Skip to main content
Log in

Marketing Strategy, Product Safety, and Ethical Factors in Consumer Choice

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms that wish to be morally responsible in providing products that meet a high standard of safety may face problems competing against firms that make unsafe products and sell these products at cheap prices; these problems may be compounded when consumers do not accurately process information about safety and risk. This paper presents a conceptual argument that the tort system may serve to promulgate information which makes it feasible for firms to market safe products even in the face of these competitive obstacles.

To corroborate the conceptual argument, the paper presents the results of an experimental study about the impact of negligence liability information on consumer product safety evaluation. The results show that provision of negligence information heightens consumer concern for safety and firms' ethical behavior, and increases the proportion of consumer choices in favors of the brands sold by manufacturers with a favorable track record for quality. More importantly, they indicate that provision of negligence information reduces the likelihood that brands which conform to inferior safety standards will be chosen by consumers who care about safety standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Thomas W. and William H. Cunningham: 1972, ‘The Socially Conscious Consumer’, Journal of Marketing 28 (April), 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, John R.: 1993, Ethics and The Conduct of Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, Wibecke: 1992, ‘Cognitive Components in Risk Perception: Natural Versus Manmade Risks’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5, 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen: 1996, ‘Perfecting Imperfect Duties: Collective Action to Create Moral Obligations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(1) 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, Paul and Joseph F. Fair: 1980, ‘Product Liability and Safety: Perspectives from Business Versus Public Policy Makers’, Journal of Business Research 8, 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, William R., Barry J. Babin, Mitch Griffin and Ronald Coulter: 1994, ‘Investigation of Product Liability Attitudes and Opinions: A Consumer Perspective’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 28(1), 54–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, William R., James B. DeConinck, Barry J. Babin and Mitch Griffin: 1991, ‘The Role of Consumer Sympathy in Product Liability Suits’, Journal of Business Research 22, 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Joel J.: 1994a, ‘Consumer Response to Corporate Environmental Advertising’, Journal of Consumer Marketing 11(2), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Joel J.: 1994b, ‘Good Ethics Is Good for Business: Ethical Attributions and Response to Environmental Advertising’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(11), 873–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, William D.: 1988, ‘The Effects of Probability and Consequence Levels on the Focus of Consumer Judgments in Risky Situations’, Journal of Consumer Research 15, 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, Minette E.: 1994, ‘Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Non-economic Buying Criterion’, Journal of Marketing 58(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, Pam Scholder, Joshua Lyle Wiener and Cathy Cobb-Walgren: 1991, ‘The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally-Conscious Behaviors’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 10 (Fall), 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, Valerie S.: 1988, ‘The Availability Heuristic and Perceived Risk’, Journal of Consumer Research 15, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Cathy and Ivan Ross: 1992, ‘Consumer Responses to Service Failures: Influence of Procedural and Interactional Fairness Perceptions’, Journal of Business Research 25, 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Mitch, Barry J. Babin and William R. Darden: 1992, ‘Consumer Assessment of Responsibility for Product-Related Injuries: The Impact of Regulations, Warnings, and Promotional Policies’, Advances in Consumer Research 19, 870–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Russell: 1988, Morality Within the Limits of Reason (Chicago University Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic and Amos Tversky (eds.), 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlovac, Marylie and John M. Darley: 1988, ‘Attributions of Responsibility for Accidents: A Negligence Law Analogy’, Social Cognition 6, 287–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Duncan: 1982, ‘Distributive and Paternalist Motives in Contract and Tort Law, With Special Reference to Compulsory Terms and Unequal Bargaining Power’, Maryland Law Review 41(4).

  • Kinnear, Thomas C., James R. Taylor and Sadrudin A. Ahmed, 1974, ‘Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who Are They?’, Journal of Marketing 38 (April), 20–24.

  • Lola, Lopes L.: 1987, ‘Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20, 255–295.

  • Lopes, Lola L.: 1983, ‘Some Thoughts on the Psychological Concept of Risk’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Allen and Robert A. Himschoot: 1994, ‘Ethics Perceptions of American Farmers: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(10), 795–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivoli, Pietra: 1995, ‘Ethical Aspects of Investor Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(4), 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, John A.: 1996, ‘Will the Real Socially Responsible Consumer Please Step Forward?’, Business Horizons 39(1), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Barry N., Sandler Dennis M. and David Shani: 1991, ‘Social Issues and Socially Responsible Investment Behavior: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 25(2), 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Edward J., Eric J. Johnson and Debra L. Stephens: 1989, ‘The Validity of Verbal Protocols’, Memory and Cognition 17, 759–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Alan: 1988, ‘Proposals for Products Liability Reform: A Theoretical Synthesis’, Yale Law Journal 97.

  • Schwepker, Charles H. and Bettina T. Cornwell: 1991, ‘An Examination of Ecologically Concerned Consumers and Their Intention to Purchase Ecologically Packaged Goods’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 10 (Fall), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, Prakash S.: 1994, ‘Imperfect Markets: Business Ethics as an Easy Virtue’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(10), 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul, Donald MacGregor and Nancy N. Kraus: 1987, ‘Perception of Risk from Automobile Safety Defects’, Accidents Analysis and Perception 19, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternthal, Brian, Alice M. Tybout and Bobby J. Calder: 1987, ‘Confirmatory Versus Comparative Approaches to Judging Theory Tests’, Journal of Consumer Research 14, 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, Manuel G.: 1982, Business Ethics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansinck, Brian: 1989, ‘The Impact of Source Reputation on Inferences About Unadvertised Attributes’, Advances in Consumer Research 16, 399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E., Jr.: 1975, ‘Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer’, Journal of Consumer Research 2, 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curlo, E. Marketing Strategy, Product Safety, and Ethical Factors in Consumer Choice. Journal of Business Ethics 21, 37–48 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005973306941

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005973306941

Keywords

Navigation