Skip to main content

Rorty as Virtue Liberal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Richard Rorty
  • 592 Accesses

Abstract

Virtue liberalism requires democratic citizens to possess certain ethical character traits, like open-mindedness, toleration, and autonomy. This puts it at odds with theories, like Rawlsian political liberalism, that seek to minimize liberalism’s ethical demands to accommodate a greater range of ethical pluralism. Although Rorty endorses Rawls’s theory, his pragmatic liberalism is best understood as a version of virtue liberalism that, in particular, recommends a controversial civic virtue of irony for good citizenship. Indeed, in contrast to Rawls, Rorty joins Dewey in conceiving of liberal democracy as a “way of life” that deeply affects our characters and our private commitments and projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Daniel Savage (2002) convincingly makes the case that Dewey is best understood as a “virtue liberal.”

  2. 2.

    Rorty’s most direct discussion of liberal education can be found in Rorty 1999, pp. 114–126.

  3. 3.

    I leave aside here the important questions of when civil disobedience or political revolution might be justified. Suffice to say that I do think both can be justified when levels of injustice reach certain thresholds.

  4. 4.

    Admittedly, Rorty at times seems to suggest that metaphysical/religious beliefs, as long as they are relegated to the private realm, are an acceptable or even desired feature of liberal society (see Rorty 1991, p. 175 et passim). His considered position, however, is that “in its ideal form, the culture of liberalism would be one which was enlightened, secular, through and through. It would be one where no trace of divinity remained” (Rorty 1989, p. 45; see also Rorty 2010, p. 547, where he suggests that we would be “better off” if religion were to “wither away”). For more discussion, see Curtis 2015, pp. 214–234.

References

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard J. 2003. Rorty’s inspirational liberalism. In Richard Rorty, eds. Charles Guignon and David R. Hiley, 124–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, Eamonn. 1997. Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Daniel. 2001. Irony, state, and utopia: Rorty’s ‘we’ and the problem of transitional praxis. In Richard Rorty: Critical dialogues, eds. Matthew Festenstein and Simon Thompson, 55–88. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, William M. 2015. Defending Rorty: Pragmatism and liberal virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1991. In The later works of John Dewey, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Emily R. 2001. Becoming free: Autonomy and diversity in the Liberal polity. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 2000. The two faces of liberalism. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy. 1999. Democratic education, rev. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas, Chandran. 2003. The Liberal archipelago. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal virtue: Citizenship, virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malachowski, Alan. 2002. Richard Rorty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, David. 2010. Modus vivendi liberalism: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Sara C. 2014. “Halal & Kosher Slaughter Banned in Denmark As Minister Insists ‘Animal Rights Come Before Religion,” The Huffington Post (24 February). At http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/18/halal-kosher-slaughter-banned-denmark-animal-rights-before-religion_n_4807192.html. Accessed 7 March 2016.

  • Owen, David. 2001. The avoidance of cruelty: Joshing Rorty on liberalism. In Richard Rorty: Critical dialogues, eds. Matthew Festenstein and Simon Thompson, 93–110. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangle, Thomas L. 1992. The ennobling of democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Philip L. 1995. Political liberalisms and their exclusions of the religious. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 69(2): 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1985. Justice as fairness: Political, Not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(Summer): 223–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1996. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondel, David. 2016. On the unappreciated radicalism of Rorty’s cultural politics. In Paper presented at the American Philosophical Association 2016 Pacific Division Meeting, 30-April 2. San Francisco, CA, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1991. Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1996. Idealizations, foundations, and social practices. In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, ed. Seyla Benhabib, 333–335. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1998a. In defense of minimalist liberalism. In Debating democracy’s discontent: Essays on American politics, law, and public philosophy, eds. Anita L. Allen and Milton C. Regan, 117–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1998b. Truth and progress: Philosophical papers, vol. 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2000. Universality and truth. In Rorty and his critics, ed. Robert B. Brandom, 1–30. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2001. Response to David Owen. In Richard Rorty: Critical dialogues, eds. Matthew Festenstein and Simon Thompson, 111–114. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2010. Reply to Jeffrey Stout. In The philosophy of Richard Rorty, eds. Randall E. Auxier and Lewis Edwin Hahn, 546–548. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Daniel. 2002. John Dewey’s liberalism: Individual, community, and self-development. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scorza, Jason A. 2008. Strong liberalism: Habits of mind for democratic citizenship. Lebanon: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spragens, Thomas A. 1999. Civic liberalism: Reflections on our democratic ideals. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voparil, Christopher. 2005. On the idea of philosophy as Bildungsroman: Rorty and his critics. Contemporary Pragmatism 2(1): 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, David Foster. 2005. Consider the lobster: And other essays. New York: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1997. Why we should reject what liberalism tells us about speaking and acting in public for religious reasons. In Religion and contemporary liberalism, ed. Paul J. Weithman, 162–181. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

Recommended Literature for Further Reading

  • Bacon, Michael. 2007. Richard Rorty: Pragmatism and political liberalism. Lexington Books: Latham, MD. This volume, which discusses the relationship between Rorty’s pragmatism and his commitment to liberalism, manages to be both the best introduction to Rorty’s thought while also containing arguments and insights valuable for professional scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guignon, Charles and Hiley, David R. 2003. Richard Rorty. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Of the many edited volumes on Rorty’s work, this is one of the best, and includes articles by leading Rorty commentators like: Richard J. Bernstein, Michael Williams, and Charles Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal virtues: Citizenship, virtue, and community in liberal constitutionalism. Clarendon Press. Macedo’s Liberal Virtues is a brilliant response to the communitarian critiques of liberalism made by political theorists at the end of the 20th Century. This response was – wrongly in my view – overshadowed by the development of political liberalism, most prominently by John Rawls. “Virtue liberalism” became something of a “path not taken” in liberal theory that I think theorists should reconsider.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William M. Curtis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Curtis, W.M. (2023). Rorty as Virtue Liberal. In: Müller, M. (eds) Handbuch Richard Rorty. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16253-5_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16253-5_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16252-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16253-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics