My five critics all raise important points, giving reasons for viewing my account as either insufficiently or overly realist or utopian. By and large, I stick to my guns in regarding my version of a realistic Utopia of a republican association of states as the most plausible way of achieving a non-dominating global order capable of meeting the moral and functional challenges to state sovereignty posed by cosmopolitanism and globalisation respectively.
CITATION STYLE
Bellamy, R. (2022). A reply to my critics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(4), 624–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2042959
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.