: His 8 Leadership Lessons’, Time July 9, 2008, www.time.com/time/workd/article0,8599,1821467,00.html. Retrieved 1 Dec 2008.

  • Sturdy, A., M. Schwarz, and A. Spicer: 2006, “Guess who’s coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy”, Human Relations 59, 929-960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tempest, S.: 2007, “Liminality”, In S.R. Clegg and J.R. Bailey (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Organizational Studies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp.821-824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempest, S. and K. Starkey 2004, The effects of liminality on individual and organizational learning. Organization Studies 25, 507-527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1950, Reason in Ethics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K.: 1986, “Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model”, Academy of Management Review 11, 601-617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K. and M. Brown,: 2004, “Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths”, Academy of Management Executive 18(2), 69-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K., M. Brown, and L. P. Hartman 2003, A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside the executive suite. Human Relations 56, 5-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R.: 1998, “American expatriates abroad: From neophytes to cosmopolitans”, Journal of World Business 33(2), 125-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V.: 1969, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M.: 2006, “Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing”, Leadership Quarterly 17, 654-676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep, A., 1908/1960. The Rites of PassageA Classical Study of Cultural Celebrations. (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1968 Philosophical investigations (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. C., W. F. Szeto, and S. K. Lee 2003, “Ethical perceptions in China: The reality of business ethics in an international context”, Management Decision 41(1/2), 180-189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G.: 2009 “Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. Leadership Quarterly 20: 49-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. 2004, A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In A. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil. Guilford, New York, pp. 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Miguel Cunha gratefully acknowledges support from Nova Forum. A preliminary version was presented at the EBEN Research Conference 2009, Beer-Sheva, Israel. We thank the participants in our session, and acknowledge the feedback obtained from the Journal during the review process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Pina e Cunha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

e Cunha, M.P., Guimarães-Costa, N., Rego, A. et al. Leading and Following (Un)ethically in Limen . J Bus Ethics 97, 189–206 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0504-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0504-3

Keywords

Navigation