Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thirteen Reasons Why Revisited: A Monograph for Teens, Parents, and Mental Health Professionals

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jay Asher’s novel Thirteen Reasons Why and its Netflix adaptation have enjoyed widespread popularity. While they draw needed attention to issues like bullying and teen estrangement, they may have an unintended effect: they mislead about the etiology of suicide and even glamorize it to a degree. The medical literature has shown that suicide is almost always the result of psychiatric disorder, not provocative stress, in much the same way an asthmatic crisis is primarily the result of an underlying medical condition, not an allergic stimulus. Both the novel and Netflix series ignore this premise and even belittle the idea. Thus, while the story has artistic merits, it also has the potential to be destructive if accessed by young readers and viewers seeking guidance. Approximately ten percent of teens suffer from depression, and suicide recently surpassed homicide as the second-leading cause of death among persons ages ten to twenty-four in the United States. A more balanced view addressing these misconceptions is provided for teens, parents, and mental health professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 13 Reasons Why: Beyond the Reasons. 2017. Los Gatos, CA: Netflix.

  • Asher, J. 2007. Thirteen Reasons Why. United States: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 2017. “10 Years Affect Everything.” In Thirteen Reasons Why, edited by Razorbill Books, page vii. United States: Penguin Random House.

  • Cavanagh, J.T., A.J. Carson, M. Sharpe, and S.M. Lawrie. 2003. “Psychological Autopsy Studies of Suicide: A Systematic Review.” Psychological Medicine 33:395-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, S.C., M. Warner, and H. Hedegaard. 2016. “Increase in Suicide in the United States, 1999-2014.” CDC National Center for Health Statistics, brief no. 241. Accessed 22 January 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm.

  • Incaprera, J. 2017. Thirteen Reasons Why. Los Gatos, CA: Netflix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isometsä, E.T. 2001. “Psychological Autopsy Studies: A Review.” European Psychiatry 16:379-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, K.R. 1999. Night Falls Fast / Understanding Suicide. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P.R. and P.R. Slavney. 1998. “The Concept of Behaviors – Suicide.” In The Perspectives of Psychiatry: Second Edition, edited by P.R. McHugh and P.R. Slavney, 238-250. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Mojtabai, R., M. Olfson, and B. Han. 2016. “National Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults.” Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1878.

  • Pridmore, S and Walter, G. 2013. “Psychological Autopsies.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 47: 978-879.

  • Robins, E.R., G.E. Murphy, R.H. Wilkinson, S. Gassner, and J. Kayes. 1959. “Some Clinical Considerations in the Prevention of Suicide Based on a Study of 134 Successful Suicides.” American Journal of Public Health 49:888-899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, N. 2017. “13 Reasons Why Writer: Why We didn’t Shy Away from Hannah’s Suicide.” Vanity Fair Online. Accessed 22 February 2018. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/04/13-reasons-why-suicide-controversy-nic-sheff-writer.

  • Slavney, P.R. and P.R. McHugh. 1987. “Attempting to Deal with Ambiguity – Explanation & Understanding.” In Psychiatric Polarities, edited by P.R. Slavey and P.R. McHugh, 27-44. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E.M., J.L. Annest, T.R. Simon, F. Luo, and L.L. Dahlberg. 2015. “Suicide Trends among Persons aged 10-24 years—United States, 1994-2012.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64:201-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P.S., P. Berglund, and M. Olfson. 2005. “Failure and Delay in Initial Treatment Contact after First Onset of Mental Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.” Archives of General Psychiatry 62:603-613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas D’Agati.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Agati, D., Beaudry, M.B. & Swartz, K. Thirteen Reasons Why Revisited: A Monograph for Teens, Parents, and Mental Health Professionals. J Med Humanit 42, 345–353 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-019-09548-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-019-09548-y

Keywords

Navigation