Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gerechtigkeit, Gesundheit und Gesundheitsversorgung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medizinethik

Part of the book series: Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik ((GAE))

  • 6243 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Norman Daniels ist emeritierter Professor für Ethik und Public Health an der Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, USA, und zählt zu den wichtigsten US-amerikanischen Medizinethikern. Seine Forschungs- und Arbeitsschwerpunkte liegen in der politischen Philosophie und Medizinethik auf Fragen der gerechten Verteilung begrenzter Ressourcen, der Gesundheitspolitik und auf Fragen nach Kriterien vertretbarer Priorisierung und Grenzziehungen im Gesundheitswesen. Daniels’ Arbeit in diesem Bereich ist vor allem davon geprägt, den epochalen gerechtigkeitstheoretischen Entwurf seines Lehrers John Rawls (Rawls 1971) auf den Bereich der Gesundheitsversorgung und das Problem der Mittelknappheit in der Medizin anzuwenden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Acheson, D. et al. (1998): Report of the independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999): What is the point of equality ? Ethics 109, S. 287 – 337 (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Warum eigentlich Gleichheit ? in A. Krebs (Hrsg.): Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, R. J. (1988): Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 54, S. 79 – 95 (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Gleichheit und gleiche Chancen zur Erlangung von Wohlergehen in A. Honneth (Hrsg.): Pathologien des Sozialen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. et al. (1988): Inequalities in health: The black report; The health divide. London: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D. (1989): Justice, healthcare, and the elderly. Philosophy & Public Affairs 18(3), S. 297 – 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1995): Justice and the ADA: Does prioritizing and rationing healthcare discriminate against the disabled ? Social Philosophy and Policy 12, S. 159 – 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998): Ethical issues in the development of summary measures of health status. In: M. J. Field/M. R. Gold (Hrsg.): Summarizing population health: Directions for the development and application of population metrics. Washington: National Academy Press, S. 73 – 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. et al. (2000): From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (1987): Setting limits: Medical goals in an aging society. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1989): On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99, S. 906 – 944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1989): Democratic equality. Ethics 99, S. 727 – 751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A./Ham, C. (2000): The global challenge of healthcare rationing. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (1981): Health-care needs and distributive justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, S. 146 – 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1985): Just health care. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988): Am I my parents’ keeper ? An essay on justice between the old and the young. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990): Equality of what: Welfare, resources, or capabilities ? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (Supplement), S. 273 – 296.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1993): Rationing Fairly: Programmatic considerations. Bioethics 7(2/3), S. 224 – 233 (wieder abgedruckt in Daniels 1996b, S. 317 – 326).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1995): Seeking fair treatment: From the AIDS epidemic to national healthcare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996a): Mental disabilities, equal opportunity, and the ADA. In: R. J. Bonnie/J. Monahan (Hrsg.): Mental disorder, work disability, and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, S. 282 – 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996b): Justice and justification: Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998a): Rationing medical care: A philosopher’s perspective on outcomes and process. Economics and Philosophy 14, S. 27 – 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998b): Kamm’s moral methods. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58(4), S. 947 – 954.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998c): Distributive justice and the use of summary measures of population health status. In: M. J. Field/M. R. Gold (Hrsg.): Summarizing population health: Directions for the development and application of population metrics. Washington: National Academy Press, S. 58 – 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999): Enabling democratic deliberation: How managed care organizations ought to make decisions about coverage for new technologies. In: S. Macedo (Hrsg.): Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, S. 198 – 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2000): Democratic equality: Rawls’s complex egalitarianism. In: S. Freeman (Hrsg.): Companion to Rawls. Oxford: Blackwell, S. 241 – 276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N./Sabin, J. E. (1997): Limits to healthcare: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26, S. 303 – 350.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998a): The ethics of accountability and the reform of managed care organizations. Health Affairs 17(5), S. 50 – 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998b): Last-chance therapies and managed care: Pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy. Hastings Center Report 28(2), S. 27 – 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N./Kennedy, B./Kawachi, I. (1999): Why justice is good for our health: Social determinants of health inequalities. Daedalus 128(4), S. 215 – 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N./Light, D./Caplan, R. (1996): Benchmarks of fairness for healthcare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. et al. (2000): Is inequality bad for our health ? Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A./Thompson, D. (1996): Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C./Pickard, S. (1998): Tragic choices in healthcare: The story of child B. London: Kings Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, F. M. (1993): Morality, mortality. Bd. 1: Death and whom to save from it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, G. A. et al. (1996): Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: Analysis of mortality and potential pathways. British Medical Journal 312, S. 999 – 1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I./Kennedy, B. P. (1997): Health and social cohesion: Why care about income inequality ? British Medical Journal 314, S. 1037 – 1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999): Income inequality and health: Pathways and mechanisms. Health Services Research 34, S. 215 – 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I./Kennedy, B. P./Wilkinson, R. (Hrsg.) (1999): Income inequality and health: A reader. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I. et al. (1997): Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health 87, S. 1491 – 1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. P./Kawachi, I./Prothrow-Stith, D. (1996): Income distribution and mortality: Test of the Robin Hood Index in the United States. British Medical Journal 312, S. 1004 – 1008 (veröffentlichtes Erratum British Medical Journal 312, S. 1194).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. P. et al. (1998a): Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and selfrated health: A U. S. multi-level analysis. British Medical Journal 317, S. 917 – 921.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998b): Income inequality, social capital, and fire-arm-related violent crime. Social Science and Medicine 47, S. 7 – 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. W. et al. (1998): Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. American Journal of Public Health 88, S. 1074 – 1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. G. (1999): Social causes of social inequalities in health. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Working Paper. Series 99.01, January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. G. et al. (1998): Contribution of psychosocial factors to socioeconomic differences in health. The Milbank Quarterly 76(3), S. 403 – 448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, E. (1995): The person-tradeoff approach to valuing healthcare programs. Medical Decision Making 15, S. 201 – 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999): Cost-value analysis in healthcare: Making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971): A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1993): Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Politischer Liberalismus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabin, J./Daniels, N. (1994): Determining ‚medical necessity‘ in mental health practice: A study of clinical reasoning and a proposal for insurance policy. Hastings Center Report 24(6), S. 5 – 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (1975): Preference and urgency. Journal of Philosophy 77(19), S. 655 – 669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1980): Equality of what ? Tanner Lectures on human values, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1992): Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999): Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Ökonomie für den Menschen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G. (1992): Income distribution and life expectancy. British Medical Journal 304, S. 165 – 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994): The epidemiological transition: From material scarcity to social disadvantage ? Daedalus 123, S. 61 – 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996): Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Kranke Gesellschaften).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (1997): Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the ‚fair innings‘ argument. Health Economics 6, S. 117 – 132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boston, USA

    Norman Daniels

Authors
  1. Norman Daniels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Nikola Biller-Andorno

  2. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Klinische Ethik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Settimio Monteverde

  3. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Klinische Ethik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Tanja Krones

  4. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Tobias Eichinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daniels, N. (2021). Gerechtigkeit, Gesundheit und Gesundheitsversorgung. In: Biller-Andorno, N., Monteverde, S., Krones, T., Eichinger, T. (eds) Medizinethik. Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27695-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27696-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation